Safer gambling is important, so we’ve flagged some key betting mistakes to avoid during Sunday's race at Sepang.
Our expert betting writers bring you their final predictions and latest odds before the Bahrain Grand Prix in Malaysia.
We have picked a three-leg Bet Builder for Sunday’s Grand Prix, including a podium and points-finish selection.
The Guardian reports that California governor Gavin Newsom signed laws on Wednesday "aimed at protecting California workers from the threats of artificial intelligence , including potential job losses and workplace surveillance."
The laws ban employers from using the technology to predict a worker's emotional state by using their biometric data, require employers to send written notices to workers if AI is responsible for mass layoffs and ban employers from relying on AI to decide to fire someone... The governor signed a law this month requiring operators of AI chatbots to perform risk assessments before rolling them out and an executive order requiring the state to consult with experts to further improve oversight over the industry.
The law includes "expanded tracking of AI's economic effects" leading to recommendations on how to best "adapt job-training and public-benefit programs," according to the governor's office. "California has also launched an AI Unemployment Tracker and solicited statewide public input on AI's economic impacts through Engaged California."
But two weeks ago Politico reported that the governor also signed executive orders to "explore proposals like requiring that AI companies develop a 'kill switch' for their most advanced models."
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, who called for a slowdown in AI development amid existential risk concerns, said... that while a kill switch "could be a good idea," it was no "panacea...." [California lawmakers] were generally supportive of Newsom's plan and showed signs of coalescing around the kill switch idea, which was stripped out of legislation proposed two years ago. Rep. Ted Lieu, who introduced bipartisan kill switch legislation in the House, boosted Newsom's call for Congress to mirror California's approach.
But not everyone supports this approach, including the Free Software Foundation's campaigns manager, Greg Farough:
FSF: Having control over the technology we use is a fundamental part of software freedom. Without it, you simply don't have the basic freedoms you deserve when doing any type of computing, large or small. Don't let "artificial intelligence" be an exception: all users everywhere deserve complete control over their own computing. While it's understandable to be pleased by this news from California, Newsom's executive order also invites questions about the "kill switch" itself that could matter a great deal for freedom. Assuming such a kill switch was developed, who would really control it?
We hope our readers understand the problems inherent in giving one single or a small number of kill switches to anyone. Newsom wisely wants an independent organization to verify their functionality, but even this still sets too dangerous of a precedent. We cannot allow such centralization of power over our computing to become commonplace, especially by the corporations that provide these models in the first place. We also cannot trust even the most well-intentioned "independent organization" to take care of its verification.
Giving users the freedom that they deserve over large languages models would be an enormous departure from how most are developed and used today. But, if any group is capable of coming up with such a plan, it's the experts mentioned in Newsom's order. Like he states at the beginning of his executive order, the vast majority of them are already right there in California. We urge the Government Operations Agency to consider the precedent they are setting, and ask them to write their recommendation to the governor in ways that puts the freedom and dignity of the individual user first and foremost.
The Guardian adds that Newsom also signed an executive order this week "to require state agencies to continue to refer to the technology as 'artificial intelligence' instead of the term 'super intelligence' as Donald Trump recently ordered US diplomats to use."
The laws ban employers from using the technology to predict a worker's emotional state by using their biometric data, require employers to send written notices to workers if AI is responsible for mass layoffs and ban employers from relying on AI to decide to fire someone... The governor signed a law this month requiring operators of AI chatbots to perform risk assessments before rolling them out and an executive order requiring the state to consult with experts to further improve oversight over the industry.
The law includes "expanded tracking of AI's economic effects" leading to recommendations on how to best "adapt job-training and public-benefit programs," according to the governor's office. "California has also launched an AI Unemployment Tracker and solicited statewide public input on AI's economic impacts through Engaged California."
But two weeks ago Politico reported that the governor also signed executive orders to "explore proposals like requiring that AI companies develop a 'kill switch' for their most advanced models."
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, who called for a slowdown in AI development amid existential risk concerns, said... that while a kill switch "could be a good idea," it was no "panacea...." [California lawmakers] were generally supportive of Newsom's plan and showed signs of coalescing around the kill switch idea, which was stripped out of legislation proposed two years ago. Rep. Ted Lieu, who introduced bipartisan kill switch legislation in the House, boosted Newsom's call for Congress to mirror California's approach.
But not everyone supports this approach, including the Free Software Foundation's campaigns manager, Greg Farough:
FSF: Having control over the technology we use is a fundamental part of software freedom. Without it, you simply don't have the basic freedoms you deserve when doing any type of computing, large or small. Don't let "artificial intelligence" be an exception: all users everywhere deserve complete control over their own computing. While it's understandable to be pleased by this news from California, Newsom's executive order also invites questions about the "kill switch" itself that could matter a great deal for freedom. Assuming such a kill switch was developed, who would really control it?
We hope our readers understand the problems inherent in giving one single or a small number of kill switches to anyone. Newsom wisely wants an independent organization to verify their functionality, but even this still sets too dangerous of a precedent. We cannot allow such centralization of power over our computing to become commonplace, especially by the corporations that provide these models in the first place. We also cannot trust even the most well-intentioned "independent organization" to take care of its verification.
Giving users the freedom that they deserve over large languages models would be an enormous departure from how most are developed and used today. But, if any group is capable of coming up with such a plan, it's the experts mentioned in Newsom's order. Like he states at the beginning of his executive order, the vast majority of them are already right there in California. We urge the Government Operations Agency to consider the precedent they are setting, and ask them to write their recommendation to the governor in ways that puts the freedom and dignity of the individual user first and foremost.
The Guardian adds that Newsom also signed an executive order this week "to require state agencies to continue to refer to the technology as 'artificial intelligence' instead of the term 'super intelligence' as Donald Trump recently ordered US diplomats to use."
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Rendering Doom in a database is obviously a bad idea," Lukas Vogel writes in a lengthy blog post explaining how exactly he managed to render Doom using an SQL database. OK, that's not entirely accurate. The SQLDoom project uses a small Python client to handle input and output, drive the game's timing, and display each frame to the screen. Behind that, a series of CedarDB tables tracks the game geometry and state, while about 1,300 lines of SQL queries spread across 89 common table expressions implement the game logic and generate 35 bitmap framebuffers per second.
In this, SQLDoom is a major improvement over Vogel's previous DoomQL project, which last year set out to build "a multiplayer Doom-like shooter entirely in SQL." Unfortunately, that effort ended up with raycasting-based, grayscale ASCII graphics that were more akin to the simplistic 90-degree-angled maps of Wolfenstein 3D. The newer SQLDoom, on the other hand, generates full-color 640x480 frames that look like they could have come from the original Doom executable. [...] If you want to run a Doomtabase on your own local machine, you can do so simply with the GitHub code, a copy of CedarDB, and a Doom WAD file. Or you can jump into a free online hosted demo match to test it out without all the setup [...].
In this, SQLDoom is a major improvement over Vogel's previous DoomQL project, which last year set out to build "a multiplayer Doom-like shooter entirely in SQL." Unfortunately, that effort ended up with raycasting-based, grayscale ASCII graphics that were more akin to the simplistic 90-degree-angled maps of Wolfenstein 3D. The newer SQLDoom, on the other hand, generates full-color 640x480 frames that look like they could have come from the original Doom executable. [...] If you want to run a Doomtabase on your own local machine, you can do so simply with the GitHub code, a copy of CedarDB, and a Doom WAD file. Or you can jump into a free online hosted demo match to test it out without all the setup [...].
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Flock's cameras offer "indiscriminate mass surveillance," a U.S. federal judge wrote in a ruling Thursday, as does any system with "continuously updated" location histories for all the vehicles filmed by automated license plate-reading cameras.
The judge's ruling included italics for emphasis when describing "the question of why is it the government's business where everyone goes all the time?"
Judge Hill: We might reasonably expect our friends and family to tell us something like: "Hey, I saw you out driving by the store last week." But we do not expect people we know — let alone strangers, and especially not law enforcement — to randomly approach us to say: "Hey, I have been following your car for the last 30 days, and here is a detailed log of every place your vehicle has been with supporting photographic evidence. I am also going to share this information with law enforcement throughout the country so they know your whereabouts, too...."
Cell phones also move in public places where people can see you in plain view. But it becomes constitutionally problematic when law enforcement can indiscriminately and passively catalog your whereabouts over an extended period of time and then use that information for any purpose whenever convenient... [I]t is also consequential that we are
not just dealing with stationary cameras. The cameras on [police officer] Alaniz's vehicle itself feed information into these systems... It is also no longer difficult to imagine law enforcement using a fleet of drones hovering over an entire city so they don't miss the movement
of a single vehicle.
Officer Alaniz had used Flock's travel history for a car when deciding to pull over its driver, which eventually led to a vehicle search and charges of possessing drugs with intent to distribute. But the judge wrote that because this violated reasonable expectation of privacy, "all evidence obtained after Alaniz initiated the ALPR search must be suppressed as fruit of the poisonous tree." The judge granted a motion to "suppress all evidence obtained as a result of these unconstitutional searches
and seizures."
The Washington Post got this comment from a Flock spokesperson about the judge's ruling: "we expect it will be appealed and ultimately overturned." (Flock's spokesperson added that the ruling "does not set controlling precedent and does not affect law enforcement agencies' continued use of these important public safety technologies.")
But meanwhile, on Friday U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders introduced the Ban Flock Act. The proposed bill bans federal agencies in America from using automated license plate reader systems "without explicit statutory authorization". The bill also lets certain federal agencies (including the Homeland Security Department) withhold grant money from State and local governments that use automatic license plate readers.
TechCrunch reports:
Despite its title, the bill doesn't call out Flock in the text and covers any and all ALPR systems. The bill allows exceptions only for toll collection and for uses that Congress approves in future legislation, which would have to limit data retention to no longer than 48 hours.... Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) are co-sponsors.
The judge's ruling included italics for emphasis when describing "the question of why is it the government's business where everyone goes all the time?"
Judge Hill: We might reasonably expect our friends and family to tell us something like: "Hey, I saw you out driving by the store last week." But we do not expect people we know — let alone strangers, and especially not law enforcement — to randomly approach us to say: "Hey, I have been following your car for the last 30 days, and here is a detailed log of every place your vehicle has been with supporting photographic evidence. I am also going to share this information with law enforcement throughout the country so they know your whereabouts, too...."
Cell phones also move in public places where people can see you in plain view. But it becomes constitutionally problematic when law enforcement can indiscriminately and passively catalog your whereabouts over an extended period of time and then use that information for any purpose whenever convenient... [I]t is also consequential that we are
not just dealing with stationary cameras. The cameras on [police officer] Alaniz's vehicle itself feed information into these systems... It is also no longer difficult to imagine law enforcement using a fleet of drones hovering over an entire city so they don't miss the movement
of a single vehicle.
Officer Alaniz had used Flock's travel history for a car when deciding to pull over its driver, which eventually led to a vehicle search and charges of possessing drugs with intent to distribute. But the judge wrote that because this violated reasonable expectation of privacy, "all evidence obtained after Alaniz initiated the ALPR search must be suppressed as fruit of the poisonous tree." The judge granted a motion to "suppress all evidence obtained as a result of these unconstitutional searches
and seizures."
The Washington Post got this comment from a Flock spokesperson about the judge's ruling: "we expect it will be appealed and ultimately overturned." (Flock's spokesperson added that the ruling "does not set controlling precedent and does not affect law enforcement agencies' continued use of these important public safety technologies.")
But meanwhile, on Friday U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders introduced the Ban Flock Act. The proposed bill bans federal agencies in America from using automated license plate reader systems "without explicit statutory authorization". The bill also lets certain federal agencies (including the Homeland Security Department) withhold grant money from State and local governments that use automatic license plate readers.
TechCrunch reports:
Despite its title, the bill doesn't call out Flock in the text and covers any and all ALPR systems. The bill allows exceptions only for toll collection and for uses that Congress approves in future legislation, which would have to limit data retention to no longer than 48 hours.... Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) are co-sponsors.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Grand Final updates, 6pm BST kick-off at Old Trafford
4 mins. A strong carry from Scott takes Wakefield near to the Wire 20m line, but a mix up late in the set leads to an offside off a poor kick. Williams clears the Warrington lines from the penalty.
The next attack from the Wire has Walmsley claiming a towering kick close to the Trinity line, but he can’t do much when he lands and the ball is turned over.
Continue reading...Nations League updates from the 7.45pm BST kick-offs
It had all the edge of a pop concert in the stands but England looked ready to steal candy from a baby. The 6,200 Croatian under-14s allowed inside Stadion HNK Rijeka were invited free of charge and this was a priceless footballing experience. England ripped Croatia to shreds to take a firm grip on second place in their Nations League group, boosting their hopes of reaching next year’s quarter-finals, and anyone supporting the home team could at least find consolation in watching Harry Kane and Jude Bellingham combine to devastating effect.
Two changes for Scotland made by Sébastien Pocognoli: Stephen Welsh and Ben Doak come into the defence – Jack Hendry is suspended after his red card against Switzerland. I make it six changes for the hosts: Omeragikj, Elezi, Mitrovski, Atanasov, Stojchevski, Musliu all come into the starting lineup after their two disappointing Nations League results thus far.
Continue reading...It had all the edge of a pop concert in the stands but England looked ready to steal candy from a baby. The 6,200 Croatian under-14s allowed inside Stadion HNK Rijeka were invited free of charge and this was a priceless footballing experience. England ripped Croatia to shreds to take a firm grip on second place in their Nations League group, boosting their hopes of reaching next year’s quarter-finals, and anyone supporting the home team could at least find consolation in watching Harry Kane and Jude Bellingham combine to devastating effect.
Perhaps the ticket should have come with an adult age rating. This was grisly viewing for the locals but Thomas Tuchel delighted in England’s most complete performance since surging to a 4-2 win over Croatia at the World Cup. Kane marked his 124th cap with his 88th and 89th international strikes and had plenty of help. Three assists and a goal decorated a scintillating display from Bellingham and Tuchel found satisfaction in the other members of his ruthless front four getting on the scoresheet.
Continue reading...Yard Act uit Leeds wordt meestal ingedeeld bij de post-punk. Maar wel met invloeden die je niet zo vaak in dat genre hoort, zoals disco en hiphop. Hun muziek is vaak dansbaar, op het springerige af, dus de link met disco is te begrijpen. En zanger James Smith praat meer dan hij zingt, dus dat heeft wel iets van rappen.
Redeemer is niet springerig, maar wat zwaarder dan eerdere nummers van de band. Wel leunt het sterk op een beat, maar die is meer log dan dansbaar. Niks mis mee, wat mij betreft. En James Smith zingt, met dat typische Yorkshire accent waarin “fun” en “nun” perfect rijmen op “done”.
Lees meer berichten op Sargasso
MADRID (ANP) - De leider van de grootste Spaanse oppositiepartij, Alberto Núñez Feijóo van de PP, heeft opgeroepen tot verkiezingen na een zware nederlaag van de socialistische premier Pedro Sánchez in het parlement.
De premier, die met zijn partij de PSOE een minderheidsregering leidt, wilde de woningnood plotseling met ingrijpende maatregelen bestrijden en vroeg de oppositie hem te steunen. Vrijdag werden zijn plannen weggestemd. Ook regionale partijen die zijn kabinet geregeld steunen, lieten het over het algemeen afweten.
Volgens Feijóo heeft Sánchez acht jaar wanbeleid geprobeerd te verdoezelen met een paar noodmaatregelen. "Sánchez moet niet nóg langer treuzelen", maar verkiezingen houden, zei Feijóo zaterdag. Diens Volkspartij (PP) en de nationalistische partij VOX staan er goed voor in peilingen.
In Spanje hebben tienduizenden tegen de woningnood geprotesteerd en geroepen om een algemene staking.
HAVELTE (ANP) - Marathonschaatser Jan Roelof Kruithof is op 89-jarige leeftijd overleden. Dat melden RTV Drenthe en de NOS op basis van de familie.
Kruithof won tussen 1974 en 1991 negen keer de Alternatieve Elfstedentocht. Ook andere natuurijsklassiekers zoals de Oldambtrit, de Hollands Venetiëtocht en de Veluwemeertocht schreef de schaatser met de bijnaam 'de diesel van Havelte' op zijn naam.
Zijn meest succesvolle seizoenen lagen tussen de Elfstedentochten van 1963 en 1985 in. Zijn beste prestatie in de Elfstedentocht was de twaalfde plaats in 1985. In de laatste editie van 1997 kwam hij als een van de eerste toerrijders binnen.
Een omgewaaide schutting, een tuinstoel in de vijver van de buren of een losgerukte dakgoot: veel mensen gaan ervan uit dat de verzekering dat wel regelt. Dat valt vaak tegen. Verzekeraars betalen pas bij windkracht 7, je betaalt meestal zelf een flink eigen risico en bij slecht onderhoud krijg je helemaal niets. Nu het nazomerweer omslaat, heb je nog een paar dagen om je huis en tuin klaar te maken.
Het weer slaat om vanaf woensdag
Eerst nog even genieten. Volgens Weeronline is dinsdag waarschijnlijk de laatste dag met stralend nazomerweer. In de loop van de avond bereiken buien het zuidwesten van het land en daarmee komt een einde aan de droge periode. Woensdag wordt het volgens de weerdienst wisselvalliger en koeler, met 18 of 19 graden.
Daarna gaat het pas echt herfsten. Vanaf donderdag 8 oktober wordt het wisselvallig met dagelijks buien of regengebieden en soms veel wind, verwacht Weeronline. Ook Hart van Nederland meldt dat de wind aantrekt, er meer bewolking komt en de kans op regen toeneemt. De rest van de week verloopt soms onstuimig, fris en wisselvallig. Hoe hard het precies gaat waaien, is nog onzeker.
Onder windkracht 7 krijg je niets
Hier zit de grootste misvatting. Alle opstalverzekeraars dekken stormschade bij een windkracht van 7 of hoger, schrijft de Consumentenbond. Daaronder is het voor de verzekeraar gewoon wind. Interpolis zegt het zonder omwegen: Schade door wind, dus bij windkracht 6 of minder, betalen we niet.
Of het hard genoeg heeft gewaaid, bepaal je niet zelf. Verzekeraars kijken naar de metingen van het KNMI. Bij windkracht 7 gaat het om een windsnelheid van 14 meter per seconde of meer gemeten door het KNMI. Volgens NN is dat nog redelijk gunstig, want het KNMI spreekt van storm bij windkracht 9.
Een schutting die bij windkracht 6 omvalt, is voor de verzekeraar geen stormschade.
Ook bij storm betaal je eerst zelf
Waait het wel hard genoeg, dan is er nog het eigen risico. Bij Interpolis, Centraal Beheer, Univé en Nationale-Nederlanden is dat € 250. ABN AMRO rekent een verplicht eigen risico van € 220. De Consumentenbond houdt het op vaak tussen de €200 en €250. Bij Allianz (Direct) en AnsvarIdea geldt het zelfgekozen eigen risico.
Heb je bewust gekozen voor geen eigen risico? Dat helpt je bij NN niet: daar betaal je bij extreem weer altijd eigen risico, ook als je geen eigen risico hebt gekozen bij het afsluiten van je verzekering. Bij Univé werkt het andersom: een vrijwillig eigen risico op je opstalverzekering hoef je niet te betalen bij stormschade. Kijk dus goed in je eigen polis.
Voor een paar losse planken in de schutting is € 250 al snel meer dan de reparatie zelf. Dan krijg je dus niets terug.
Achterstallig onderhoud kost je de hele vergoeding
Een verrotte paal is geen pech, maar slecht onderhoud. Centraal Beheer betaalt schade aan je schutting, maar de schutting moet wel gemaakt zijn van stevig materiaal en goed onderhouden zijn. Bij ABN AMRO staat achterstallig onderhoud, slijtage, verrotting of roest uitdrukkelijk bij wat niet verzekerd is.
Volgens ABN AMRO gaat het juist bij schuttingen vaak mis: palen in de grond verrotten of verroesten na verloop van tijd. Vervang de verrotte delen op tijd, anders is de schade mogelijk niet gedekt. Hetzelfde geldt voor je dak. Losse of scheve dakpannen kun je volgens de bank het best meteen repareren, anders is een eventuele schade mogelijk niet gedekt.
Schutting op de erfgrens? Dan is maar de helft gedekt
Veel schuttingen staan precies tussen jouw tuin en die van de buren. Volgens NN geldt dan: Staat je schutting op de erfafscheiding met je buren? Dan ben je voor maximaal 50% van de schade gedekt. Bij ABN AMRO betalen je verzekeraar en de verzekeraar van jouw buren allebei de helft. Zijn de buren onderverzekerd of hebben ze het onderhoud laten liggen, dan wordt het dus een gesprek over de schutting.
Andersom kan ook: de boom van de buren valt op jouw schuur. Die schade claim je volgens de Consumentenbond bij je eigen inboedelverzekering of opstalverzekering. Stormschade is vaak overmacht. Dat betekent dat jij of jouw buren niet aansprakelijk zijn voor schade aan anderen.
Je tuinset valt onder een andere polis
Je schutting, schuur en dak vallen onder de opstalverzekering. Losse spullen niet. Volgens Univé zijn losse spullen in je tuin dus wel verzekerd met je inboedelverzekering. Deze zijn bij stormschade alleen verzekerd met de inboedelverzekering met Buitenshuis dekking. Lemonade stelt nog een voorwaarde: tuinmeubelen of een barbecue kunnen gedekt zijn, mits ze buiten horen te staan én goed vastgezet zijn.
Bomen en planten zijn een apart geval. NN schrijft dat de opstalverzekering die meestal niet dekt, terwijl Interpolis schade aan bomen, struiken en planten vergoedt tot € 1.000.
Wat je nu kunt doen
Tot en met dinsdag is het droog en rustig. Dat is precies het weer om deze klusjes te doen:
- Duw stevig tegen je schutting en kijk naar de palen. Wiebelt er iets of zie je rot, vervang dan die delen. FBTO noemt palen van hardhout die 1 meter in de grond zitten de beste bevestiging.
- Maak je dakgoot leeg. Natte bladeren in afvoerpijpen of dakgoten zorgen voor meer gewicht, waardoor de kans op loslatende onderdelen tijdens een storm groter is, waarschuwt Allianz Direct.
- Berg losse spullen op. Het Verbond van Verzekeraars adviseert om tuinmeubilair en parasols binnen te zetten of goed vast te maken, en om te zorgen dat bloempotten, vuilcontainers, pergola's en barbecues niet kunnen omwaaien.
- Kijk vanaf de grond naar je dak. Liggen er pannen scheef of los, laat ze dan nu vastzetten.
- Haal dode en loshangende takken weg. Snoeien in de herfst moet wel met beleid: lees daarvoor ook ons eerdere stuk 'Deze planten moet je met rust laten in de herfst (en deze moet je wél snoeien)'.
- Zoek je polis erbij. Controleer je eigen risico bij stormschade en of je inboedelverzekering een buitenshuisdekking heeft.
Gaat er toch iets kapot, ga dan niet meteen zelf aan de slag. De meeste verzekeraars vergoeden niet of minder als je de stormschade zelf al hebt gerepareerd, schrijft de Consumentenbond. Interpolis raadt aan om duidelijke foto's van de schade en de situatie te maken en de rekeningen te bewaren. Meld de schade daarna bij je verzekeraar, maar pas nadat je via het KNMI hebt gecheckt of het echt windkracht 7 was.
Bronnen: Weeronline, Hart van Nederland, Consumentenbond, Interpolis, Centraal Beheer, Univé, NN (stormschade tuin), NN (stormschade schutting), ABN AMRO (stormschade), ABN AMRO (tips), a.s.r., Allianz Direct, FBTO, Lemonade
Weer voor Rotterdam ☁️ - 03-10-2026 19:15 CEST
In één oogopslag:
• 18.9°C · Bewolkt ☁️ | Min 13.3°C / Max 20.5°C
Verwachting voor vandaag:
• Min 13.3°C, Max 20.5°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1030.2 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/24h, Windsnelheid: 10.1 km/u (2.8 m/s), richting: → 256°
Uurlijkse voorspelling voor de komende 12 uur:
• 20:00: 18.4°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1030.1 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 7.9 km/u (2.2 m/s), richting: ↘ 332°
• 21:00: 17.9°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1030.1 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 6.5 km/u (1.8 m/s), richting: ↓ 343°
• 22:00: 17.5°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1030.2 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 6.8 km/u (1.9 m/s), richting: ↓ 348°
• 23:00: 17.0°C (Gedeeltelijk bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1030.3 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 4.0 km/u (1.1 m/s), richting: ↓ 8°
• 00:00: 16.7°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1030.2 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 5.0 km/u (1.4 m/s), richting: ↓ 356°
• 01:00: 15.9°C (Gedeeltelijk bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1030.3 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 7.2 km/u (2.0 m/s), richting: ↓ 358°
• 02:00: 15.5°C (Licht bewolkt) 🌕, 🧭 1030.1 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 5.8 km/u (1.6 m/s), richting: ↓ 11°
• 03:00: 15.3°C (Gedeeltelijk bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1029.8 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 5.0 km/u (1.4 m/s), richting: ↙ 25°
• 04:00: 15.1°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1029.5 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 5.4 km/u (1.5 m/s), richting: ↙ 64°
• 05:00: 14.7°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1029.4 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 5.8 km/u (1.6 m/s), richting: ↙ 23°
• 06:00: 14.4°C (Licht bewolkt) 🌕, Kans op neerslag 1%, 🧭 1029.4 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 5.8 km/u (1.6 m/s), richting: ← 71°
• 07:00: 14.8°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 2%, 🧭 1029.4 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 5.8 km/u (1.6 m/s), richting: ← 69°
Voorspelling voor de komende dagen:
• zondag 04 oktober: Min 14.4°C, Max 21.1°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 2%, 🧭 1029.2 hPa ↘️ -1.0 hPa/24h, Windsnelheid: 10.1 km/u (2.8 m/s), richting: ↙ 36°
• maandag 05 oktober: Min 15.1°C, Max 21.5°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1024.7 hPa ↘️ -4.5 hPa/24h, Windsnelheid: 14.0 km/u (3.9 m/s), richting: ↗ 230°
• dinsdag 06 oktober: Min 11.6°C, Max 18.7°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 4%, 🧭 1019.4 hPa ↘️ -5.3 hPa/24h, Windsnelheid: 8.2 km/u (2.3 m/s), richting: ↑ 171°
• woensdag 07 oktober: Min 11.6°C, Max 18.1°C (Matige motregen) 🌦️, Neerslag 2.1 mm, Kans op neerslag 38%, 🧭 1011.0 hPa ↘️ -8.4 hPa/24h, Windsnelheid: 14.8 km/u (4.1 m/s), richting: ↓ 357°
• donderdag 08 oktober: Min 9.4°C, Max 13.5°C (Lichte buien) 🌧️, Neerslag 13.7 mm, Kans op neerslag 65%, 🧭 1010.9 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/24h, Windsnelheid: 20.2 km/u (5.6 m/s), richting: ↘ 320°
• vrijdag 09 oktober: Min 9.1°C, Max 16.2°C (Zware motregen) 🌦️, Neerslag 4.3 mm, Kans op neerslag 28%, 🧭 1016.7 hPa ↗️ +5.8 hPa/24h, Windsnelheid: 14.5 km/u (4.0 m/s), richting: ↓ 351°
Details:
• 🌡️ Huidige temperatuur (om 19:15): 18.9°C (Bewolkt)
• 🤚 Gevoelstemperatuur: 18.3°C (-0.6°C)
• 💨 Windsnelheid: 9.7 km/u (2.7 m/s), richting: ↘ 318°
• 🌬️ Windstoten: 17.6 km/h (4.9 m/s)
• 💧 Luchtvochtigheid: 73%
• 🧭 Luchtdruk: 1030.1 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/3h
• 👁️ Zichtbaarheid: 18.0 km
• ☀️ UV-index: 0.0
• 🌅 Zonsopgang: 07:46 · 🌇 Zonsondergang: 19:15
Luchtkwaliteit:
• AQI: 63 🟡 (Matig)
• PM2.5: 9.9 μg/m³
• PM10: 17.7 μg/m³
Gegevens geleverd door Open-Meteo
#Rotterdam #Meteo #MeteoBot #MeteoNetherlands #OpenMeteo #FediMeteo
In één oogopslag:
• 18.9°C · Bewolkt ☁️ | Min 13.3°C / Max 20.5°C
Verwachting voor vandaag:
• Min 13.3°C, Max 20.5°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1030.2 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/24h, Windsnelheid: 10.1 km/u (2.8 m/s), richting: → 256°
Uurlijkse voorspelling voor de komende 12 uur:
• 20:00: 18.4°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1030.1 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 7.9 km/u (2.2 m/s), richting: ↘ 332°
• 21:00: 17.9°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1030.1 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 6.5 km/u (1.8 m/s), richting: ↓ 343°
• 22:00: 17.5°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1030.2 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 6.8 km/u (1.9 m/s), richting: ↓ 348°
• 23:00: 17.0°C (Gedeeltelijk bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1030.3 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 4.0 km/u (1.1 m/s), richting: ↓ 8°
• 00:00: 16.7°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1030.2 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 5.0 km/u (1.4 m/s), richting: ↓ 356°
• 01:00: 15.9°C (Gedeeltelijk bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1030.3 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 7.2 km/u (2.0 m/s), richting: ↓ 358°
• 02:00: 15.5°C (Licht bewolkt) 🌕, 🧭 1030.1 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 5.8 km/u (1.6 m/s), richting: ↓ 11°
• 03:00: 15.3°C (Gedeeltelijk bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1029.8 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 5.0 km/u (1.4 m/s), richting: ↙ 25°
• 04:00: 15.1°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1029.5 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 5.4 km/u (1.5 m/s), richting: ↙ 64°
• 05:00: 14.7°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1029.4 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 5.8 km/u (1.6 m/s), richting: ↙ 23°
• 06:00: 14.4°C (Licht bewolkt) 🌕, Kans op neerslag 1%, 🧭 1029.4 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 5.8 km/u (1.6 m/s), richting: ← 71°
• 07:00: 14.8°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 2%, 🧭 1029.4 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 5.8 km/u (1.6 m/s), richting: ← 69°
Voorspelling voor de komende dagen:
• zondag 04 oktober: Min 14.4°C, Max 21.1°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 2%, 🧭 1029.2 hPa ↘️ -1.0 hPa/24h, Windsnelheid: 10.1 km/u (2.8 m/s), richting: ↙ 36°
• maandag 05 oktober: Min 15.1°C, Max 21.5°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1024.7 hPa ↘️ -4.5 hPa/24h, Windsnelheid: 14.0 km/u (3.9 m/s), richting: ↗ 230°
• dinsdag 06 oktober: Min 11.6°C, Max 18.7°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 4%, 🧭 1019.4 hPa ↘️ -5.3 hPa/24h, Windsnelheid: 8.2 km/u (2.3 m/s), richting: ↑ 171°
• woensdag 07 oktober: Min 11.6°C, Max 18.1°C (Matige motregen) 🌦️, Neerslag 2.1 mm, Kans op neerslag 38%, 🧭 1011.0 hPa ↘️ -8.4 hPa/24h, Windsnelheid: 14.8 km/u (4.1 m/s), richting: ↓ 357°
• donderdag 08 oktober: Min 9.4°C, Max 13.5°C (Lichte buien) 🌧️, Neerslag 13.7 mm, Kans op neerslag 65%, 🧭 1010.9 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/24h, Windsnelheid: 20.2 km/u (5.6 m/s), richting: ↘ 320°
• vrijdag 09 oktober: Min 9.1°C, Max 16.2°C (Zware motregen) 🌦️, Neerslag 4.3 mm, Kans op neerslag 28%, 🧭 1016.7 hPa ↗️ +5.8 hPa/24h, Windsnelheid: 14.5 km/u (4.0 m/s), richting: ↓ 351°
Details:
• 🌡️ Huidige temperatuur (om 19:15): 18.9°C (Bewolkt)
• 🤚 Gevoelstemperatuur: 18.3°C (-0.6°C)
• 💨 Windsnelheid: 9.7 km/u (2.7 m/s), richting: ↘ 318°
• 🌬️ Windstoten: 17.6 km/h (4.9 m/s)
• 💧 Luchtvochtigheid: 73%
• 🧭 Luchtdruk: 1030.1 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/3h
• 👁️ Zichtbaarheid: 18.0 km
• ☀️ UV-index: 0.0
• 🌅 Zonsopgang: 07:46 · 🌇 Zonsondergang: 19:15
Luchtkwaliteit:
• AQI: 63 🟡 (Matig)
• PM2.5: 9.9 μg/m³
• PM10: 17.7 μg/m³
Gegevens geleverd door Open-Meteo
#Rotterdam #Meteo #MeteoBot #MeteoNetherlands #OpenMeteo #FediMeteo