Slashdot

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Viral Chinese App 'Are You Dead?' Checks On Those Who Live Alone

The viral Chinese app Are You Dead? (known as Sileme in Chinese) targets people who live alone by requiring regular check-ins and alerting an emergency contact if the user doesn't respond. It launched in May and is now the most downloaded paid app in China. Cybernews reports: Users need to check in with the app every two days by clicking a large button to confirm that they are alive. Otherwise, the app will inform the user's appointed emergency contact that they may be in trouble, Chinese state-run outlet Global Times reports. The app is marketed as a "safety companion" for those who live far from home or choose a solitary lifestyle.

Initially launched as a free app, "eAre You Dead?" now costs 8 yuan, equivalent to $1.15. Despite its growing popularity, the app has sparked criticism in China, where some said they were repulsed by the negative connotation of death. Some suggested the app should be renamed to "Are You Alive?" The app's creators told Chinese media that they will focus on improving the product, such as adding SMS notification features or a messaging function. Moreover, they will consider the criticism over the app's name.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

European Firms Hit Hiring Brakes Over AI and Slowing Growth

European hiring momentum is cooling as slower growth and accelerating AI adoption make both employers and workers more cautious. DW.com reports: [Angelika Reich, leadership adviser at the executive recruitment firm Spencer Stuart] noted how Europe's labor market has "cooled down" and how "fewer job vacancies and a tougher economic climate naturally make employees more cautious about switching jobs." Despite remaining resilient, the 21-member eurozone's labor market is projected to grow more slowly this year, at 0.6% compared with 0.7% in 2025, according to the European Central Bank (ECB).

Although that drop seems tiny, each 0.1 percentage point difference amounts to about 163,000 fewer new jobs being created. Just three years ago, the eurozone created some 2.76 million new jobs while growing at a robust rate of 1.7%. Migration has also played a major role in shaping Europe's labor supply, helping to ease acute worker shortages and support job growth in many countries. However, net migration is now stabilizing or falling.

In Germany, more than one in three companies plans to cut jobs this year, according to the Cologne-based IW economic think tank. The Bank of France expects French unemployment to climb to 7.8%, while in the UK, two-thirds of economists questioned by The Times newspaper think unemployment could rise to as high as 5.5% from the current 5.1%. Unemployment in Poland, the European Union's growing economic powerhouse, is edging higher, reaching 5.6% in November compared to 5% a year earlier. Romania and the Czech Republic are also seeing similar upticks in joblessness. The softening of the labor market has prompted new terms like the Great Hesitation, where companies think twice about hiring and workers are cautious about quitting stressful jobs, and Career Cushioning, quietly preparing a backup plan in case of layoffs.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Even Linus Torvalds Is Vibe Coding Now

Linus Torvalds has started experimenting with vibe coding, using Google's Antigravity AI to generate parts of a small hobby project called AudioNoise. "In doing so, he has become the highest-profile programmer yet to adopt this rapidly spreading, and often mocked, AI-driven programming," writes ZDNet's Steven Vaughan-Nichols. Fro the report: [I]t's a trivial program called AudioNoise -- a recent side project focused on digital audio effects and signal processing. He started it after building physical guitar pedals, GuitarPedal, to learn about audio circuits. He now gives them as gifts to kernel developers and, recently, to Bill Gates.

While Torvalds hand-coded the C components, he turned to Antigravity for a Python-based audio sample visualizer. He openly acknowledges that he leans on online snippets when working in languages he knows less well. Who doesn't? [...] In the project's README file, Torvalds wrote that "the Python visualizer tool has been basically written by vibe-coding," describing how he "cut out the middle-man -- me -- and just used Google Antigravity to do the audio sample visualiser." The remark underlines that the AI-generated code met his expectations well enough that he did not feel the need to manually re-implement it. Further reading: Linus Torvalds Says Vibe Coding is Fine For Getting Started, 'Horrible Idea' For Maintenance

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Should AI Agents Be Classified As People?

New submitter sziring writes: Harvard Business Review's IdeaCast podcast interviewed McKinsey CEO Bob Sternfels, where he classified AI agents as people. "I often get asked, 'How big is McKinsey? How many people do you employ?' I now update this almost every month, but my latest answer to you would be 60,000, but it's 40,000 humans and 20,000 agents."

This statement looks to be the opening shots of how we as a society need to classify AI agents and whether they will replace human jobs. Did those agents take roles that previously would have been filled by a full-time human? By classifying them as people, did the company break protocols or laws by not interviewing candidates for those jobs, not providing benefits or breaks, and so on?

Yes, it all sounds silly but words matter. What happens when a job report comes out claiming we just added 20,000 jobs in Q1? That line of thinking leads directly to Bill Gates' point that agents taking on human roles might need to be taxed.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Fintech Firm Betterment Confirms Data Breach After Hackers Send Fake $10,000 Crypto Scam Messages

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge: Betterment, a financial app, sent a sketchy-looking notification on Friday asking users to send $10,000 to Bitcoin and Ethereum crypto wallets and promising to "triple your crypto," according to a thread on Reddit. The Betterment account says in an X thread that this was an "unauthorized message" that was sent via a "third-party system." TechCrunch has since confirmed that an undisclosed number of Betterment's customers have had their personal information accessed. "The company said customer names, email and postal addresses, phone numbers, and dates of birth were compromised in the attack," reports TechCrunch.

Betterment said it detected the attack on the same day and "immediately revoked the unauthorized access and launched a comprehensive investigation, which is ongoing." The fintech firm also said it has reached out to the customers targeted by the hackers and "advised them to disregard the message."

"Our ongoing investigation has continued to demonstrate that no customer accounts were accessed and that no passwords or other log-in credentials were compromised," Betterment wrote in the email.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Meta Plans To Cut Around 10% of Employees In Reality Labs Division

Meta plans to cut roughly 10% of staff in its Reality Labs division, with layoffs hitting metaverse-focused teams hardest. Reuters reports: The cuts to Reality Labs, which has roughly 15,000 employees, could be announced as soon as Tuesday and are set to disproportionately affect those in the metaverse unit who work on virtual reality headsets and virtual social networks, the report said. [...] Meta Chief Technology Officer Andrew Bosworth, who oversees Reality Labs, has called a meeting on Wednesday and has urged staff to attend in person, the NYT reported, citing a memo. [...]

The metaverse had been a massive project spearheaded by CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who prioritized and spent heavily on the venture, only for the business to burn more than $60 billion since 2020. [...] The report comes as the Facebook-parent scrambles to stay relevant in Silicon Valley's artificial intelligence race after its Llama 4 model met with a poor reception.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

How Markdown Took Over the World

22 years ago, developer and columnist John Gruber released Markdown, a simple plain-text formatting system designed to spare writers the headache of memorizing arcane HTML tags. As technologist Anil Dash writes in a long piece, Markdown has since embedded itself into nearly every corner of modern computing.

Aaron Swartz, then seventeen years old, served as the beta tester before its quiet March 2004 debut. Google eventually added Markdown support to Docs after more than a decade of user requests; Microsoft put it in Notepad; Slack, WhatsApp, Discord, and Apple Notes all support it now. Dash writes: The part about not doing this stuff solely for money matters, because even the most advanced LLM systems today, what the big AI companies call their "frontier" models, require complex orchestration that's carefully scripted by people who've tuned their prompts for these systems through countless rounds of trial and error. They've iterated and tested and watched for the results as these systems hallucinated or failed or ran amok, chewing up countless resources along the way. And sometimes, they generated genuinely astonishing outputs, things that are truly amazing to consider that modern technology can achieve. The rate of progress and evolution, even factoring in the mind-boggling amounts of investment that are going into these systems, is rivaled only by the initial development of the personal computer or the Internet, or the early space race.

And all of it -- all of it -- is controlled through Markdown files. When you see the brilliant work shown off from somebody who's bragging about what they made ChatGPT generate for them, or someone is understandably proud about the code that they got Claude to create, all of the most advanced work has been prompted in Markdown. Though where the logic of Markdown was originally a very simple version of "use human language to tell the machine what to do", the implications have gotten far more dire when they use a format designed to help expresss "make this **bold**" to tell the computer itself "make this imaginary girlfriend more compliant".

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Fokke & Sukke

F & S

Behance Featured Projects

The latest projects featured on the Behance

Reveries


Realms of dreams and visions explored through the ethereal lens of Greek mythology.

Ginza, December 2025

mikeleonardvisualarts posted a photo:

Ginza, December 2025

StairStruck

Greg Adams Photography posted a photo:

StairStruck

Lisbon Sunset

Found Kodachrome Slide -- The Sirkka Sopanen Collection

Thomas Hawk posted a photo:

Found Kodachrome Slide -- The Sirkka Sopanen Collection

date stamped on slide, January 1971

Found Kodachrome Slide

Thomas Hawk posted a photo:

Found Kodachrome Slide

handwritten on slide, “1950"

Ginza, December 2025

mikeleonardvisualarts has added a photo to the pool:

Ginza, December 2025

Silhouette

Stueyman has added a photo to the pool:

Silhouette

Sunset at Shoalwater WA

Follow the Sun

Stueyman has added a photo to the pool:

Follow the Sun

Sunset over the Shoalwater Islands, WA

The dock of the bay?

John from Brisbane has added a photo to the pool:

The dock of the bay?

Not quite a dock but Manly Jetty in Brisbane's southern bayside. The further you get away from the Brisbane River, the less silty the sand. If you enlarge or zoom in you will see two close islands in the distance.

The one on the left is St Helena which for many years (1867-1932 approx) was a penal settlement (unlike much of Australia, not for transported convicts). See link below. It's accessible if you have a boat but the far better way is to take a guided tour including the boat trip which will give you a good backgrounder of its use and misuse. The other island, to the right is Green Island which is only accessible if you own a boat or are a darn good and brave swimmer in which case you will find yourself on a deserted island with just mangroves, crabs and birds.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Helena_Island_National_Park

Rotterdam - FediMeteo (@rotterdam@nl.fedimeteo.com)

Weer voor de stad Rotterdam Deze bot wordt beheerd door het FediMeteo-project. Voor informatie en contact kunt u de pagina https://fedimeteo.com raadplegen.

Weer voor Rotterdam ☁️ Huidige temperatuur (...

Weer voor Rotterdam ☁️

Huidige temperatuur (om 01:16): 7.6°C (Bewolkt)
Windsnelheid: 15.8 km/u (4.4 m/s), richting: ↙ 205°

Luchtkwaliteit:
  • AQI: 27 🟢 (Goed)
  • PM2.5: 6.3 μg/m³
  • PM10: 8.5 μg/m³

Voorspelling voor de komende dagen:

  • dinsdag 13 januari: Min 7.5°, Max 8.2° (Lichte motregen) 🌦️, Neerslag 0.8, Kans op neerslag 38%, Windsnelheid: 22.7 km/u (6.3 m/s), richting: ↓ 195°
  • woensdag 14 januari: Min 5.6°, Max 8.2° (Lichte regen) 🌧️, Neerslag 4.8, Kans op neerslag 31%, Windsnelheid: 21.6 km/u (6.0 m/s), richting: ↙ 244°
  • donderdag 15 januari: Min 5.8°, Max 8.3° (Zware motregen) 🌦️, Neerslag 1.9, Kans op neerslag 20%, Windsnelheid: 20.2 km/u (5.6 m/s), richting: ↓ 183°
  • vrijdag 16 januari: Min 6.3°, Max 10.1° (Lichte motregen) 🌦️, Neerslag 0.4, Kans op neerslag 18%, Windsnelheid: 21.9 km/u (6.1 m/s), richting: ↓ 177°
  • zaterdag 17 januari: Min 3.0°, Max 6.5° (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 8%, Windsnelheid: 12.6 km/u (3.5 m/s), richting: → 80°
  • zondag 18 januari: Min 0.5°, Max 5.2° (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 14%, Windsnelheid: 14.0 km/u (3.9 m/s), richting: → 97°
  • maandag 19 januari: Min 0.9°, Max 3.7° (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 30%, Windsnelheid: 9.6 km/u (2.7 m/s), richting: → 91°

Uurlijkse voorspelling voor de komende 12 uur:

  • 02:00: 7.8° (Gedeeltelijk bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 20%, Windsnelheid: 16.6 km/u (4.6 m/s), richting: ↙ 204°
  • 03:00: 7.8° (Gedeeltelijk bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 15%, Windsnelheid: 16.9 km/u (4.7 m/s), richting: ↙ 203°
  • 04:00: 7.9° (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 10%, Windsnelheid: 16.6 km/u (4.6 m/s), richting: ↙ 209°
  • 05:00: 8.1° (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 6%, Windsnelheid: 16.2 km/u (4.5 m/s), richting: ↙ 207°
  • 06:00: 7.9° (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 2%, Windsnelheid: 16.2 km/u (4.5 m/s), richting: ↙ 206°
  • 07:00: 8.2° (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 2%, Windsnelheid: 14.4 km/u (4.0 m/s), richting: ↓ 198°
  • 08:00: 7.8° (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 6%, Windsnelheid: 13.7 km/u (3.8 m/s), richting: ↓ 197°
  • 09:00: 7.9° (Mist) 🌫️, Kans op neerslag 14%, Windsnelheid: 13.0 km/u (3.6 m/s), richting: ↓ 186°
  • 10:00: 7.7° (Mist) 🌫️, Kans op neerslag 25%, Windsnelheid: 11.9 km/u (3.3 m/s), richting: ↓ 170°
  • 11:00: 7.6° (Mist) 🌫️, Kans op neerslag 45%, Windsnelheid: 13.7 km/u (3.8 m/s), richting: ↓ 165°
  • 12:00: 7.7° (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 70%, Windsnelheid: 14.0 km/u (3.9 m/s), richting: ↓ 177°
  • 13:00: 7.8° (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 84%, Windsnelheid: 13.3 km/u (3.7 m/s), richting: ↓ 171°
Gegevens geleverd door Open-Meteo



Thermometer

Mijn zoon van 5 jaar had overduidelijk geen zin om naar school te gaan. Hij gaf aan dat hij wel erg warm was en beter bij oma kon blijven.

Anil Dash

A blog about making culture. Since 1999.

How to know if that job will crush your soul

Last week, we talked about one huge question, “How the hell are you supposed to have a career in tech in 2026?” That’s pretty specific to this current moment, but there are some timeless, more perennial questions I've been sharing with friends for years that I wanted to give to all of you. They're a short list of questions that help you judge whether a job that you’re considering is going to crush your soul or not.

Obviously, not everyone is going to get to work in an environment that has perfect answers to all of these questions; a lot of the time, we’re lucky just to get a place to work at all. But these questions are framed in this way to encourage us all to aspire towards roles that enable us to do our best work, to have the biggest impact, and to live according to our values.

The Seven Questions

  • If what you do succeeds, will the world be better?

This question originally started for me when I would talk to people about new startups, where people were judging the basic idea of the product or the company itself, but it actually applies to any institution, at any size. If the organization that you’re considering working for, or the team you’re considering joining, is able to achieve their stated goals, is it ultimately going to have a positive effect? Will you be proud of what it means? Will the people you love and care about respect you for making that choice, and will those with the least to gain feel like you’re the kind of person who cares about their impact on the world?

  • Whose money do they have to take to stay in business?

Where does the money in the organization really come from? You need to know this for a lot of reasons. First of all, you need to be sure that they know the answer. (You’d be surprised how often that’s not the case!) Even if they do know the answer, it may make you realize that those customers are not the people whose needs or wants you’d like to spend most of your waking hours catering to. This goes beyond the simple basics of the business model — it can be about whether they're profitable or not, and what the corporate ownership structure is like.

It’s also increasingly common for companies to mistake those who are investing in a company with those who are their customers. But there’s a world of difference between those who are paying you, and those who you have to pay back tenfold. Or thousandfold.

The same goes for nonprofits — do you know who has to stay happy and smiling in order for the institution to stay stable and successful? If you know those answers, you'll be far more confident about the motivations and incentives that will drive key decisions within the organization.

  • What do you have to believe to think that they’re going to succeed? In what way does the world have to change or not change?

Now we’re getting a little bit deeper into thinking about the systems that surround the organization that you’re evaluating. Every company, every institution, even every small team, is built around a set of invisible assumptions. Many times, they’re completely reasonable assumptions that are unlikely to change in the future. But sometimes, the world you’re working in is about to shift in a big way, or things are built on a foundation that’s speculative or even unrealistic.

Maybe they're assuming there aren't going to be any big new competitors. Perhaps they think they'll always remain the most popular product in their category. Or their assumptions could be about the stability of the rule of law, or a lack of corruption — more fundamental assumptions that they've never seen challenged in their lifetime or in their culture, but that turn out to be far more fragile than they'd imagined.

Thinking through the context that everyone is sharing, and reflecting on whether they’re really planning for any potential disruptions, is an essential part of judging the psychological health of an organization. It’s the equivalent of a person having self-awareness, and it’s just as much of a red flag if it’s missing.

  • What’s the lived experience of the workers there whom you trust? Do you have evidence of leaders in the organization making hard choices to do the right thing?

Here is how we can tell the culture and character of an organization. If you’ve got connections into the company, or a backchannel to workers there, finding out as much information as you can about the real story of its working conditions is often one of the best ways of understanding whether it’s a fit for your needs. Now, people can always have a bad day, but overall, workers are usually very good at providing helpful perspectives about their context.

And more broadly, if people can provide examples of those in power within an organization using that power to take care of their workers or customers, or to fight for the company to be more responsible, then you’ve got an extremely positive sign about the health of the place even before you’ve joined. It’s vital that these be stories you are able to find and discover on your own, not the ones amplified by the institution itself for PR purposes.

  • What were you wrong about?

And here we have perhaps one of the easiest and most obvious ways to judge the culture of an organization. This is even a question you can ask people while you’re in an interview process, and you can judge their responses to help form your opinion. A company, and leadership culture, that can change its mind when faced with new information and new circumstances is much more likely to adapt to challenges in a healthy way. (If you want to be nice, phrase it as "What is a way in which the company has evolved or changed?")

  • Does your actual compensation take care of what you need for all of your current goals and needs — from day one?

This is where we go from the abstract and psychological goals to the practical and everyday concerns: can you pay your bills? The phrasing and framing here is very intentional: are they really going to pay you enough? I ask this question very specifically because you’d be surprised how often companies actually dance around this question, or how often we trick ourselves into hearing what we want to hear as the answer to this question when we’re in the exciting (or stressful) process of considering a new job, instead of looking at the facts of what’s actually written in black-and-white on an offer letter.

It's also important not to get distracted with potential, even if you're optimistic about the future. Don’t listen to promises about what might happen, or descriptions of what’s possible if you advance in your role. Think about what your real life will be like, after taxes, if you take the job that they’ve described.

  • Is the role you’re being hired into one where you can credibly advance, and where there’s sufficient resources for success?

This is where you can apply your optimism in a practical way: can the organization accurately describe how your career will proceed within the company? Does it have a specific and defined trajectory, or does it involve ambiguous processes or changes in teams or departments? Would you have to lobby for the support of leaders from other parts of the organization? Would making progress require acquiring new skills or knowledge? Have they committed to providing you with the investment and resources required to learn those skills?

These questions are essential to understand, because lacking these answers can lead to an ugly later realization that even an initially-exciting position may turn out to be a dead-end job over time.

Towards better working worlds

Sometimes it can really feel like the deck is stacked against you when you're trying to find a new job. It can feel even worse to be faced with an opportunity and have a nagging sense that something is not quite right. Much of the time, that feeling comes from the vague worry that we're taking a job that is going to make us miserable.

Even in a tough job market, there are some places that are trying to do their best to treat people decently. In larger organizations, there are often pockets of relative sanity, led by good leaders, who are trying to do the right thing. It can be a massive improvement in quality of life if you can find these places and use them as foundations for the next stage of your career.

The best way to navigate towards these better opportunities is to be systematic when evaluating all of your options, and to hold out for as high standards as possible when you're out there looking. These seven questions give you the tools to do exactly that.