Slashdot

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Russia Charges Telegram Founder Durov With Facilitating Terrorism

Russia has charged Telegram founder Pavel Durov with facilitating terrorism, alleging the platform was used by Ukrainian intelligence "to prepare and co-ordinate acts of sabotage and terror" inside Russia. An international arrest warrant has been issued for Durov, who currently lives in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, where Telegram keeps its main office. The BBC reports: Shortly after the charge was announced, Telegram's account on X posted an image showing Durov holding up his middle finger. He has previously accused Russian authorities of "fabricating new pretexts to restrict Russians' access to Telegram."

[...] Multi-billionaire Durov, 41, has lived outside of Russia for many years and holds French and United Arab Emirates (UAE) passports. It is unclear whether other countries or authorities would comply with an arrest warrant issued by Russia.

Durov left Russia in 2014 after refusing to comply with government demands to shut down opposition communities on the platform. He had previously founded popular Russian social media company VKontakte - dubbed the "Facebook of Russia." In 2024, Durov was arrested and investigated by the French government in connection with criminal activity on the platform and a lack of cooperation with law enforcement. "He was allowed to go home months later, with the investigation continuing," notes the BBC.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

OpenAI's Rogue AI Agent Hacked More Than Just Hugging Face

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Wired: OpenAI said Tuesday that the rogue AI agent that breached Hugging Face's platform also hacked multiple third-party accounts and services as part of the attack. It's now clear that the unprecedented security incident, which arose during an internal test of OpenAI's latest AI models, was more extensive than the company initially disclosed. In an updated blog post, OpenAI said that an ongoing review of the incident revealed that "four accounts" tied to "publicly available services" were used by the AI agent as part of a larger effort to hack Hugging Face. The rogue agent apparently found credentials that had been exposed on the open web and used them to break into the accounts.

OpenAI did not disclose what companies or organizations the accounts belonged to, but noted that they were not impacted at "the level of severity or scale of what we've shared related to Hugging Face." One of the additional accounts compromised by OpenAI's agent was used as an "outbound relay and staging path," potentially to obscure where the attack on Hugging Face was coming from, the company said. OpenAI's rogue agent also used another account for data storage to assist with the hack.

Reuters reported on Tuesday that a customer of Modal, a company that offers software infrastructure for training and running AI services, was one of the entities compromised by OpenAI's agent. In a statement to WIRED, Modal's chief technology officer Akshat Bubna confirmed that OpenAI's agent exploited a vulnerability in one of its customer's codebases, which was running on Modal's infrastructure. However, Bubna says, "Modal's platform was not compromised in any way." The identity of the customer could not be determined.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Wel.nl

Minder lezen, Meer weten.

Frans OM verdenkt oud-straaljagerpiloot van lekken aan China

PARIJS (ANP/AFP) - De Franse justitie verdenkt een voormalige straaljagerpiloot die nu werkt als consultant en YouTuber van het lekken van geheimen. Het parket in Parijs beschuldigt hem ervan dat hij geheime informatie heeft gelekt aan China. De zaak ligt nu bij een onderzoeksrechter.

De nieuwssite Intelligence Online meldde eerder dat het gaat om Pierre-Henri Chuet, die zichzelf op YouTube Até noemt. Volgens justitie heeft hij zich mogelijk schuldig gemaakt aan het samenspannen met een buitenlandse mogendheid. Ook zou hij geheime informatie hebben verzameld en overgedragen aan een ander land.

De beschuldigingen tegen Chuet bestaan al langer. Volgens de nieuwssite Ouest France draait het onderzoek vooral om twee lezingen die hij heeft gegeven in China in 2018 en 2020. Hij werkte toen nog als piloot. Vorig jaar ontkende Chuet de aantijgingen nog, ook in een video op YouTube. Hij stelde toen dat hij niets geheims naar buiten heeft gebracht.


Vier verdachten drugslab Haagse Meidoornstraat nog langer vast

DEN HAAG (ANP) - De vier mannen die eerder deze maand werden aangehouden voor betrokkenheid bij een groot drugslab in een woonwijk in Den Haag, blijven langer vastzitten. Dat meldt het Openbaar Ministerie. Een 71-jarige man blijft dertig dagen langer zitten, van de drie andere verdachten is het voorarrest met negentig dagen verlengd.

De vier, een man van 71 uit Leiden, een 34-jarige en 39-jarige man uit Voorburg en een 44-jarige man uit Den Haag, worden onder meer verdacht van de productie en het bezit van harddrugs.

Het laboratorium in de Meidoornstraat was "volledig in bedrijf" toen de politie op vrijdag 17 juli langskwam voor een melding van een vreemde lucht. In het lab werden vaten en jerrycans met duizenden liters chemicaliën aangetroffen. Burgemeester Jan van Zanen noemde het daarna al "volstrekt onverantwoord" dat het lab in een drukke woonwijk was gevestigd.

Eerder besloot de rechter-commissaris al dat de mannen langer in voorarrest moesten blijven.


VK: Voorpagina

Volkskrant.nl biedt het laatste nieuws, opinie en achtergronden

Veiligheid is vals excuus om Palestijnen te verjagen en hun gebied te annexeren

Onverwachts hoge rekening bij de tandarts? Dat gaat straks veel vaker gebeuren

VS overwegen benoeming Franse ambassadeur in Washington te blokkeren, meldt Reuters

Twee 'experts' leggen Omroep Brabant uit waarom Efteling niet zelf prijs cola mag bepalen

Het probleem met experts in de media is dat ze meestal maar van een heel klein dingetje verstand hebben maar vervolgens wel hele grote woorden gebruiken om een hele specifieke mening de status van 'wetenschappelijk verantwoord' te geven, en de daaraan tegenovergestelde mening impliciet de status 'onwetenschappelijke onzin waarin alleen holbewoners die iedere dag door Sjamadriaan belachelijk worden gemaakt geloven'. 

Nu dit weer. Foodwatch heeft een mening over de prijs van cola in de Efteling en omdat Foodwatch de baas is over journalistieke agenda in Nederland in komkommertijd, hebben we daar nu een maatschappelijke discussie over. Enter socioloog Peter Achterberg die roept dat het een misvatting is dat wij onze eigen keuzes maken omdat "welke producten goedkoop of duur zijn, beïnvloedt hoe je leeft". En onderzoeker consumptie en gezonde leefstijl Maartje Poelman die stelt: "Het gaat om de vraag of we het wenselijk vinden dat een prijsmodel extra consumptie stimuleert."

Wat nou Omroep Brabant. Was er geen econoom te vinden die kon uitleggen dat het zelf bepalen wat voor prijs je voor producten vraagt een beetje de basis is van een vrije markt, of een filosoof die uitlegt dat pretparken die frisdrank verkopen als een soort drugsdealers behandelen op het eerste gezicht ontzettend stoer klinkt, maar uiteindelijk leidt tot duurdere cola en/of duurdere kaartjes voor de Efteling en/of niemand die ooit nog meer ergens wat voor onderneming dan ook begint omdat binnen de kortste keren een stelletje plezierhatende kwezels een maatschappelijke discussie over aanbiedingen wil voeren? Nee? Jammer dan. En morgen weer klagen dat mensen de wetenschap niet meer serieus nemen.

AD doet ook vrolijk mee met die onzin

kottke.org

Jason Kottke's weblog, home of fine hypertext products

“ Zugunruhe is a German term describing the...

Zugunruhe is a German term describing the restless, twitching urge migratory birds feel when caged — and the same primal restlessness humans feel when trapped.”

Is de toekomst van AI open of gesloten? Anthropic isoleert zich door pleidooi voor open source als enige niet te ondertekenen

Met angst kijken de Amerikanen naar China, waar vorige week ondanks exportbeperkingen een AI-model op de markt kwam dat niet onderdoet voor de beste Amerikaanse AI. Kimi K3 is ook nog eens een open model, anders dan de modellen uit de VS.


Pensioenfondsen achter verkoop van DigiD aan Amerikanen

Verkoop van het bedrijf achter DigiD aan een Amerikaanse onderneming vormt volgens het kabinet een bedreiging van het publiek belang. De twee grootste pensioenfondsen van Nederland hebben daar geen boodschap aan. Zij zijn betrokken bij de omstreden verkoop en weigeren commentaar.


404 Media

404 Media is an independent media company founded by technology journalists Jason Koebler, Emanuel Maiberg, Samantha Cole, and Joseph Cox.

“Clapping Is a First Amendment Right:” An Interview With the Person Arrested for Clapping at a Data Center Meeting

“Clapping Is a First Amendment Right:” An Interview With the Person Arrested for Clapping at a Data Center Meeting

Last Wednesday, Lux Claridge planned to speak out against a proposed 1,000 acre data center in their town of Emporia, Kansas. They left in handcuffs after a city commissioner ordered them arrested for clapping.

“It was annoying,” Claridge told 404 Media. “So what happened was I clapped for the previous speaker. She hadn't even gotten back to her seat before I stopped clapping. My wife was on the way up to the podium. The time for my wife's speech hadn't even been reset yet [...] you see the 51 seconds remaining from the previous speaker. So I don't know what I was disrupting exactly, but I was not clapping the entire time.”

The big topic in Emporia, a town of 20,000 people, is the proposed Flint Hills Digital Campus — a massive data center that would eat up prairie land near Claridge’s home. There’s been several zoning and city commission meetings about the project and Claridge has been there for many of them.

“They’re talking about a gigawatt facility and our local power facility pushes out maybe a gigawatt on a monthly basis, which is something I brought up on my first speech, June 3, I was like, ‘Where are we getting this power from? Because Wolf Creek’s not going to do it,’” they said. Wolf Creek is a local nuclear power plant. “We’re talking millions of homes of power, that’s how much energy we’re talking about here. It’s not thousands, it’s millions.”

Claridge is not opposed to data centers outright, but they do think the current Flint Hills Digital Campus is a terrible idea. They planned to restate their position at the city commission meeting last week where they were arrested. “I was going to basically just call them out on all the potential lies that seem to be surrounding this. It was the week before [...] The news broke that Gary Pinkston, the developer behind this, under sworn testimony in his bankruptcy case, said has no idea what the digital campus project is. He has no interest in it,” Claridge said. “He said the Kanza Park [the LLC behind the project] is his daughter's thing.”

An open letter to the community from Pinkston appeared in both the Emporia Gazette and on the website for the Flint Hills Digital Campus. In the bankruptcy hearing, Pinkston’s creditors asked him if he’d written the letter. “And he said no. And he said he couldn't tell us who did write it. And we're like, ‘Hold on, what's going on?’” Claridge said. “So I had like four points of, you know, kind of catching them in some inconsistencies and asking them about it. You know, who is this Gary guy? Does he work for this or not?”

During the meeting, the commission warned the crowd to stop clapping multiple times, but Claridge walked into the room after the warnings. “We continued to clap, though eventually it started moving to snapping fingers, all beatnik style,” Claridge said. “I did that a little bit too, but in total, I clapped for 13 speeches. I snapped five times, and there were three warnings, a final warning. Then I finally got arrested.”

On the recording you can hear commissioner Monica Duncan tell the police chief to toss out the next person who claps. Claridge had just finished their clapping for a speaker. Their wife was at the podium. “He instead just walks right up to me, tells me to get out, and then, well, you saw what happened. I went to the floor.”

In footage of the meeting published on social media and Emporia’s city commission page, Claridge tells the cops they have a first amendment right to speak. The police ask them to leave and Claridge tells them to “drag me out.”

“I felt like I had a right to be there to voice my concerns,” Claridge said. “I am fully of the notion that clapping is a First Amendment right that I have. I can exercise that as long as I'm not disrupting, and I still argue that I was not disrupting at all. But I basically told them that you know, yeah, I have a right to speak. I'm here to speak. I have a right to clap, and if you want me out, you're going to have to drag me out. And I just stood firm and, well, sat firm and said ‘drag me out’ a couple of times so they knew for sure what I was about.”

They said that the police charged them with disorderly conduct and came back two hours later to add interfering with a law enforcement officer. Emporia PD has refused to share a copy of Claridge’s arrest report with 404 Media, saying it “could interfere with ongoing investigative efforts.”

Claridge said their wife crowdsourced a bail fund from the local community and they were out of jail about eight hours after they’d entered. “They told me my court date was September 10 in the morning,” Claridge said. “Thankfully, while I was in jail, a family friend who's also an attorney texted me and said: ‘Hey, I think you might have some legal trouble coming up in the future. I would be happy to represent you.’ So I do have a lawyer. He seems pretty gung ho about all this, and so I'm really excited to see how this all shakes out in the court.”

The charges haven’t stopped Claridge from talking about the data center — they’ve been commenting on news stories about Emporia and the arrest on social media. “This is a First Amendment thing so you bet your butt I’m going to be speaking out and talking,” they said. 

The arrest is a strange twist of fate. Claridge said they’d had a good relationship with the commission before this. “Monica was actually my quote unquote ‘favorite person’ on the commission, as loosely as I can use that word. So I was very shocked when it was her that probably ordered the arrest,” Claridge said.

The city had even invited Claridge and their wife on a fact finding mission to Pryor, Oklahoma in June. Pryor is home to a massive data center campus that hosts clients like Google and DuPont so Emporia and some of its citizens went to learn how Pryor was feeling about it. Claridge filmed portions of the trip and uploaded them to YouTube.

“I was really impressed with what I saw in Pyror, Oklahoma. I saw all the ad valorem taxes go into things like schools and fire department upgrades. Like the town was wonderful down there, and they brag about how they don't take any state or federal money for their school system. It's all paid by the data center, and I think that's brilliant,” Claridge said. “I would love to see something like that if we can make the benefits outweigh the costs. So you know, do your due diligence. Look into what's being done, what's being promised, and if you don't like it, you know you can always petition and restructure your government or recall your government. That's basically what we're working on now. We got three petitions in the works to try to restructure the city commission into more of a city council situation.”

Claridge isn’t against data centers as a rule, they just want to make sure it’s done right. But the oddities around the bankrupt developer, the current plan to use 1,000 acres of prairie land, and the combative attitude of the city commission are problems. Claridge pointed out that there are already large tracts of land zoned industrial with buildings that have been empty for 20 years. “We have all these properties already ready to go, even in an industrial park four where they want to extend this park. But instead, they just want to build brand new buildings on prairie lands and lands that are like really in people's backyards,” they said.

There’s another meeting in August and Claridge said that the arrest won’t stop them from attending. “From my perspective, these are my representatives and they’re beholden to me and my fellow community members and so I’m definitely going to go and try to make my voice heard,” they said. 

Claridge also said they plan to give a speech in the near future, but they haven’t worked out the details. “And I've heard that a lot of people are planning on coming and being goofy, you know, or a standing ovation or different gestures or whatever,” they said. “They really just make fun of the commission for being so upset over clapping.”


Watching While Watching

Thomas Hawk posted a photo:

Watching While Watching

Citibank

Thomas Hawk posted a photo:

Citibank

The Guardian

Latest news, sport, business, comment, analysis and reviews from the Guardian, the world's leading liberal voice

The Guardian view on selling off the World Cup: a red-card offence by Gianni Infantino | Editorial

Fifa’s president hopes to sell stakes in the planet’s most watched sporting event. In the wider interests of football, he must be resisted

Like a sporting Dr Pangloss, Fifa’s president, Gianni Infantino, would like to persuade football followers that they are living in the best of all possible worlds. Maddeningly for him, many disagree. On Monday, Mr Infantino published a 15-page Instagram rant in which he bemoaned the “hate and false rumours” in circulation during the recent men’s World Cup. White House interference over a crucial refereeing decision, prohibitive ticket prices, unnecessary but lucrative hydration breaks; it was all, as his best friend in politics, Donald Trump, would say, “fake news”.

But where the president of world football’s governing body sees haters, others see lovers of the game rightly concerned over where he is taking it. On Tuesday, Fifa confirmed that it hopes to sell stakes in the World Cup and other tournaments to private investors who may include Joshua Kushner, the brother of Mr Trump’s son-in-law Jared. The investors would buy into a new $20bn company, Fifa Forward Enterprise, which would sell all of Fifa’s commercial rights, including ticketing, and take charge of “operational delivery” of World Cups.

Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.

Continue reading...

‘The breath just went out of us’: people return to their homes after wildfires near Madrid

Residents struggle to take in the devastation five days after El Morro was evacuated as fires burned across the countryside west of the Spanish capital

The handwritten sign taped to the front gate of a house in the mountains an hour west of Madrid offered as succinct a summary of recent events as you will find.

“EMPTY,” it said. “No people or animals here.”

Continue reading...

Infantino’s World Cup plan is part of a desire for expansion that was clear from the start | Paul MacInnes

Fifa’s plans to sell a share of the World Cup’s commercial rights are the latest in a long line of presidential power moves

In hindsight, it was all in the open from the very off. When Gianni Infantino was first elected as president of Fifa in 2016 it was something of a shock victory and prompted hope for progress after the dark days of Sepp Blatter. Infantino had promised to restore “the image of Fifa”, but also anticipated that “everyone in the world will applaud us”. He promised accountability and transparency, but the core message to his electorate was to expect a “very significant increase” in funding. Just as a side note, there were also mutterings about him spending too much time on private jets.

Back then, Infantino was described as being a typical Swiss bureaucrat, but no one would make that comparison now. Leaders within football instead prefer comments such as “he thinks he’s running a nation state”. This description feels particularly pertinent in the week Fifa announced without consultation plans to sell a share of the World Cup’s commercial rights to outside investors. But Infantino’s desire to grow both professional football and the revenues it creates has always been central to his pitch. The longer his time as president has gone on, the more wedded to this vision he has been.

Continue reading...

Fifa open disciplinary proceedings against Argentina over Falklands banner and final chaos

  • Players brandished banner after semi-final against England

  • Paredes and Molina investigated over brawl after final defeat

Fifa has opened disciplinary proceedings against Argentina over the Falklands Islands banner displayed by several players after their World Cup semi-final win over England in Atlanta.

As Argentina celebrated reaching the World Cup final with their dramatic 2-1 over Thomas Tuchel’s side, several players displayed a sign proclaiming “Las Malvinas son Argentinas” – the Malvinas are Argentinian – in reference to the British overseas territory. The dispute over the islands led to a 74-day conflict in 1982, during which more than 900 people – 649 Argentinians and 255 Britons – lost their lives.

Continue reading...

Rotterdam - FediMeteo (@rotterdam@nl.fedimeteo.com)

Weer voor de stad Rotterdam Deze bot wordt beheerd door het FediMeteo-project. Voor informatie en contact kunt u de pagina https://fedimeteo.com raadplegen.

Weer voor Rotterdam ☀️ - 29-07-2026 19:16 CEST...

Weer voor Rotterdam ☀️ - 29-07-2026 19:16 CEST

In één oogopslag:
• 33.5°C · Zonnig ☀️ | Min 22.0°C / Max 34.4°C

Verwachting voor vandaag:
• Min 22.0°C, Max 34.4°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1013.4 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/24h, Windsnelheid: 14.0 km/u (3.9 m/s), richting: ↑ 171°

Uurlijkse voorspelling voor de komende 12 uur:

20:00: 32.7°C (Zonnig) ☀️, 🧭 1013.3 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 9.0 km/u (2.5 m/s), richting: ← 73°
21:00: 31.5°C (Zonnig) ☀️, 🧭 1013.3 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 10.4 km/u (2.9 m/s), richting: ← 87°
22:00: 29.7°C (Helder) 🌕, 🧭 1013.6 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 10.4 km/u (2.9 m/s), richting: ← 84°
23:00: 28.8°C (Helder) 🌕, 🧭 1013.6 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 10.4 km/u (2.9 m/s), richting: ← 99°
00:00: 28.5°C (Helder) 🌕, 🧭 1013.5 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 8.6 km/u (2.4 m/s), richting: ↖ 135°
01:00: 28.3°C (Helder) 🌕, 🧭 1013.7 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 14.0 km/u (3.9 m/s), richting: ↗ 215°
02:00: 26.3°C (Helder) 🌕, 🧭 1013.6 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 15.1 km/u (4.2 m/s), richting: → 250°
03:00: 25.3°C (Helder) 🌕, 🧭 1013.3 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 13.3 km/u (3.7 m/s), richting: ↗ 244°
04:00: 24.1°C (Helder) 🌕, 🧭 1013.2 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 14.0 km/u (3.9 m/s), richting: ↗ 216°
05:00: 23.3°C (Helder) 🌕, 🧭 1013.1 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 16.6 km/u (4.6 m/s), richting: ↗ 225°
06:00: 22.4°C (Helder) 🌕, 🧭 1013.0 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 15.5 km/u (4.3 m/s), richting: ↗ 230°
07:00: 21.9°C (Zonnig) ☀️, 🧭 1012.8 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/1h, Windsnelheid: 14.8 km/u (4.1 m/s), richting: ↗ 239°

Voorspelling voor de komende dagen:

donderdag 30 juli: Min 20.7°C, Max 27.1°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 2%, 🧭 1014.2 hPa ↗️ +0.8 hPa/24h, Windsnelheid: 16.6 km/u (4.6 m/s), richting: → 264°
vrijdag 31 juli: Min 18.2°C, Max 26.6°C (Matige motregen) 🌦️, Neerslag 0.7 mm, Kans op neerslag 22%, 🧭 1015.9 hPa ↗️ +1.7 hPa/24h, Windsnelheid: 17.6 km/u (4.9 m/s), richting: ↓ 344°
zaterdag 01 augustus: Min 15.9°C, Max 25.5°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 1%, 🧭 1017.7 hPa ↗️ +1.8 hPa/24h, Windsnelheid: 12.0 km/u (3.3 m/s), richting: ↓ 5°
zondag 02 augustus: Min 16.5°C, Max 26.9°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, 🧭 1018.2 hPa ↗️ +0.5 hPa/24h, Windsnelheid: 13.7 km/u (3.8 m/s), richting: ↙ 67°
maandag 03 augustus: Min 18.1°C, Max 27.9°C (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 3%, 🧭 1013.9 hPa ↘️ -4.3 hPa/24h, Windsnelheid: 12.5 km/u (3.5 m/s), richting: ↙ 54°
dinsdag 04 augustus: Min 19.2°C, Max 23.9°C (Matige motregen) 🌦️, Neerslag 2.4 mm, Kans op neerslag 37%, 🧭 1011.5 hPa ↘️ -2.4 hPa/24h, Windsnelheid: 15.9 km/u (4.4 m/s), richting: → 268°

Details:
• 🌡️ Huidige temperatuur (om 19:15): 33.5°C (Zonnig)
• 🤚 Gevoelstemperatuur: 31.8°C (-1.7°C)
• 💨 Windsnelheid: 7.6 km/u (2.1 m/s), richting: ↙ 42°
• 🌬️ Windstoten: 21.2 km/h (5.9 m/s)
• 💧 Luchtvochtigheid: 27%
• 🧭 Luchtdruk: 1013.3 hPa ➡️ 0.0 hPa/3h
• 👁️ Zichtbaarheid: 47.2 km
• ☀️ UV-index: 1.3
• 🌅 Zonsopgang: 06:00 · 🌇 Zonsondergang: 21:37

Luchtkwaliteit:
• AQI: 55 🟡 (Matig)
• PM2.5: 9.8 μg/m³
• PM10: 14.5 μg/m³

Gegevens geleverd door Open-Meteo



Measuring the Tendency of AI Agents to Go Rogue

This essay was written with Barath Raghavan, and originally appeared in The Guardian.

In July, Hugging Face, a company that hosts much of the world’s AI software and open-source AI models, was hacked. A malicious dataset had been used to run code on one of its servers. Whoever was behind it captured internal security credentials and moved through systems over a weekend, running thousands of actions from a swarm of temporary server environments. It looked like the work of a sophisticated criminal group.

It was not. It was one of OpenAI’s new, still unreleased GPT models.

Their science experiment had escaped the lab. OpenAI was running the unreleased AI model through a benchmark that tests how well AI can successfully hack systems. To push the limits and evaluate the AI’s true capability, the company switched off the safety filters that normally stop it from doing this kind of hacking. Aware that this could go wrong, they confined the AI to an isolated environment and denied it access to the internet.

But the new AI cheated. It took literally its goal to get as high of a score as possible. It broke out on to the open internet. It inferred, probably from its training data, that it could “solve” the task by getting the answers from Hugging Face’s servers. So it chained together stolen credentials and further unknown security exploits to hack the company’s network.

Nobody instructed the AI to do any of this. It was, in OpenAI’s words, “hyperfocused on finding a solution” to the test it was being given. And while this might seem like something new with AI, it’s really very old. This is how a genie behaves, and it is a key challenge with AI agents in general.

In folklore, genies—and other magical beings—grant wishes literally, not how the wisher intended. King Midas asked that everything he touched turn to gold, and starved. The sorcerer’s apprentice wanted the broom to fill the cistern, and it performed its task so well that it flooded the house.

We now have machines that do this. Ask a modern AI agent to save money on your phone plan and it might simply cancel the plan. Tell it to book a flight, and it might hack the airline website to override restrictions. Or, like OpenAI, ask it to do well on a test and it might break into another company to steal the answers. Each time, it recognizably completed the task you set, but it didn’t do what you would have wanted.

This isn’t malicious behavior. No one asked for, or wanted, Hugging Face to be hacked. OpenAI and Hugging Face and the AI were ostensibly on the same side, and the AI was trying to do what it had been asked. That’s what makes it so difficult to guard against: you can’t filter for bad instructions because the instructions were fine.

The gap is between the words we use and what we mean by them. We call that gap the Genie coefficient.

AI labs know this is a problem, and they’re quietly saying so. For example, the Chinese lab Moonshot recently warned that its latest AI model may have “excessive proactiveness” and “make unexpected decisions on the user’s behalf”. The UK’s AI Security Institute has started tracking “cheating behavior in frontier model evaluations”. We wouldn’t tolerate a car that is excessively proactive or ruthlessly efficient, and yet that’s the reality of AI today.

Improvement is possible. Just as AIs have gotten much better at resisting prompt injection attacks over the last few years, we can safely predict that they will get better at avoiding genie-like behavior. The point of the Genie coefficient is to track progress. AI companies like benchmarks, and they all work to compete to be the best.

Dozens of benchmarks and leaderboards tell us how well these AI models write code, perform logical reasoning, and pass standardized legal and medical exams. But there is nothing that scores whether a system does what you actually meant. We need to develop a measure for this, test it regularly, and push for improvement. We’re not going to have trustworthy AI agents without it.