Peter Kernwein posted a photo:
This month saw results from a yearlong global study of "potential negative risks that generative AI poses to student". The study (by the Brookings Institution's Center for Universal Education) also suggests how to prevent risks and maximize benefits:
After interviews, focus groups, and consultations with over 500 students, teachers, parents, education leaders, and technologists across 50 countries, a close review of over 400 studies, and a Delphi panel, we find that at this point in its trajectory, the risks of utilizing generative AI in children's education overshadow its benefits.
"At the top of Brookings' list of risks is the negative effect AI can have on children's cognitive growth," reports NPR — "how they learn new skills and perceive and solve problems."
The report describes a kind of doom loop of AI dependence, where students increasingly off-load their own thinking onto the technology, leading to the kind of cognitive decline or atrophy more commonly associated with aging brains... As one student told the researchers, "It's easy. You don't need to (use) your brain." The report offers a surfeit of evidence to suggest that students who use generative AI are already seeing declines in content knowledge, critical thinking and even creativity. And this could have enormous consequences if these young people grow into adults without learning to think critically...
Survey responses revealed deep concern that use of AI, particularly chatbots, "is undermining students' emotional well-being, including their ability to form relationships, recover from setbacks, and maintain mental health," the report says. One of the many problems with kids' overuse of AI is that the technology is inherently sycophantic — it has been designed to reinforce users' beliefs... Winthrop offers an example of a child interacting with a chatbot, "complaining about your parents and saying, 'They want me to wash the dishes — this is so annoying. I hate my parents.' The chatbot will likely say, 'You're right. You're misunderstood. I'm so sorry. I understand you.' Versus a friend who would say, 'Dude, I wash the dishes all the time in my house. I don't know what you're complaining about. That's normal.' That right there is the problem."
AI did have some advantages, the article points out:
The report says another benefit of AI is that it allows teachers to automate some tasks: "generating parent emails ... translating materials, creating worksheets, rubrics, quizzes, and lesson plans" — and more. The report cites multiple research studies that found important time-saving benefits for teachers, including one U.S. study that found that teachers who use AI save an average of nearly six hours a week and about six weeks over the course of a full school year...
AI can also help make classrooms more accessible for students with a wide range of learning disabilities, including dyslexia. But "AI can massively increase existing divides" too, [warns Rebecca Winthrop, one of the report's authors and a senior fellow at Brookings]. That's because the free AI tools that are most accessible to students and schools can also be the least reliable and least factually accurate... "[T]his is the first time in ed-tech history that schools will have to pay more for more accurate information. And that really hurts schools without a lot of resources."
The report calls for more research — and make several recommendations (including "holistic" learning and "AI tools that teach, not tell.") But this may be their most important recommendation. "Provide a clear vision for ethical AI use that centers human agency..."
"We find that AI has the potential to benefit or hinder students, depending on how it is used."
After interviews, focus groups, and consultations with over 500 students, teachers, parents, education leaders, and technologists across 50 countries, a close review of over 400 studies, and a Delphi panel, we find that at this point in its trajectory, the risks of utilizing generative AI in children's education overshadow its benefits.
"At the top of Brookings' list of risks is the negative effect AI can have on children's cognitive growth," reports NPR — "how they learn new skills and perceive and solve problems."
The report describes a kind of doom loop of AI dependence, where students increasingly off-load their own thinking onto the technology, leading to the kind of cognitive decline or atrophy more commonly associated with aging brains... As one student told the researchers, "It's easy. You don't need to (use) your brain." The report offers a surfeit of evidence to suggest that students who use generative AI are already seeing declines in content knowledge, critical thinking and even creativity. And this could have enormous consequences if these young people grow into adults without learning to think critically...
Survey responses revealed deep concern that use of AI, particularly chatbots, "is undermining students' emotional well-being, including their ability to form relationships, recover from setbacks, and maintain mental health," the report says. One of the many problems with kids' overuse of AI is that the technology is inherently sycophantic — it has been designed to reinforce users' beliefs... Winthrop offers an example of a child interacting with a chatbot, "complaining about your parents and saying, 'They want me to wash the dishes — this is so annoying. I hate my parents.' The chatbot will likely say, 'You're right. You're misunderstood. I'm so sorry. I understand you.' Versus a friend who would say, 'Dude, I wash the dishes all the time in my house. I don't know what you're complaining about. That's normal.' That right there is the problem."
AI did have some advantages, the article points out:
The report says another benefit of AI is that it allows teachers to automate some tasks: "generating parent emails ... translating materials, creating worksheets, rubrics, quizzes, and lesson plans" — and more. The report cites multiple research studies that found important time-saving benefits for teachers, including one U.S. study that found that teachers who use AI save an average of nearly six hours a week and about six weeks over the course of a full school year...
AI can also help make classrooms more accessible for students with a wide range of learning disabilities, including dyslexia. But "AI can massively increase existing divides" too, [warns Rebecca Winthrop, one of the report's authors and a senior fellow at Brookings]. That's because the free AI tools that are most accessible to students and schools can also be the least reliable and least factually accurate... "[T]his is the first time in ed-tech history that schools will have to pay more for more accurate information. And that really hurts schools without a lot of resources."
The report calls for more research — and make several recommendations (including "holistic" learning and "AI tools that teach, not tell.") But this may be their most important recommendation. "Provide a clear vision for ethical AI use that centers human agency..."
"We find that AI has the potential to benefit or hinder students, depending on how it is used."
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
INZELL (ANP) - Jenning de Boo is bij de laatste test voor de Olympische Spelen als vierde geëindigd op de 500 meter bij de laatste wereldbeker in Inzell. De regerend wereldkampioen kwam tot 34,37 en moest daarmee Jordan Stolz en de Polen Damian Zurek en Marek Kania voor zich dulden. Zurek klopte Stolz in een baanrecord van 34,06 tegen 34,10 voor Stolz.
De Boo was langzamer weg dan zijn tegenstander Jevgeni Kosjkin uit Kazachstan. Kosjkin ging in de tweede bocht onderuit en De Boo moest daarbij ook licht uitwijken. Hij kwam niet aan de derde tijd van 34,29 van Kania.
Stefan Westenbroek kwam tot 34,41 in de eerste rit. Hij werd zesde. Sebas Diniz verloor met 34,63 zijn rit tegen teamgenoot Marten Liiv uit Estland. Hij eindigde daarmee als elfde.
Stolz was al zeker van de eindzege in het wereldbekerklassement. De Amerikaan won dit weekend ook al de klassementen op de 1000 en 1500 meter. De Boo werd derde.
Jonge, veelbelovende trainers worden geprezen om hun tactisch vermogen. Toch lopen ze soms vast op het managen van grote ego’s. Carlo Ancelotti geldt hierin als buitengewoon tactvol. Wat is zijn geheim?
/s3/static.nrc.nl/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/25144443/250126SPO_2031030397_Trainers1.jpg)
Met een euforisch gevoel, na de historische overwinning in De Kuip, zal Sparta zich deze week hebben voorbereid op het uitduel met FC Utrecht. In tegenstelling tot het elftal van Maurice Steijn is de thuisploeg bezig aan een teleurstellend seizoen. Bij een overwinning in De Galgenwaard komt Sparta op gelijke hoogte met nummer vijf AZ.
Na de overwinning op Sturm Graz was er sinds een lange tijd weer een glimlachje te zien bij Feyenoord. Het elftal van Robin van Persie hoopt dat dit het begin is van de ommekeer. Zondagmiddag krijgt Feyenoord in De Kuip tegen hekkensluiter Heracles Almelo voor het eerst weer de kans om te laten zien dat deze week de start is van een nieuwe positieve reeks.
