Slashdot

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Ex-Governors, Big Tech Launch Coalition To Help Workers 'Navigate the AI Economy'

"Amid growing public anger over A.I. and a debate over how to regulate it, a group of employers, state governors and foundations has raised $500 million to try to answer some of those questions themselves," reports the New York Times.


"Just how many jobs will AI upend?" asks the Wall Street Journal, reporting that the new coalition says it's time to ready the U.S. workforce for a "major" disruption — no matter how large it turns out to be. The coalition "has so far raised more than $500 million — about half of its multiyear goal — from companies and nonprofit groups. It will initially work with state governments in Arkansas, Maryland, Utah and Connecticut. OpenAI and Anthropic are also involved, and academics including MIT economist David Autor sit on an advisory board."

[The new "RAISE US" coalition] will be led by former Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo, who served under former President Joe Biden, and former Indiana Gov. Eric Holcomb, a Republican. Its mandate, they said, isn't just to build retraining programs but also to reconsider decades-old policies such as unemployment insurance and act as a working lab for testing the most effective ways to transition workers to new fields. The group will explore corporate incentives for employers to hold on to workers whose jobs are disrupted by AI and prep them for new roles... The mission of the group is to "pull all the levers at once," Raimondo said. That means teaming up with employers to find ways to help workers gain skills or new roles and joining with educators to roll out different types of training. It also plans to propose policy changes such as tweaking unemployment benefits to let displaced workers continue to get them while they, for instance, start new businesses with AI... In Maryland, the group plans to expand a service-year option in the state to help people gain exposure to such growing fields as healthcare. An effort in Arkansas will focus on supporting "an AI-powered career navigation platform."


More from New York Times:

The organization will work primarily with governors... The theory: States generally control their community college systems, which can translate work force policy through course offerings and industry partnerships. The bulk of the budget will fund pilot programs overseen by about 15 staff members and consultants. For example, Maryland will expand a "service year" for recent high school graduates to provide experience in fields where there are shortages, such as health care. In other states, Raise Us hopes to offer "wage insurance" for workers who take lower-paying jobs rather than dropping out of the work force entirely.

The group plans to furnish technical assistance for companies that want to retain workers as A.I. changes their roles, rather than eliminating them. Microsoft, one of the companies backing the organization, said it had already found a promising model: cross-training its entry-level lawyers in different parts of the organization and equipping them with A.I. skills in order for them to be repositioned as technology evolves. "You can think of doing that with almost any job we have," said Brad Smith, vice chair and president at Microsoft. "It creates an opportunity to transfer people from jobs that are being eliminated to jobs that are being created...."

Ms. Raimondo and her colleagues are not fans of a universal basic income, an idea that has gained popularity in Silicon Valley as an answer to job disruption. They emphasize that work provides more than just wages, and plan to focus on helping people find pathways to new jobs. But it's unclear whether A.I. will create jobs at the rate that it will destroy them. Jack Malde studied work force policy for the Bipartisan Policy Center and is now going to work for the Windfall Trust, another A.I.-focused think tank. He said long-term income support might be necessary, even if better models for transitioning workers were found. "The truth is, there's still a lot of uncertainty," Mr. Malde said. "What we think is resilient now might not be resilient later. We're not going to get everything right, so we're going to need those strong safety-net programs."

Long-time Slashdot reader theodp writes:
If you think you've seen this movie before, prior to "partnering with governors, employers, and training partners to help the American workforce make a successful transition to an AI economy" with RAISE US, Raimondo and Holcomb partnered with governors, employers and training partners to help U.S. K-12 students make a successful transition to a CS economy with the Governors for Computer Science coalition.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Asteroid Threat

Paleontologists have long worried that the dinosaurs blasted into space 66 million years ago will one day complete their orbits and fall back down.

xiffy

Public posts from @xiffy@mastodon.nl

My screen is all covered in dots. The current was back online for half an hour, but then, you guessed it.
So 9 hours no electricity in Rotterdam, train from N. got canceled because disruption of the electricity for the train on the HSL.
Hopefully she can join me in France tomorrow.

@mbootsman
Lovely 😍 🌹
@lucp

thexiffy

Last.fm last recent tracks from thexiffy.

The xx - Crystalised (Edu Imbernon Remix)

The xx

Heartless Bastards - Only for You

Heartless Bastards

Juridische bijstand in asielzaken onder nieuwe EU-migratiepact loopt nu al mis: afspraken met asieladvocaten tijdelijk stopgezet

In de afgelopen dagen gingen „veel gesprekken” tussen advocaten en asielzoekers niet door vanwege „logistieke problemen”. Dat schrijft de Raad voor Rechtsbijstand. Gespreksuitnodigingen zouden niet op tijd zijn verstuurd, en vervoer voor asielzoekers zou niet worden geregeld.

Frankrijk kiest definitief Friese ijshal Thialf als plek voor langebaanschaatsen Olympische Spelen 2030

Het Rijk stelt dertig miljoen euro beschikbaar. Sportkoepel NOC-NSF spreekt van een „once in a lifetime’-kans” de Spelen deels „in eigen land” te houden.

VK: Voorpagina

Volkskrant.nl biedt het laatste nieuws, opinie en achtergronden

Met late zege op Japan (2-1) kan Brazilië nog steeds niet de scepsis bij de eigen fans wegnemen: ‘We hebben altijd grote teams gehad, dat geeft druk’

The Register

Biting the hand that feeds IT — Enterprise Technology News and Analysis

.NET's long-term support is not long-term enough, dev complains

Microsoft's support policy for its .NET runtime and development platform is too short for enterprises, according to a developer who has revived a long-standing complaint in a new GitHub issue. The current release lifecycle for modern .NET, formerly known as .NET Core, is an annual major release, with even-numbered versions being long-term support (LTS) for three years, and odd-numbered versions maintained for two years. The legacy and Windows-only .NET Framework, which is in maintenance, is defined as a component of Windows and therefore supported for much longer. Breaking changes are rare, but it is old and many libraries and application frameworks do not support it, including Microsoft's ASP.NET Core. Earlier this month, a developer opened an issue in the official .NET repository arguing that the LTS support window is "too short for upgrade and adoption cycles." The problem with the current three-year cycle is that by the time the next LTS release appears, two of those years have already elapsed, leaving just one year to upgrade. Even when they can get the upgrade done in time, potential customers "are hesitant to adopt software which is soon to run out of the defined EOL [end of life] window." Another developer commented: "I've got telemetry showing about 50 percent of the deployed versions of my software are running EOL versions." They also complained about the one-year upgrade window, saying: "I try to use netfx [.NET Framework] as much as I can because of the ten-year support tied to OS life but that's getting harder and harder as the ecosystem drops FX support." The problem is not new, but is becoming more pressing as .NET Framework ages. A similar complaint in 2023 drew comment from program manager Richard Lander, who said: "We chose the support time frames to enable a balance between stable deployment time for users and enabling the team to spend most of their time innovating." He said that Microsoft had discussed longer support time frames and extended paid support offerings but has "opted to continue with only the free support plan." Microsoft's free support period is shorter than that offered for some other platforms including Java (five years plus extended support for LTS versions) and Python (five years security fixes for all releases). Upgrading from one .NET version to another can sometimes be done easily, but complications include breaking changes, third-party dependencies that may also need updating, the usual testing and deployment cycle, and in some cases paying external developers for the upgrade. "The .NET Framework only incurs costs for functional modifications and bug fixes, but .NET tries to add to that the non-negligible cost of version upgrades at relatively short intervals," said a comment to the 2023 issue. In March, Microsoft principal software engineer Shay Rojansky requested feedback on dropping .NET Framework support in the Microsoft.Data.Sqlite library, drawing the comment that "right now .NET Standard 2.0 and framework 4.8 are the only .NET targets with reasonable support timelines available for enterprise." The .NET Standard 2.0 specifies a common set of APIs implemented by .NET Framework and modern .NET releases, including .NET 10. Rojansky said the comment was off-topic, yet it is a factor in the enduring use of .NET Framework, which in turn may explain why the proposal was closed as "not planned." ®