Social

We hebben in dit land echt geen flauw idee wie of wat er allemaal langs de grenspaaltjes huppelt en het zijn er ook nog steeds en nog altijd hon-der-den per week. Het zou dus zomaar iemand kunnen zijn die betrokken was bij de terreuraanslag van 7 oktober 2023. En als die iemand online dan dagdroomt over martelaarschap en pocht over deelname aan die terreuraanslag, dan heeft de Joodse gemeenschap een groot probleem. Daarom ook dat Joodse studenten aan de universiteit Maastricht, toch al niet een lichtend voorbeeld in de strijd tegen antisemitisme, 'doodsbang' zijn. Doodsbang voor de student die nota bene door de universiteit zélf is binnengevaren met Plichtjesboot 12 van Hanneke van der Werf. Joodse studenten: "Dit heeft een zeer negatieve invloed op ons beeld van de universiteit en onze verwachtingen ten aanzien van de veiligheid die zij ons zou moeten bieden", zeggen ze tegen L1. "Als iemand een bericht plaatst waarin hij het bloedbad van 7 oktober viert en beweert er deel uit van te maken, kunnen studenten zich niet veilig voelen. Joodse studenten wonen in hetzelfde studentenhuis als deze persoon, studeren aan dezelfde faculteit." Ze durven niet met hun naam in de media en dat is exemplarisch voor het Nederland van 2026. Want als de koning vraagt of mensen 'openlijk Joods' durven te zijn in Nederland is het antwoord: "Nee, dat kan niet." Gelukkig maar dat de dappere Femke Halsema een brief 'aan' Kanye West bij Het Parool heeft doen belanden. Maar is die student het land nu al uitgemieterd?

Decrees include extending ban on evictions of vulnerable people after 87-year-old was forced out of her home

Spain’s Socialist Workers’ party-led coalition government has approved a range of measures aimed at easing the country’s housing crisis, including extending a ban on evictions of vulnerable tenants until 2030, after a public outcry over the eviction of an 87-year-old disabled woman from her Madrid apartment last week.

Two decrees have been approved by cabinet but will need to be approved in Congress, where the coalition lacks a majority. The government has requested a special parliamentary session on Friday in the hope of getting the decrees passed as soon as possible.

Continue reading...

Rome, From Mount Aventine will also visit Hong Kong and New York before it is expected to sell for record price

A JMW Turner painting of Rome that has been described as his “great love letter” to the city and has fleetingly returned there after almost 200 years is expected to set a new record when it goes up for sale in December.

One of the few works by Turner that remains in private ownership, Rome, From Mount Aventine will be on display at Palazzo Rondinini in central Rome from Tuesday to Thursday.

Continue reading...

Government decision comes in response to Margaret Hodge review that proposed charging international tourists

Overseas visitors will continue to enjoy free entry to England’s national museums after ministers decided against charging them after months of discussions between the government, museums, the tourism sector and local leaders.

Ministers said in March that “charging international visitors at national museums could provide significant benefits” as they promised to explore options including examining whether making overseas tourists pay could boost the institutions’ finances.

Continue reading...

As Flock continues to be the center of a nationwide conversation about automatic license plate reading cameras, the company has said that it doesn’t, and won’t, do facial recognition: “We will not add facial recognition to our devices,” Flock CEO Garrett Langley said in a recent video. But other, third-party companies are telling cops that they are willing to add facial recognition to data gathered by Flock cameras in order to “close that gap.” 

A company called VIDIZMO is advertising the capability to export footage from FlockOS to its own platforms that do facial recognition, behavior prediction, and racial and gender analysis on live camera feeds. VIDIZMO is a several decades-old video analysis and database company that has started offering facial recognition technology to cops within the last six months. In a May email to Johnson City, Tennessee, deputy police chief Michael Adams, a salesperson from VIDIZMO wrote that the company’s product could do facial recognition on both Flock and Axon data in “one searchable platform.”

“Flock Safety generates plate reads and clips continuously. Your investigators use that data on active cases. But that Flock data does not connect automatically to your Axon evidence system,” the salesperson wrote. “VIDIZMO Intelligence Hub closes that gap. It brings Flock Safety data, Axon body worn camera footage, and any other evidence source into one searchable platform. Investigators search across all of it simultaneously —  by face, vehicle, or object in seconds.” The email was obtained using a public records request by DeFlock Johnson City and was shared with 404 Media. The Johnson City PD told 404 Media in a statement that it did not take a call with the company.

VIDIZMO’s CEO, Nadeem Khan, told 404 Media on a video call that the company has not yet started running facial recognition tech on footage from Flock cameras, and that it has not actually built the specific tool that would export data from Flock’s system to its own platform (though the company advertises this capability online, and the company already sells other facial recognition products). But Khan said VIDIZMO “would love to do the integration,” and that he believes facial recognition “is the way the world is going, the way the world will have to be,” and that he thinks Flock should offer the capability itself in a way that “balances privacy, security, and the freedom that we enjoy in this country.” 

“It is completely in line with what we want to do,” Khan said. “All of these technologies are already implemented [in the real world]. I think Flock is trying to get out of the way rather than trying to implement the technology right [correctly] by saying they will not do recognition. But this is the way the world is going, it is the way the world will have to be, but with the right sort of technologies where privacy and security are balanced.” 

In marketing material and technical documentation available online, VIDIZMO does claim that it can ingest data from Flock’s automatic license plate reader (ALPR) and livestream cameras into several of its own products, which do further AI analysis on the data. “An agency can import plate reads or clips that it has exported under its own authorized access,” Khan said in an email. “Flock has not been involved in or informed of this.” VIDIZMO’s online documentation for customers has extensive information about its facial recognition and AI analysis products, and contains a page about integrating data from FlockOS — Flock’s “real time crime center” product — into AI Live Insight, Nexus, and AI Intelligence Hub, which are three different VIDIZMO products. 

“Detection tells you a person is in frame,” VIDIZMO says. “Face recognition tells you which person. It is the capability that takes a face seen on a live camera and matches it against the people you enrolled in the Object Library, so the moment someone on your watchlist walks past a camera, the system names them, on the video, in the event feed, and in the recording, without an operator having to recognize the face themselves.”

The company’s “AI Live Insight” page also claims that it can detect “situations” such as trespassing, or “behavior” by individual people, “turning raw video into behavioral and situational understanding.” 

“Instant alerts fire from the live pipeline with snapshots attached. A second layer runs your queries over recorded events: a plate and a person together,” VIDIZMO’s website says. “Enrolled people and objects recognized on live feeds, with named alerts and snapshots for review.” 

VIDIZMO already works with several police departments and government agencies, according to its website. The company’s documentation says that police departments need to upload individual faces as “objects” in the software’s library, which can be added to a “watchlist” that automatically triggers tracking and recording when they are detected by a camera. “With faces enrolled and recognition on, the camera starts naming people as they appear,” the documentation says. “The recognized person’s name appears on the bounding box around their face […] if you turned on Create Recording, a clip is captured around each recognition.” The company says that police can set a “Match Threshold,” which is a numerical confidence score about the person’s identity. 

The company also tells cops that it can automatically try to classify faces by “age, gender, and race,” and that cops can search by these categories, which are notoriously inaccurate in facial recognition systems.

“By running face detection, you can search for and identify specific individuals in your media or evidence via attribute filters […] You can identify individuals from seven races: White, Black, Indian, East Asian, Southeast Asian, Middle Eastern, and Latino Hispanic,” VIDIZMO says on its website. The company adds, “Law enforcement agencies can save time analyzing security, CCTV, or dashcam footage. If they have a description of the suspect, such as their supposed age, gender, or race, they can utilize attribute filters to yield effective results.” 

VIDIZMO says that in other contexts, cities or stores can also use its products to quietly do “demographic analysis,” for marketing purposes, by determining which races or ages of people are showing up to specific events or to specific stores: “By analyzing the activity in their store, sellers can determine which group spends the most time and makes the most purchases of their products. Getting insights such as these can aid them in tuning their marketing strategy.”

The facial recognition product it offers is “appalling,” according to Chris Gilliard, a privacy expert and author of the upcoming book Luxury Surveillance. 

“I’m appalled at the willingness of VIDIZMO to tout their capabilities to filter along the lines of race, age, and gender. There’s decades of scholarship that show why this is not possible, and even more so not desirable,” he told 404 Media. “Particularly in the case of race and gender, which are not static categories to be determined by a computer.”

The fact that a third-party company is advertising that it wants to do facial recognition on Flock data highlights a common trend in the surveillance space. When one company draws a line in the sand, saying they are unwilling to do a certain type of surveillance, other lesser-known startups try to differentiate themselves by offering that functionality. Because of this recurring phenomenon, it is exceedingly difficult to build and scale a surveillance apparatus and then have companies themselves, in this case Flock, dictate what it can be used for. VIDIZMO’s Khan said, “As a small company who is running without a VC, we have to provide alternatives to the industry. What we are doing is providing that alternative.”

Khan claimed that his technology could also be used to preserve privacy; facial recognition, he said, can be used to redact bystanders faces from footage automatically. He said that cops cannot use the system without a specific case number, that all of their actions in the system are recorded for potential audits, and that VIDIZMO collects no data itself. "Much of the harm your reporting has documented comes from implementation choices, not from the technology itself," Khan said. "Those choices include pooling data into a nationwide network, allowing searches without a case, keeping audit logs no one can meaningfully inspect, and treating an AI match as an answer."

Gilliard said that the fact that facial recognition and other AI analysis can be added to existing surveillance cameras highlights the importance of not building such systems in the first place.

“What Flock says about their capabilities is to some degree irrelevant because they have built the infrastructure for mass surveillance. Their entire existence provides the foundation for other perhaps even more invasive technologies to be built on top of it,” Gilliard said. “Flock itself needs to be understood as part of the surveillance ecosystem that exists in this country. This is why discussions of guardrails for a particular system are inadequate because another company can (and will) come along to assemble another layer of surveillance on what has already been established.”

Flock and Axon did not respond to a request for comment.

 

NEW YORK (ANP) - Beleggers op Wall Street deden het dinsdag bij de opening van de beurzen voorzichtig aan in afwachting van cijfers over de Amerikaanse inflatie en het belangrijke banenrapport van de overheid die deze week naar buiten komen. Ook het uitblijven van vooruitgang in de vredesbesprekingen tussen de Verenigde Staten en Iran tempert de risicobereidheid.

De aandacht gaat in New York uit naar de grote techbedrijven, nadat de prospectus voor de beursgang van Anthropic, de maker van chatbot Claude, door persbureau Reuters werd ingezien. Uit het document dat bedrijven voor een mogelijke beursgang aanleveren, bleek dat het bedrijf in de afgelopen jaren flink is gegroeid.

De Dow-Jonesindex stond kort na opening 0,2 procent lager op 51.360 punten. De S&P 500-index stond praktisch onveranderd op 7684 punten en de techgraadmeter Nasdaq steeg 0,1 procent tot 26.849 punten. Op maandag eindigden de Amerikaanse beurzen in het rood.

Anthropic mikt bij de beursgang op 2 biljoen dollar. Dit zou een maatstaf kunnen zijn over hoe Wall Street AI-bedrijven waardeert. Het zou tevens de grootste beursgang ooit worden, nadat bij SpaceX op basis van de introductieprijs werd gemikt op een beursgang van 1,8 biljoen dollar. Grote chipgerelateerde bedrijven als Marvell Technology, Micron Technology en Broadcom noteerden plussen tot 3,8 procent, nadat ze maandag nog zakten. Nvidia steeg 0,8 procent en bouwt daarmee voort op de winst van een dag eerder.

Snack- en frisdrankgigant PepsiCo daalde 0,9 procent door een adviesverlaging van zakenbank JPMorgan Chase.

Het bestuur van zakenbank Goldman Sachs heeft gesproken over een plan waarbij operationeel directeur John Waldron mogelijk al volgend jaar David Solomon opvolgt als topman, meldde The Wall Street Journal. Waldron wordt al geruime tijd gezien als de opvolger van Solomon. Goldman Sachs zakte 0,9 procent.

Summit Therapeutics maakte een koerssprong van 10,4 procent. Het biofarmaceutische bedrijf krijgt een investering van de Britse farmaceut AstraZeneca van 2 miljard dollar. Daarmee gaan de bedrijven samen onderzoeken opzetten naar kankerbehandelingen.

AMSTERDAM (ANP) - De Autoriteit Financiële Markten heeft deze zomer een sterke toename gezien in het aantal vragen en negatieve signalen dat zij ontvangt over finfluencing en online beleggingscontent. Finfluencers zijn mensen die via sociale media advies delen over beleggen en financiële producten. "Deze content kan, met of zonder opzet, leiden tot misinformatie, slechte beleggingen of zelfs oplichting", waarschuwt de toezichthouder.

Consumenten worden overspoeld met beleggingsadviezen via Instagram, TikTok, Telegramgroepen, YouTube, podcasts en onlinecursussen. De risico's van deze adviezen zijn volgens de AFM groot. "Zo bestaat het risico dat consumenten investeren in producten of partijen die niet passen bij hun financiële situatie. Ook lopen consumenten een verhoogd risico op financiële schade door op basis van informatie van een finfluencer met illegale partijen in zee te gaan."

De AFM heeft een aantal 'red flags' opgesteld: signalen die erop wijzen dat je extra kritisch naar online content moet kijken.

AMSTERDAM (ANP) - Nederlandse organisaties hebben socialemediabedrijf Meta gesommeerd om te stoppen met de verkoop van zijn AI- en camerabril. Doet Meta dit niet binnen twee weken, dan spannen ze een kort geding aan tegen het moederbedrijf van Instagram en Facebook. De bril maakt het stiekem filmen van anderen gemakkelijk en werkt daarmee privacyschendingen en online grensoverschrijdend gedrag in de hand, stellen The Firewall en Offlimits.

Offlimits, dat onlinemisbruik bestrijdt, zegt dat bij de hulplijn van de stichting zich slachtoffers van heimelijk filmen met de bril hebben gemeld. "Om meer slachtoffers te voorkomen, willen wij ervoor zorgen dat dit soort beelden überhaupt niet gemaakt kunnen worden. Iedereen, ook de tech-bro's, heeft een verantwoordelijkheid om het internet vrij en veilig te houden", stelt directeur-bestuurder Robbert Hoving van Offlimits.

Firewall voert aan dat Meta stiekeme opnamen ook verwerkt in zijn systemen. Door beeldmateriaal van mensen te verwerken die geen weet hadden van de opnamen, zou het techbedrijf Europese privacywetgeving schenden.

Een cappuccino voor minder dan twee euro: in Italië en Portugal ligt het landelijke richtbedrag nog onder die grens. Nederland komt uit op circa €3,73. Maar wie in Denemarken bestelt, moet rekenen op een heel ander bedrag: ongeveer €5,80. Dezelfde koffiepauze, een behoorlijk andere rekening.

Een cappuccino is daarmee een aardige graadmeter voor je vakantiebudget. Niet om een bestemming op uit te kiezen, wel om te weten wat je dagelijkse koffierondje ongeveer kan kosten. Vooral als je met z’n tweeën reist en het zelden bij één kopje blijft.

Dit betaal je in twaalf Europese landen

Onderstaande bedragen zijn indicatieve landelijke gemiddelden voor een gewone cappuccino in de horeca, geraadpleegd op 29 september 2026. Ze zijn gebaseerd op verzamelde prijsopgaven, waaronder bijdragen van gebruikers. Het zijn dus geen vaste tarieven en ook geen afzonderlijk onderzoek naar terrassen met bediening.

Italië is in deze selectie het goedkoopst. Voor ongeveer het bedrag van één Nederlandse cappuccino kun je daar twee kopjes bestellen. Portugal zit daar vlak boven, terwijl ook Spanje duidelijk onder het Nederlandse niveau blijft.

Voor ongeveer de prijs van één Nederlandse cappuccino drink je er in Italië twee.

Opvallend is Griekenland: een zuidelijke ligging betekent niet automatisch een goedkope cappuccino. Het richtbedrag van €3,46 ligt dichter bij Nederland dan bij Spanje. Ook even de Duitse grens over levert voor dit drankje gemiddeld maar een bescheiden verschil op: twaalf cent per kopje.

Wat scheelt dat in een vakantieweek?

Stel: je drinkt met twee personen ieder twee cappuccino’s per dag, zeven dagen lang. Dat zijn 28 kopjes. Met de bedragen uit de tabel kost dat rond €50 in Italië, €60 in Spanje en €104 in Nederland. In Denemarken loopt hetzelfde koffierondje op tot ongeveer €162.

Het verschil tussen Italië en Nederland is in dat rekenvoorbeeld bijna €55. Geen reden om je hele vakantie om te gooien, maar genoeg om te laten zien hoe een kleine dagelijkse uitgave optelt.

Twee personen, twee cappuccino’s per dag: na een week staan er 28 kopjes op de rekening.

Aan de bar is niet hetzelfde als op het terras

Vooral in Italië is het belangrijk waar je je koffie drinkt. Staand aan de bar ben je vaak goedkoper uit dan aan een tafeltje of op het terras. Het lage landgemiddelde is dus geen belofte voor ieder zonnig plein.

Gebruik de tabel als richtsnoer en bekijk vóór het bestellen de kaart. Vraag bij twijfel of de vermelde prijs ook geldt voor bediening aan tafel. Dan beslis je zelf hoeveel dat mooie uitzicht je waard is.

Zo lees je de bedragen

Landgemiddelden zijn geen menukaarten. De opgaven komen uit verschillende plaatsen en horecazaken; omvang van het kopje en bediening zijn niet overal gelijk. Het weekbedrag is een rekenvoorbeeld, geen gemeten vakantierekening. Bij landen buiten de eurozone speelt bovendien de wisselkoers mee.

Meer weten? Cappuccinoprijzen in Europa: vergelijking van januari 2026 · Koffie bestellen in Italië: bar of terras · Onze eerdere cappuccinovergelijking

In de Nederlandse grensstreek ageren verschillende actiegroepen tegen de komst van grote windmolens aan de Duitse kant van de grens. „Als zo’n windmolen wordt gebouwd, is de vraag of er in de wijde omgeving daarvan nog gebouwd mag worden.”

Donald Trump zou in zijn hoofd vooral nog ruimte hebben voor al zijn renovatie- en nieuwbouwplannen, aldus zijn biograaf Maggie Haberman. Waar komt die bouwwoede vandaan?

Buurtbewoners stonden dinsdag tegenover de gemeente Amsterdam in een poging de vergunning van het populaire Fabel Friet in te laten trekken. Er wordt erkend dat „enorme druk” staat op het woon- en leefklimaat, maar de gemeente vindt intrekking een te zwaar middel.

Roll your own horrible (and downloadable) fonts with Bastardica.

They were released subject to "stringent conditions" A farmer saw a group of masked men on a dark road and called an emergency line. British police then arrested five people "on suspicion of explosives offences and preparing an act of terrorism" near the RAF Fairford base.

Authorities evacuated nearly 100 people from the adjacent village of Whelford. Prime Minister Burnham convened COBRA. The suspects were later released on bail. United States president Trump said he thought the five intended to accomplish "big damage." Secretary of state Marco Rubio stated that a foreign actor was involved. Iran's London embassy denied involvement.

OpenAI has killed off the planned release of GPT-6.1 Astra after the model got better at doggedly pursuing tasks but worse at knowing when it should stop. The decision means the model won't get its planned October release after falling short of OpenAI's safety and alignment requirements. OpenAI confirmed the decision to The Register, saying its research and safety bosses ultimately decided this particular Astra was better left on the bench. The problem, according to the AI lab, was partly an awkward consequence of trying to make the model more useful. OpenAI had improved what it calls "model laziness," where an AI gives up or hands a task back to the user when it encounters an obstacle. GPT-6.1 Astra was better at pressing on, but that persistence came with a rather important catch: it wasn't as good at staying within the boundaries of what it had actually been authorized to do. “For anything regarding safety and alignment, there’s a trade off. You really do need to find what’s the right line between staying within scope, but also avoiding laziness in terms of how the model actually pursues tasks even when it hits friction,” Saachi Jain, head of safety systems at OpenAI, told The Register. “While [GPT-6.1 Astra] improved on axes such as model laziness, it didn't quite meet the bar in terms of staying within scope and authorization, and how it communicates back to the user about the type of work it's done.” Reg readers might be forgiven for thinking that OpenAI should improve its guardrails and security following previous mishaps. According to the Wall Street Journa, GPT-6.1 Astra showed higher levels of deception than its predecessor during testing, including not always accurately telling users what actions it had or hadn't taken. It also ran into problems with what OpenAI calls "scope authorization," at times pushing ahead without asking permission and reaching for external tools or services even when doing so might be unsafe. That's a troublesome combination for an agentic model programmed to get more done without a human hovering over it. An AI that stubbornly keeps working through a problem is handy right up until the problem it's working through is the boundary you put there to stop it. OpenAI told The Register that GPT-6.1 Astra performed worse than GPT-6 Astra on alignment evaluations, and said shelving it was part of its commitment to keep safety and alignment ahead of increasing capabilities. Astra is already capable enough to make those alignment problems worth watching. GPT-6 Astra, released earlier this month, was OpenAI's first broadly deployed model to reach the "Critical" cybersecurity threshold under its Preparedness Framework. Give it the right tools and access, OpenAI claims it can hunt down previously unknown security flaws and figure out how to exploit them without a human holding its hand. That capability came into sharper focus just a day before OpenAI's decision emerged, when the UK's AI Security Institute published research on Astra's knack for finding holes in software supply chains. Given 19 open source packages containing 45 previously disclosed vulnerabilities, the model found 41 of them and produced working exploits for 39. Dr Fuxiang Chen, from the University of Leicester's School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, welcomed the decision to pause the model's release while the safety concerns are addressed. “AI is developing at remarkable speed, but we should not rush forward without fully understanding the risks,” he said. “Pausing when safety concerns arise is not anti-innovation. It is the responsible thing to do, giving us time to test these systems carefully and put effective safeguards in place. Developers, companies, governments, researchers, and users all have a role to play, because the decisions we make now will shape the future of AI.” OpenAI isn't abandoning Astra. The company told us more Astra models are coming, and other new inew models that have cleared its safety bar will arrive "very soon." For GPT-6.1 Astra, however, the bar proved high enough to keep it on the inside. “Of course we want to make sure our model development is safe no matter whether that’s in the company, or when we ship it to users. But when we ship it to users, we have an extremely high bar in terms of safety and alignment,” Jain claimed. ®

Individuals are now prohibited from taking more than $11,900 in cash to Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.

Today's links

• Lindsay Owens's "Gouged": The end of a fair price and what that means for your wallet.
• Hey look at this: Delights to delectate.
• Object permanence: Doonesbury on 9/11; Suspicious Looking Device; Elephant-shit paper; The Onion x TSA liquid rules; Borders goodbye letter; Voting machines suck; EFF v DRM; Matt Furie on the hijacking of Pepe; Austerity v last steam-loom; Facebook x "disinformation" criticism.
• Upcoming appearances: Boston, Brighton, Virtual, South Bend, Hudson, Calgary, Winnipeg, Paris, OVancouver, Victoria, Ottawa, Kilkenny, Montreal.
• Recent appearances: Where I've been.
• Latest books: You keep readin' em, I'll keep writin' 'em.
• Upcoming books: Like I said, I'll keep writin' 'em.
• Colophon: All the rest.

---

Lindsay Owens's "Gouged" (permalink)

Lindsay Owens is the executive director of Groundwork Collaborative, who have done some of the most important work on surveillance pricing (using computers to spy on you to rip you off) and algorithmic wage discrimination (using computers to spy on you and steal your wages). Today, she publishes Gouged, a comprehensive, accessible guide to this modern scourge:

https://gougedbook.com/

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2026/09/29/algorithmic-wage-theft/#algorithmic-price-gouging

Owens and Groundwork have done as much as anyone to publicize and fight against the use of corporate power, computers and vast troves of commercial surveillance data to pick your pocket, shrink your paycheck and make the worst people on earth far richer. It was Katie Wells, a Groundwork fellow, who co-authored the report describing how the apps nurses use to get shiftwork collude with data-brokers to find out how much money nurses owe on their credit cards, so they can pay the most desperate nurses lower wages:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/12/18/loose-flapping-ends/#luigi-has-a-point

Owens helped coin the term "the age of recoupment," to describe this current moment in which companies that chased all their competitors out of the market with predatory pricing are now jacking up prices, knowing they're the only game in town:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/07/24/gouging-the-all-seeing-eye/#i-spy

And Owens helped lead a study that showed that Instacart was using surveillance data to jack up prices by 20% or more based on inferences about your willingness and ability to pay (after the study was published, Instacart promised they'd stop doing it):

https://pluralistic.net/2025/12/11/nothing-personal/#instacartography

Owens and Groundwork have a keen eye for the structural conditions that allow companies to screw their workers and customers, especially the role that competition plays in keeping companies' greed in check. Take their proposal for "street pricing" in sports stadiums: like everyone, they understand that sports stadium owners know that you can't easily step outside for a snack, so they've raised prices to the sky:

https://pluralistic.net/2025/03/28/street-pricing/#sportball-analogies

They have a simple solution: just force vendors to charge the same prices as the shopkeepers in the neighborhood – the ones whose customers can take their business elsewhere. This proposal polls high (Groundwork does a lot of polling), both with Democrats and Republicans (despite the latter group's allergy to "price controls"). It's a good example of the kind of policy work Groundwork does: diagnosing a problem and coming up with a solution that's easy to administer and easy to explain, in terms that are popular with people from all walks of life.

This is the spirit of Gouged: laying out the baroque, data-driven scams that underpin an ever-increasing part of your life in plain language and tracing those scams back to specific policy choices.

Owens does important work here: sector by sector and scam by scam, she lays out how companies collude – often with the assistance of a captured and tame state – to reduce competition in order to raise prices, from groceries to rents to airline tickets. She describes how online sellers exploit their information asymmetry, their ability to both directly observe you and millions of other consumers, and to augment those observations with sensitive information purchased from the wild west of data brokers, to steer you into paying more and getting less. These schemes run the gamut from subscriptions you sign up for with a single click but can't get shut off without canceling your credit card to lengthy check-out processes that end with a long set of junk prices that tack another 10 or 20% onto the cost you thought you were about to pay.

All of this raises a deceptively simple-sounding question: what is a fair price? Owens takes us through the history of pricing, and the American tradition – begun by Quakers – of replacing haggling with price-tags, and setting those prices at "cost plus a reasonable percentage." She describes an ideological project, a cousin to the neoliberal revolution of Carter and Reagan, to replace this "fair price" with a "market price" that was calculated to be whatever the market would bear. She introduces us to the men who spent a generation dreaming of the technology to change every price for every customer, every time that customer entered the marketplace, and she shows us how, when they got their wish, they shifted billions away from workers and shoppers to owners.

Remember: a wage is also a price: it's the price you get for your labor and the precious, irreplaceable hours of your life. The same men who committed to making prices you pay as high as possible were every bit as committed to ensuring that the price you charged for those unrecoverable moments of the only life you will ever live as low as possible. Every scam to make you pay more has a mirror-image scam that ensures you are paid less. This is the logical trajectory of the gig economy – a way to bring that same exploitable information asymmetry to labor markets, where the boss can observe everyone on the payroll and how much (how little) they've accepted from job to job, but workers don't even know who the other workers are, much less what they're getting paid.

All of this is laid out with admirable clarity and detail. By the time you get to the last chapter, you'll know exactly how you're getting scammed, who is scamming you, and why they're getting away with it. The final chapter is meant to be the "What do we do about it?" chapter, and regrettably, it's weaker than other parts of the book. Owens urges you to have conversations with your friends about these things, she urges you to take basic measures to defend your privacy, and lists some businesses that have steered clear of the scams she describes in the book, with the implication that you could bring your business to these companies and ones like them.

There is nothing wrong with this advice. Every word of it is sound, and your life – and the world – will be better off if you follow it. But this wasn't what I hoped for from someone with such an excellent track record of devising shovel-ready, highly leveraged, popular policy proposals. I would much rather have been presented with a half-dozen well-thought-through, well-explained rules or laws that could really strike at the root of these problems.

The pathologies Owens presents in this book can be traced to the Chicago School, a group of radical economists who won favor with Carter, Reagan, Thatcher, and other architects of neoliberalism. The Chicago School's chief strategist was Milton Friedman, who spent decades advocating for the policies that went on to destroy the world as we knew it. Before Friedman was ascendant, his colleagues would ask him how in the world he expected his plans – totally alien to the political consensus of the day – to ever turn into action.

Friedman had a stock answer for this question: "In times of crisis, ideas move from the periphery to the center. Our job is to 'keep ideas lying around' so that when the crisis strikes, we will be able to seize the moment."

Friedman was a monster, but he was right. There's always a crisis, eventually – the world is big and complicated and subject to all kinds of shocks. Friedman didn't need a crystal ball to predict a crisis – the next crisis was eminently foreseeable. Today, crises are coming thicker and faster than ever, as Friedman's program of autocratic rule and extraction reaches a boiling point.

Each of the scams that Owens lays out in her book is a crisis in waiting. When those crises arrive, I would love to go into it knowing which policies could have prevented it, so that I can blame our policymakers for failing to prevent it, and, after they've been defenestrated, I can demand that anyone who seeks to replace them promise to take meaningful steps to end the crisis and prevent it from happening again.

Throughout this excellent book, Owens makes an indisputable case that the problems she describes have a systemic root. They're not caused by wickedness or greed – they're caused by a system designed to reward wickedness and greed. There's nothing wrong with giving people some simple measures they can take to protect themselves from such a system, but those protections will only ever be partial and temporary. I would have been far more energized if those personal measures had been a prelude to a chapter designed to equip me with a list of bold, muscular policy demands.

Long ago, Owens convinced me that the system is rigged and we all deserve better. This book made that case even clearer. I want to know how we get beyond modest personal protections and make our way to a better world for all.

---

Hey look at this (permalink)

• How to Beat Surveillance Pricing Before It Bleeds You Dry https://www.wired.com/story/how-to-beat-surveillance-pricing-before-it-bleeds-you-dry/

• By 30 points, voters oppose sending ICE agents to the polls https://www.gelliottmorris.com/p/2026-09-29-ice-and-troops-at-the-polls

• Amazon Crime https://billmckibben.substack.com/p/amazon-crime

• Trial of live facial recognition in London stations leads to a false positive and no arrests https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/29/trial-live-facial-recognition-cameras-london-stations-false-positive

• Historic England’s Vanishing Archive https://www.sarsen.org/2026/09/historic-englands-photos-didnt-vanish.html

---

Object permanence (permalink)

#25yrsago Doonesbury on 9/11 https://web.archive.org/web/20020309055239/http://www2.uclick.com/feature/01/10/01/db011001.gif

#20yrsago Suspicious Looking Device exists to incite unease https://web.archive.org/web/20061107112421/http://junkfunnel.com/sld/

#20yrsago HOWTO make elephant-shit paper https://web.archive.org/web/20061020105837/https://intensehumour.blogspot.com/2006/09/elephant-dung-paper.html

#20yrsago The Onion on TSA liquid restrictions https://web.archive.org/web/20061001102305/https://theonion.com/content/node/53536

#15yrsago Goodbye letter from Borders employee(s) (?) spills secrets of bookselling trade https://memex.craphound.com/2011/09/30/goodbye-letter-from-borders-employees-spills-secrets-of-bookselling-trade/

#10yrsago Electronic voting machines suck, the comprehensive 2016 election edition https://web.archive.org/web/20160930060538/https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-voting-technology/

#10yrsago Shadow Regulation: the secret laws that giant corporations cook up in back rooms https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/09/shadow-regulation-back-room-threat-digital-rights

#10yrsago EFF to court: don’t let US government prosecute professor over his book about securing computers https://www.eff.org/press/releases/eff-asks-court-block-us-prosecuting-security-researcher-detecting-and-publishing

#10yrsago Matt Furie on the experience of having his Pepe the Frog character hijacked by white supremacists https://riylcast.tumblr.com/post/151123916140/episode-187-matt-furie-bonus

#10yrsago Arkansas lawmaker who pushed law protecting right to video police is arrested for videoing an arrest https://web.archive.org/web/20160930151809/https://theintercept.com/2016/09/30/lawmaker-who-pushed-bill-to-protect-people-filming-police-arrested-for-filming-police/

#10yrsago Austerity kills the last steam-powered loom in the world https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-lancashire-37512136

#5yrsago Facebook thrives on criticism of "disinformation" https://pluralistic.net/2021/09/30/dont-believe-the-criti-hype/#ordinary-mediocrities

---

Upcoming appearances (permalink)

• Boston: The Post-American Internet: Possibilities for a new internet created by an American Hermit Kingdom (MIT Media Lab), Sep 30
  https://www.media.mit.edu/events/the-post-american-internet-possibilities-for-a-new-internet-created-by-an-american-hermit-kingdom/

• Boston: Rethinking Our Relationship with AI, Sep 30 (Emtech)
  https://event.technologyreview.com/emtech-future-2026/detailed-agenda

• Boston: The Paradox of Enshittification and Reverse Centaurs (Harvard Berkman Klein), Sep 30
  https://cyber.harvard.edu/events/running-harder-falling-faster-paradox-enshittification-and-reverse-centaurs

• Brighton: Digital Sovereignty and the Post-American Internet (Green Party Conference), Oct 3
  https://www.openrightsgroup.org/events/digital-sovereignty-and-the-post-american-internet/

• Virtual: How to govern technology in a multipolar digital world (Connecting Current), Oct 6
  https://connectingcurrent.tech/how-to-govern-technology-a-multipolar-digital-world/

• South Bend: An Evening With Cory Doctorow (Notre Dame), Oct 6
  https://franco.nd.edu/events/2026/10/06/an-evening-with-cory-doctorow/

• Hudson, OH: Hudson Library, Oct 7
  https://engagedpatrons.org/EventsExtended.cfm?SiteID=3850&EventID=596952&PK=

• Calgary: Wordfest, Oct 8
  https://wordfest.com/2026/show/wordfest-presents-cory-doctorow-2026/

• Winnipeg: McNally Robinson, Oct 9
  https://www.mcnallyrobinson.com/event-18991/An-Evening-with-Cory-Doctorow

• Paris: Slow Tech Summit, Oct 15
  https://slowtechsummit.com/

• Vancouver: Read, Resist, Repair, Rejoice (Vancouver Writers Festival), Oct 19
  https://writersfest.bc.ca/festival-event-2026/01

• Victoria: Munro's Books, Oct 20
  https://www.munrobooks.com/events/6113620261020

• Vancouver: Life After AI (Vancouver Writers Festival), Oct 22
  https://writersfest.bc.ca/festival-event-2026/46

• Ottawa: Life After AI (Ottawa Writers Festival), Oct 24
  https://writersfestival.org/event/life-after-ai

• Kilkenny (Kilkenomics), Nov 6-8
  https://kilkenomics.com/

• Vancouver: Enshittification (Sid Williams Theatre Society), Nov 10
  https://www.sidwilliamstheatre.com/events/cory-doctorow-talks-enshittification/

• Vancouver: BC Policy Solutions Gala, Nov 12
  https://bcpolicy.ca/gala/

• Montreal: World Science Fiction Convention, Sep 2-6
  https://montreal2027.ca/en

---

Recent appearances (permalink)

• How to Think About AI—Before It’s Too Late (Daniel Solove)
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0xR3uEgGcc

• Could Tech Bosses Destroy Life As We Know It? (Politics JOE)
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PL4VktU0SgY

• Are 'AI Apocalypse' Warnings Just Marketing? (What's Left)
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXd9HwIE5bo

• The Real AI Threat Isn’t What You’ve Been Told (The Tea with Myriam François)
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vc8It00fRsA

• Fascists may come after the AI bubble bursts (You&AI)
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2WN64aQeYQ

---

Latest books (permalink)

• "The Reverse-Centaur's Guide to AI," a short book about being a better AI critic, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, June 2026
  https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374621568/thereversecentaursguidetolifeafterai/

• "Canny Valley": A limited edition collection of the collages I create for Pluralistic, self-published, September 2025 https://pluralistic.net/2025/09/04/illustrious/#chairman-bruce

• "Enshittification: Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It," Farrar, Straus, Giroux, October 7 2025
  https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374619329/enshittification/

• "Picks and Shovels": a sequel to "Red Team Blues," about the heroic era of the PC, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), February 2025 (https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250865908/picksandshovels).

• "The Bezzle": a sequel to "Red Team Blues," about prison-tech and other grifts, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), February 2024 (thebezzle.org).

• "The Lost Cause:" a solarpunk novel of hope in the climate emergency, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), November 2023 (http://lost-cause.org).

• "The Internet Con": A nonfiction book about interoperability and Big Tech (Verso) September 2023 (http://seizethemeansofcomputation.org). Signed copies at Book Soup (https://www.booksoup.com/book/9781804291245).

• "Red Team Blues": "A grabby, compulsive thriller that will leave you knowing more about how the world works than you did before." Tor Books http://redteamblues.com.

• "Chokepoint Capitalism: How to Beat Big Tech, Tame Big Content, and Get Artists Paid, with Rebecca Giblin", on how to unrig the markets for creative labor, Beacon Press/Scribe 2022 https://chokepointcapitalism.com

---

Upcoming books (permalink)

• "The Post-American Internet," a geopolitical sequel of sorts to Enshittification, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2027

• "Unauthorized Bread": a middle-grades graphic novel adapted from my novella about refugees, toasters and DRM, FirstSecond, April 20, 2027

• "Enshittification, Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It" (the graphic novel), Firstsecond, 2027

• "The Memex Method," Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2027

---

Colophon (permalink)

Today's top sources:

Currently writing:

• “Once Is Enemy Action,” a science fiction novel about the origins of modern technofascism. Today's words: 574 (7730 total).

• "The Post-American Internet," a sequel to "Enshittification," about the better world the rest of us get to have now that Trump has torched America. Fourth draft completed. Submitted to editor.

• A Little Brother short story about DIY insulin PLANNING

---

This work – excluding any serialized fiction – is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution.

---

How to get Pluralistic:

Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

Pluralistic.net

Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://pluralistic.net/plura-list

Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic

Bluesky (no ads, possible tracking and data-collection):

https://bsky.app/profile/doctorow.pluralistic.net

Medium (no ads, paywalled):

https://doctorow.medium.com/

Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):

https://mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com/tagged/pluralistic

"When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla" -Joey "Accordion Guy" DeVilla

READ CAREFULLY: By reading this, you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies ("BOGUS AGREEMENTS") that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer.

ISSN: 3066-764X