De hybride aanvallen van Rusland in Europa worden steeds gewelddadiger. Wat wil het Kremlin hiermee bereiken?

De aanval van Hamas op 7 oktober 2023 liet diepe sporen na in Israël. Hoe kon dit plaatsvinden met Benjamin Netanyahu als premier, de man die veiligheid voor Israëliërs…

Baum Cycles posted a photo:

Baum Cycles posted a photo:

Baum Cycles posted a photo:

Baum Cycles posted a photo:

Baum Cycles posted a photo:

Thomas Hawk posted a photo:

Thomas Hawk posted a photo:

• Messi nets PK and assists twice as Argentina cruises

• Match paused in 10th minute for round of applause

Lionel Messi brought the curtain down on his 21-year international career on Tuesday, bidding farewell to adoring Argentina fans in an emotional final appearance for the former world champions in Buenos Aires.

In a perfectly scripted finale, the 39-year-old widely regarded as the greatest football player in history signed off with his 126th international goal in front of 85,000 supporters as Argentina cruised to a 3-0 victory over Benin.

Continue reading...

Ruling on Mount Pleasant coalmine shows ‘we cannot continue to dig up coal … and pretend the consequences have nothing to do with us’, group says

• Get our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcast

A Hunter Valley community group has won Australia’s first high court case to consider climate change, in a ruling advocates say sets a binding national precedent for fossil fuel projects in New South Wales.

In a landmark judgment, the nation’s highest court ruled that the approval of MACH Energy’s Mount Pleasant coalmine expansion in Musswellbrook was invalid.

Continue reading...

Microsoft has updated the lifecycle of an Azure instance, without offering any information on how long it takes for an instance type to expire. Redmond’s “enhanced lifecycle” landed in late September in a post that explains the four phases in the life of a cloudy VM: Current – VMs are recommended for new deployments, are available in many regions, and receive standard maintenance and support; Extended – Still supported, but may be subject to usage quotas and unspecified “changes to purchasing options and pricing.” Microsoft recommends planning a move to Current VMs. End of Life – VMs are still supported but are only available to existing customers and you may not be able to get more of the instances you want. Once VMs reach this stage, Microsoft wants you “actively” working to shift workloads onto Current or Extended VMs. Retired – Unsupported but not quite dead. Microsoft says VMs in this phase are no longer available and have been “deallocated” – Azure-speak for not having an IP address and being dormant, with data preserved. Customers can’t provision the instance types. Microsoft’s post explains that the company defined this lifecycle because it is “committed to helping you navigate these infrastructure transitions and take advantage of the next wave of innovation.” The post includes many mentions of “modernization” – the process of moving to Current Azure instance types. “As Azure continues to advance, our commitment is to make change predictable, transparent, and supported through clear lifecycle guidance, early visibility, and practical help to modernize with confidence,” the post states. The mention of “predictable” change led The Register to wonder if the lifecycle has a predictable cadence that means users can expect that instance types will remain in “Current” status for a certain number of years. We asked Microsoft if its Azure instance lifecycles are timed, and a spokesperson sent the following comment: “As Azure continues to innovate, we regularly evolve our infrastructure to give customers access to newer technologies and capabilities. As part of our updated Azure Virtual Machines lifecycle, we will continue to provide customers with advance notice when select older-generation VM series enter the End of Life stage. We’re giving customers time, guidance and resources to plan their transition to the current VM generations, while continuing to support Azure VMs through their lifecycle in alignment with the policies we published.” The spokesperson added that Microsoft customers are “notified directly about their specific VM retirements.” For what it’s worth, Microsoft publishes retirement announcements for Azure services. The company has also previously revealed it runs Azure servers for six years. It is unclear if the new Azure lifecycle is tied to that hardware retirement schedule. What is clear is that Microsoft wants Azure customers to regularly consider moving to its latest instance types. That’s a reasonable suggestion given that newer VMs will likely use more powerful processors. There’s also plenty of upside for Microsoft because more recent silicon typically offers more cores per die, and better performance-per-watt. Microsoft therefore gets greater processor density with lower energy consumption, which lowers its operating costs. Let’s see if Redmond’s lifecycle tweaks also see it pass on those savings. ®

Normally I reserve my vitriol for the slopbros for my personal blog, but this has become extremely DNA Lounge-related of late, as I shall explain. (This counts as plumbing-related, the internet being a series of tubes, full of toxic slop.)

As you may be aware, our web site is being constantly, relentlessly hammered by AI scrapers. I am spending an absurd number of hours just trying to keep things barely functional under this brutal onslaught. It's not only us, obviously; this toxic blight covers the entirety of the Internet. These companies are the absolute worst fucking parasites our society has yet created, and if you work for one, I am begging you, in my best Bill Hicks voice: kill yourself. "Just a thought, just trying to plant seeds."

But why do I bring this up now? Because our web-hosting bill is normally between $600 and $800 per month. Except suddenly it's now $3,500 per month, entirely because of all of these piece-of-shit AI model-training robots incompetently scraping all of our text and images, repeatedly, as fast as they possibly can; ignoring our requests to stop; and lying about who they are. And I have no solution, other than "don't have a web site any more".

(Now at least one of you is teeing up a "Well why don't you just" comment right about now. Oh you sweet summer child. I've been doing this longer than you've been alive. Hush. Just hush, you.)

Fundamentally these AI companies are now charging me to train their models for them. I am now being billed $2,700 per month, $32,000 per year, so that their spicy-autocomplete plagiarism-machines can suck the blood out of everything I've ever created and shit it back out. And no matter how many ways I try to say "I would prefer not to," they just. Will. Not. Fucking. Stop.

This cost-shifting is what these methane-breathing, hollow-eyed money-ghouls gleefully refer to as an "externality".

So, seriously, if you work for an AI company, "You are the ruiner of all things good. You are Satan's spawn, filling the world with bile and garbage, you are fucked and you are fucking us; kill yourself, it's the only way to save your soul."

And also!

If you are using this AI bullshit -- in any way -- this is what you are supporting. Every time you "just" plagiarize something "a little bit" because of some halfassed excuse you tell yourself like "but I can't do it myself, uwu smiley emoji" instead of, you know, paying an actual human artist, you are part of why DNA Lounge is being hit with this $32,000 bill. That's you. You voted for that. That's bad and you should feel bad. And more than that, you should STOP.

For example!

Not too long ago, we had this one particular event, that was very successful. It was a rental, and the promoters took in over $40,000 of ticket sales at the door, and yet they still chose to use "AI" for their flyer, and for the printed banners they hung around the venue. For them it was apparently a bridge too far to toss $200 to a local artist. Too expensive. Can't possibly afford it. Let's use the plagiarism machine instead, extruded artwork-adjacent pink slime is good enough. No one will know, nobody cares, fuck it.

I am begging you: don't be that guy.

Original Mastodon Post

After the Fire

"With the push to eliminate the twice yearly clock change, Permanent Daylight Savings Time has emerged as the favorite for most states and provinces," writes longtime Slashdot reader kbahey, sharing the findings from a recent analysis published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal. Sci.News reports: "Ending the clock change solves one problem, but it creates another decision: which time should we live on year-round?" said University of British Columbia's Professor Raymond Lam, lead author of the study. "The health evidence points to standard time, largely because morning light matters for our body clocks, sleep, and mood." Professor Lam and colleagues examined the health consequences of the two possible permanent systems rather than the broader question of whether seasonal clock changes should be abolished. They concluded that the accumulated evidence favors permanent standard time, which keeps the clock more closely aligned with human circadian biology.

This distinction, according to the team, becomes particularly important during winter. Permanent daylight saving time would push sunrise an hour later. In cities such as Toronto, for example, the latest winter sunrise would occur at 8:51 a.m., compared with 7:51 a.m. under permanent standard time. In Calgary, the corresponding times would be 9:40 a.m. and 8:40 a.m. The extra hour of morning darkness could leave people traveling to work or school before sunrise, while shifting more daylight into the evening. The change could have consequences for sleep, mood, learning and productivity, particularly among people who already have difficulty sleeping or who must follow early schedules. The reason is rooted in the body's internal clock.

"Our biological clocks need morning light to stay synchronized with the 24-hour day," said Simon Fraser University's Professor Ralph Mistlberger, co-author of the study. "Permanent daylight saving time moves that light an hour later just when winter mornings are already darkest." The analysis also highlights concerns about seasonal depression. [...] By delaying natural morning light, permanent daylight saving time would act in the opposite direction, potentially weakening an important circadian signal.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.