Vrijdagavond maakten het Rode Kruis en Vluchtelingenwerk bekend dat het in Ter Apel te onveilig is voor hun vrijwilligers om nog hulp te bieden. Over de groep die de boel „versjteert” heeft de burgemeester al acht jaar acht ministers verteld.
/s3/static.nrc.nl/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/11115137/110726VER_2035149146_-dragend.jpg)
De AI-afbeeldinggenerator Muse Image die Meta dinsdag introduceerde, is na enkele dagen alweer gestopt, dat maakte het bedrijf bekend op vrijdag.
/s3/static.nrc.nl/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/11152325/110726VER_2035150297_.jpg)
Voor de derde keer deze zomer kampt Frankrijk met een hittegolf. Rondom Parijs en in het westen van het land geldt dit weekend code rood: er worden temperaturen verwacht tot wel…
/s3/static.nrc.nl/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/11113703/110726VER_2035148995_.jpg)
Darren Schiller has added a photo to the pool:
Cnr Grenfell Street and The Parade West, Kent Town, South Australia
Darren Schiller has added a photo to the pool:
Cnr Grenfell Street and The Parade West, Kent Town, South Australia
Darren Schiller has added a photo to the pool:
Sunset bathes the rear wall of the Kent Town Hotel in fantastic orange light.
The Rise of Unitree. DJI in drones and BYD in electric cars...now Unitree in robotics? The robotics frontier in levels of autonomy. But what the hey, let's see some dancing. (Spoiler: the human is a lot better than the robots).
"Right now, the vast majority of robots in China are still hand-assembled. They're not at scale; this is still very high-mix manufacturing. One reason Unitree benefits so much from in-housing actuator production is that the designs aren't set. That early decision — not to go to contract manufacturers until you have a high-volume, settled design — matters. They have used CMs before; I believe the G1 now uses one for specific parts." --- "The actuator generates motion, but it's also the largest part of the robot's bill of materials. We've done internal BOM costing for a number of humanoids — the G1 is the one we published — and the actuators run around 50 to 70% of the BOM. Without them, your robot doesn't generate motion and doesn't function. If you source them externally, you pay all the extra costs on top: shipping, other people's margins, some value-based pricing. So a robot built in the US — where manufacturing actuators is challenging — ends up structurally more expensive than one built on the same supply chain a Unitree or many Chinese robots use. You're stuck. To compete on cost, you have to compete on the same actuator supply chain, which is extremely difficult. " --- "On overheating: look at the original G1s from a year or two ago, used in research tasks where they could carry a box of a couple kilograms for maybe five minutes at most. Then it would overheat, and you'd have to let it sit in the corner for 30 minutes — sometimes a full hour — before doing another five minutes. They've clearly iterated on this. As we showed in our paper and heard from people, you can now get around five minutes of work with ten minutes of rest, even up to ten minutes of work with ten to fifteen minutes of rest. It varies by task, but it's a vector they've clearly improved"
"Right now, the vast majority of robots in China are still hand-assembled. They're not at scale; this is still very high-mix manufacturing. One reason Unitree benefits so much from in-housing actuator production is that the designs aren't set. That early decision — not to go to contract manufacturers until you have a high-volume, settled design — matters. They have used CMs before; I believe the G1 now uses one for specific parts." --- "The actuator generates motion, but it's also the largest part of the robot's bill of materials. We've done internal BOM costing for a number of humanoids — the G1 is the one we published — and the actuators run around 50 to 70% of the BOM. Without them, your robot doesn't generate motion and doesn't function. If you source them externally, you pay all the extra costs on top: shipping, other people's margins, some value-based pricing. So a robot built in the US — where manufacturing actuators is challenging — ends up structurally more expensive than one built on the same supply chain a Unitree or many Chinese robots use. You're stuck. To compete on cost, you have to compete on the same actuator supply chain, which is extremely difficult. " --- "On overheating: look at the original G1s from a year or two ago, used in research tasks where they could carry a box of a couple kilograms for maybe five minutes at most. Then it would overheat, and you'd have to let it sit in the corner for 30 minutes — sometimes a full hour — before doing another five minutes. They've clearly iterated on this. As we showed in our paper and heard from people, you can now get around five minutes of work with ten minutes of rest, even up to ten minutes of work with ten to fifteen minutes of rest. It varies by task, but it's a vector they've clearly improved"
We kennen de taliban hier vooral als verbiedende entiteit (schaken, school voor meisjes, werken voor vrouwen, vrouwensport, vrouwen in parken, boeken geschreven door vrouwen in het curriculum, popmuziek, Valentijnsdag, te korte baarden, nieuwsmedia die beelden van levende wezens publiceren (?), voorbehoedsmiddelen, computerspelletjes, door vrouwen gerunde restaurants, niet-turquoise taxi's, buitenlandse tv-series, schoonheidssalons), maar dat beeld behoeft enige nuance. Zo maken ze ook dingen mogelijk: partnergeweld (eenzijdig) bijvoorbeeld, of een leuke parttimebaan als reisgids voor de dames. Raar verhaal in Trouw vandaag, waarvan de afdronk is dat het fantastisch is dat vrouwen onder de Taliban wel als reisgidsen kunnen werken, zij het onder strikte begeleiding van een mannelijk familielid, en alleen als het gezelschap uit vrouwen bestaat. Hartstikke fijn natuurlijk, welke vriendinnengroep staat nou niet te popelen om op safari te gaan door een samenleving die The Handmaid's Tale als leidraad neemt, en die reële kans biedt op het meepikken van een publieke steniging. Ramptoerisme, gemoderniseerd. Leuk!
Het Rode Kruis en VluchtelingenWerk naaien eruit in Ter Apel wegens vechtpartijen, intimidatie, grimmige sfeer, enzovoorts. Ter Apel ligt in Westerwolde. Westerwolde ligt in Groningen. Groningen ligt in Nederland. De NOS nam een kijkje. De sfeer in Nederland is dan zo: "Een Koerdische en een Pakistaanse man wilden wel met ons praten over de ontstane situatie, maar op het moment dat wij de camera aanzetten, ging een andere man door het lint. Hij begon te schreeuwen en tegen het bord van het COA te slaan. Je voelde de hele sfeer omslaan naar een gespannen situatie. Grote kerels deinsden terug. De beveiliging hield afstand. We zijn rustig achteruitgelopen om hem niet verder te verontrusten." Maar hey, gelukkig hield de beveiliging afstand! Want ingrijpen, dat moeten we inderdaad niet willen in Nederland.
To cater to the broadest possible market, OpenAI and Anthropic build ever-larger models capable of making a brute-force attempt to tackle almost any task. These models are the Swiss Army Knives of the AI world. When used with sufficient force, they can do almost any job … but nobody needs a frontier class model to summarize emails, draft replies, or summarize meeting notes. It's cheaper and easier to train a small domain-specific model that can run dozens of instances of on a single accelerator. Plus, building your own means you don’t have to worry about your apps rambling about goblins when OpenAI replaces an aging but still beloved model with a new one — or Uncle Sam decides your model of choice is a bit too dangerous for general consumption. Microsoft appears to be embracing the belief that bigger isn't always better, and has quietly built small army of domain-specific models. Detailed at its Build developer conference in June, Microsoft’s MAI family covers a broad range of use cases from general purpose reasoning and coding to image generation, editing, and voice models. According to a recent Bloomberg report, these models are now slowly but surely replacing OpenAI's models as the power behind the AI features in Microsoft products. When Microsoft was trying shoehorn generative AI into every facet of our digital lives, a Swiss Army Knife like GPT-5 was useful. But now the software giant knows how its customers are actually going to use AI, it can replace a frontier model with more precise tools that do the same job as quickly and cheaply as possible. Cheap is the key word here, because while AI has proven itself useful in certain areas, bean-and-token-counters aren't yet sure if it's possible to sell AI at a profit. For hyperscalers like Microsoft, that means smaller models may be necessary. Redmond describes MAI-Thinking-1 as a “medium-sized model that stands among the strongest models in its weight class” and says it "matches leading models on key software engineering benchmarks, demonstrates advanced mathematical reasoning capabilities, and is preferred to Sonnet 4.6 in our blind human side-by-side evaluations.” What Microsoft considers to be a medium model we can’t say, but when it comes to gen AI, size matters. The bigger the model, the better and more reliable it tends to be, but the more expensive it is to run. That’s because when a model uses fewer parameters, it frees up memory and improves hardware utilization. Smaller models also mean Microsoft can deploy the right AI for the right job at the right time. If Redmond sees a surge in speech-to-text traffic, the company can spin up more instances of the best model for that function while keeping costs controlled. In addition, Microsoft now designs and builds its own AI accelerators, as do Amazon and Google. Its Maia 200-series parts announced in January promise to deliver performance comparable to Nvidia's Blackwell parts. Custom chips mean operators can optimize the entire AI stack – software, hardware, and models – for greater efficiency. Microsoft isn’t the only hyperscaler thinking about smaller models. Google has been playing this game from the beginning with its Gemini and Gemma families of models built around its custom TPU architecture. However, the closest parallel to Microsoft is probably Amazon. At the dawn of the AI boom, Microsoft hitched its cart to OpenAI’s horse, while Amazon placed its bet on rival Anthropic. And just like Microsoft, Amazon has been investing heavily in its own Nova family of models and applications and coding assistants powered by them. General purpose frontier models still have their place, and someone still needs to drive innovation forward. Refining existing tools is much easier than inventing never-before-seen ones, which means OpenAI and Anthropic are still valuable to its hyperscale partners. And that's why they’re willing to invest billions to keep them afloat. The cloud titans still need the great model houses, but the less they rely on them the greater their chances of finally turning AI into a profitable business line. ®
The FCC has approved (PDF) Reflect Orbital's Earendil-1 test satellite, which will use a 60-by-60-foot mirror to reflect sunlight back to Earth after dark. "The reflected light from the satellite is supposed to span an area about 3 miles wide on the ground," reports PCMag. It comes despite objections from astronomers and environmental groups who are concerned that the satellites will unleash intrusive light pollution. From the report: The approval is only for one satellite, dubbed Earendil-1, which is meant to test Reflect Orbital's technology for shining sunlight back to Earth. The satellite will boast a steerable thin-film reflector measuring about 60 feet by 60 feet, with the goal of powering solar farms at night or illuminating disaster-struck areas after dark to help rescue teams. Reflect Orbital envisions operating over 50,000 satellites by 2035, effectively surrounding the Earth with a fleet of mirrors. The proposal has faced stiff pushback from environmental groups and astronomers who are concerned that the satellites will unleash intrusive light pollution. The opposition has been so strong that the FCC received over 1,800 public comments on the application, many of them objecting to Reflect Orbital's plan for Earendil-1.
[...] [T]he FCC approved the satellite, noting the grant is only "for a single demonstration satellite" to test an innovative technology that could advance American leadership in space. "The Communications Act states that it is the policy of the United States to 'encourage the provision of new technologies and services to the public,' and Reflect Orbital's demonstration satellite is an example of a potentially groundbreaking technology that the Commission has found is in the public interest to support," the order says. But on the most controversial aspect of the satellite, the FCC said the concerns around Reflect Orbital's solar reflector are "unrelated to the Commission's role in authorizing use of radiofrequency spectrum, and even if the Commission had authority to review and condition these operations (which it does not), these harms are unlikely to occur.
In addition, the commission said that U.S. courts have blocked the FCC from using "a generalized public interest requirement beyond its statutory authority in regulating communications. Accordingly, the operations of a solar reflector in space would not be reviewed as part of the Bureau's public interest analysis." The regulator also noted that conducting an environmental review for the satellite went beyond its authority. Even if the FCC did have the power, the commission emphasized that the grant is for a single satellite, not 50,000. "The majority of these comments focus on a hypothetical plan to deploy tens of thousands of satellites, and those who argue the single satellite will harm the human environment do not demonstrate with specificity the potential harm will be caused by the single satellite, but rather rely on the same studies as the commenters objecting to a larger constellation," the FCC adds.
[...] [T]he FCC approved the satellite, noting the grant is only "for a single demonstration satellite" to test an innovative technology that could advance American leadership in space. "The Communications Act states that it is the policy of the United States to 'encourage the provision of new technologies and services to the public,' and Reflect Orbital's demonstration satellite is an example of a potentially groundbreaking technology that the Commission has found is in the public interest to support," the order says. But on the most controversial aspect of the satellite, the FCC said the concerns around Reflect Orbital's solar reflector are "unrelated to the Commission's role in authorizing use of radiofrequency spectrum, and even if the Commission had authority to review and condition these operations (which it does not), these harms are unlikely to occur.
In addition, the commission said that U.S. courts have blocked the FCC from using "a generalized public interest requirement beyond its statutory authority in regulating communications. Accordingly, the operations of a solar reflector in space would not be reviewed as part of the Bureau's public interest analysis." The regulator also noted that conducting an environmental review for the satellite went beyond its authority. Even if the FCC did have the power, the commission emphasized that the grant is for a single satellite, not 50,000. "The majority of these comments focus on a hypothetical plan to deploy tens of thousands of satellites, and those who argue the single satellite will harm the human environment do not demonstrate with specificity the potential harm will be caused by the single satellite, but rather rely on the same studies as the commenters objecting to a larger constellation," the FCC adds.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Thomas Hawk posted a photo:
“Wij doen onze schoenen altijd in de hal uit”, klinkt het zodra jij de woonkamer binnenstapt. Je bent op bezoek bij Corine en Rob, die zich behendig tussen jou en de rest van het huis positioneren. Achter hen trekken twee Berner Sennenhonden een spoor van modder, kwijl en straatvuil over de vloer.
“Heb je soms niet gezien dat wij gewoon op sokken lopen?”, zegt Corine. “Misschien is dat voor jou niet gebruikelijk hoor, dat kan natuurlijk, maar wij vinden dat nou eenmaal een stuk hygiënischer.”
Corine en Rob kijken toe hoe jij voorover buigt, je schoenen uitdoet en netjes naast de andere schoenen zet. Eenmaal binnen aai je de honden, terwijl zij hun kleverige vachten aan jouw benen en de meubels schoonwrijven. “Sorry nog van daarnet”, zeg je.
“In bijna elke beschaving is het normaal om je schoenen uit te doen voordat je ergens naar binnen gaat", antwoordt Rob. “Het laat zien dat je respect hebt voor de mensen bij wie je te gast bent.”
&
