Popplio728 has added a photo to the pool:
Credit: Sarah Jane Jones of Wild Horse Plains, SA. Last expired on 17/03/2017.
Popplio728 has added a photo to the pool:
Credit: Sarah Jane Jones of Wild Horse Plains, SA. Last expired on 17/03/2017.
Popplio728 has added a photo to the pool:
Credit: Sarah Jane Jones of Wild Horse Plains, SA. Last expired on 17/03/2017.
Popplio728 has added a photo to the pool:
Credit: Sarah Jane Jones of Wild Horse Plains, SA. Last expired on 17/03/2017.
Popplio728 has added a photo to the pool:
Credit: Sarah Jane Jones of Wild Horse Plains, SA. Last expired on 17/03/2017.
Popplio728 has added a photo to the pool:
Credit: Sarah Jane Jones of Wild Horse Plains, SA. Last expired on 17/03/2017.
Stueyman has added a photo to the pool:
Wonnerup Beach to the left, Forrest Beach to the right, Wonnerup Inlet in the middle. Busselton, WA
Patricia Woods has added a photo to the pool:
A PwC survey of more than 4,500 CEOs found that over half report no revenue growth or cost savings from their AI investments so far, despite massive spending. Of the 4,454 business leaders surveyed, only 12% saw both lower costs and higher revenue, while 56% saw neither benefit. "26% saw reduced costs, but nearly as many experienced cost increases," adds The Register. From the report: AI adoption remains limited. Even in top use cases like demand generation (22 percent), support services (20 percent), and product development (19 percent), only a minority are deploying AI extensively. Last year, a separate PwC study found that only 14 percent of workers indicated they were using generative AI daily in their work. Despite the CEOs' repsonses, PwC concludes more investment is required. It claims that "isolated, tactical AI projects" often don't deliver measurable value, and that tangible returns instead come from enterprise-wide deployments consistent with business strategy. [...]
In terms of the broader picture, PwC says it found CEO confidence has hit a five-year low, with only 30 percent optimistic about revenue growth (down from 38 percent last year). This points to growing geopolitical risk and intensifying cyber threats, as well as uncertainty over the benefits and downsides of AI. Unsurprisingly, concern remains over tariffs as the Trump administration continues its erratic approach to policy, with almost a third of company chiefs saying tariffs are expected to reduce their company's profit margin in the year ahead. In the U.S., 22 percent indicate their corporation is highly or extremely exposed to tariffs. PwC warns that companies avoiding major investments due to geopolitical uncertainty underperform peers by two percentage points in growth and three points in profit margins.
In terms of the broader picture, PwC says it found CEO confidence has hit a five-year low, with only 30 percent optimistic about revenue growth (down from 38 percent last year). This points to growing geopolitical risk and intensifying cyber threats, as well as uncertainty over the benefits and downsides of AI. Unsurprisingly, concern remains over tariffs as the Trump administration continues its erratic approach to policy, with almost a third of company chiefs saying tariffs are expected to reduce their company's profit margin in the year ahead. In the U.S., 22 percent indicate their corporation is highly or extremely exposed to tariffs. PwC warns that companies avoiding major investments due to geopolitical uncertainty underperform peers by two percentage points in growth and three points in profit margins.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
More than half of companies haven't seen any financial benefit from their AI investments, according to PwC's latest Global CEO Survey [PDF], and yet the spending shows no signs of slowing down. Some 56% of the 4,454 chief executives surveyed across 95 countries said their companies have realized neither higher revenues nor lower costs from AI over the past year.
Only 12% reported getting both benefits -- and those rare winners tend to be the ones who built proper enterprise-wide foundations rather than chasing one-off projects. CEO confidence in near-term growth has taken a notable hit. Just 30% feel strongly optimistic about revenue growth over the next 12 months, down from 38% last year and nowhere near the 56% who felt that way in 2022.
Only 12% reported getting both benefits -- and those rare winners tend to be the ones who built proper enterprise-wide foundations rather than chasing one-off projects. CEO confidence in near-term growth has taken a notable hit. Just 30% feel strongly optimistic about revenue growth over the next 12 months, down from 38% last year and nowhere near the 56% who felt that way in 2022.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch: Meta's Oversight Board is tackling a case focused on Meta's ability to permanently disable user accounts. Permanent bans are a drastic action, locking people out of their profiles, memories, friend connections, and, in the case of creators and businesses, their ability to market and communicate with fans and customers. This is the first time in the organization's five-year history as an oversight body that permanent account bans have been a subject of the Oversight Board's focus, the organization notes.
The case being reviewed isn't exactly one of an everyday user. Instead, the case involves a high-profile Instagram user who repeatedly violated Meta's Community Standards by posting visual threats of violence against a female journalist, anti-gay slurs against politicians, content depicting a sex act, allegations of misconduct against minorities, and more. The account had not accumulated enough strikes to be automatically disabled, but Meta made the decision to permanently ban the account. The Board's materials didn't name the account in question, but its recommendations could impact others who post content that targets public figures with abuse, harassment, and threats, as well as users who have their accounts permanently banned without receiving transparent explanations.
Meta referred this specific case to the Board, which included five posts made in the year before the account was permanently disabled. The Board says it's looking for input about several key issues: how permanent bans can be processed fairly, the effectiveness of its current tools to protect public figures and journalists from repeated abuse and threats of violence, the challenges of identifying off-platform content, whether punitive measures effectively shape online behaviors, and best practices for transparent reporting on account enforcement decisions. [...] Whether the Oversight Board has any real sway to address issues on Meta's platform continues to be debated, of course. [...] After the Oversight Board issues its policy recommendations to Meta, the company has 60 days to respond. The Board is also soliciting public comments on this topic. The report notes that Meta's Oversight Board is able to overturn individual moderation decisions and offer recommendations, but largely sidelined from major policy shifts driven by Mark Zuckerberg.
The case being reviewed isn't exactly one of an everyday user. Instead, the case involves a high-profile Instagram user who repeatedly violated Meta's Community Standards by posting visual threats of violence against a female journalist, anti-gay slurs against politicians, content depicting a sex act, allegations of misconduct against minorities, and more. The account had not accumulated enough strikes to be automatically disabled, but Meta made the decision to permanently ban the account. The Board's materials didn't name the account in question, but its recommendations could impact others who post content that targets public figures with abuse, harassment, and threats, as well as users who have their accounts permanently banned without receiving transparent explanations.
Meta referred this specific case to the Board, which included five posts made in the year before the account was permanently disabled. The Board says it's looking for input about several key issues: how permanent bans can be processed fairly, the effectiveness of its current tools to protect public figures and journalists from repeated abuse and threats of violence, the challenges of identifying off-platform content, whether punitive measures effectively shape online behaviors, and best practices for transparent reporting on account enforcement decisions. [...] Whether the Oversight Board has any real sway to address issues on Meta's platform continues to be debated, of course. [...] After the Oversight Board issues its policy recommendations to Meta, the company has 60 days to respond. The Board is also soliciting public comments on this topic. The report notes that Meta's Oversight Board is able to overturn individual moderation decisions and offer recommendations, but largely sidelined from major policy shifts driven by Mark Zuckerberg.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Weer voor Rotterdam ☁️
Huidige temperatuur (om 01:15): 4.5°C (Bewolkt)Windsnelheid: 14.8 km/u (4.1 m/s), richting: ↖ 142°
Luchtkwaliteit:
- AQI: 87 🟡 (Matig)
- PM2.5: 24.5 μg/m³
- PM10: 31.1 μg/m³
Voorspelling voor de komende dagen:
- woensdag 21 januari: Min 3.7°, Max 6.9° (Matige motregen) 🌦️, Neerslag 1.8, Kans op neerslag 24%, Windsnelheid: 22.0 km/u (6.1 m/s), richting: ↖ 137°
- donderdag 22 januari: Min 2.0°, Max 7.2° (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 1%, Windsnelheid: 19.1 km/u (5.3 m/s), richting: ← 109°
- vrijdag 23 januari: Min 2.6°, Max 6.7° (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 2%, Windsnelheid: 14.8 km/u (4.1 m/s), richting: ← 100°
- zaterdag 24 januari: Min -1.0°, Max 2.2° (Lichte sneeuw) ❄️, Neerslag 1.5, Kans op neerslag 12%, Windsnelheid: 11.6 km/u (3.2 m/s), richting: ← 77°
- zondag 25 januari: Min -2.4°, Max 0.7° (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 3%, Windsnelheid: 11.0 km/u (3.1 m/s), richting: ↙ 52°
- maandag 26 januari: Min -2.3°, Max 0.9° (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 2%, Windsnelheid: 13.6 km/u (3.8 m/s), richting: ↙ 41°
- dinsdag 27 januari: Min -3.7°, Max -0.1° (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 3%, Windsnelheid: 13.6 km/u (3.8 m/s), richting: ← 78°
Uurlijkse voorspelling voor de komende 12 uur:
- 02:00: 4.5° (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 12%, Windsnelheid: 16.6 km/u (4.6 m/s), richting: ↖ 131°
- 03:00: 4.4° (Lichte motregen) 🌦️, Neerslag 0.1, Kans op neerslag 17%, Windsnelheid: 20.2 km/u (5.6 m/s), richting: ↖ 130°
- 04:00: 5.1° (Lichte motregen) 🌦️, Neerslag 0.1, Kans op neerslag 25%, Windsnelheid: 22.0 km/u (6.1 m/s), richting: ↖ 141°
- 05:00: 5.2° (Lichte motregen) 🌦️, Neerslag 0.1, Kans op neerslag 42%, Windsnelheid: 22.0 km/u (6.1 m/s), richting: ↖ 154°
- 06:00: 5.1° (Lichte motregen) 🌦️, Neerslag 0.1, Kans op neerslag 62%, Windsnelheid: 20.9 km/u (5.8 m/s), richting: ↖ 153°
- 07:00: 5.3° (Lichte motregen) 🌦️, Neerslag 0.1, Kans op neerslag 75%, Windsnelheid: 20.5 km/u (5.7 m/s), richting: ↖ 153°
- 08:00: 5.3° (Lichte motregen) 🌦️, Neerslag 0.3, Kans op neerslag 76%, Windsnelheid: 18.7 km/u (5.2 m/s), richting: ↖ 148°
- 09:00: 5.3° (Matige motregen) 🌦️, Neerslag 0.5, Kans op neerslag 70%, Windsnelheid: 19.4 km/u (5.4 m/s), richting: ↖ 143°
- 10:00: 5.5° (Lichte motregen) 🌦️, Neerslag 0.1, Kans op neerslag 61%, Windsnelheid: 20.2 km/u (5.6 m/s), richting: ↖ 153°
- 11:00: 5.9° (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 48%, Windsnelheid: 20.5 km/u (5.7 m/s), richting: ↖ 153°
- 12:00: 6.2° (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 31%, Windsnelheid: 19.4 km/u (5.4 m/s), richting: ↖ 154°
- 13:00: 6.7° (Bewolkt) ☁️, Kans op neerslag 18%, Windsnelheid: 19.4 km/u (5.4 m/s), richting: ↖ 154°
#Rotterdam #Meteo #MeteoBot #MeteoNetherlands #OpenMeteo #FediMeteo
Familieappgroep. Vol trots stuurt iedereen zijn foto’s van het noorderlicht. Van Leeuwarden tot Amsterdam en Het Gooi.
:format(jpeg):fill(f8f8f8,true)/s3/static.nrc.nl/bvhw/wp-content/blogs.dir/114/files/2019/07/ikje5bij3-1.png)
Een forensentrein botste dinsdagavond ten noordwesten van Barcelona op een omgevallen muur. Daarbij kwam de machinist om het leven en raakten volgens de lokale brandweer 37 mensen gewond.
/s3/static.nrc.nl/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/21003052/ANP-548114900.jpg)
Jonathan Wheatley has opened up on the “extraordinary feeling” of the Audi F1 team becoming a reality, as he also revealed the new generation of power units “sound good” ahead of Formula 1’s new era of regulations.
For Kiana Calloway, the brick wall became a green screen for theatrical performances and football games. For Sunny Jacobs, meditation brought her to a lush patch of grass and her children’s rooms at bedtime. And for Frank De Palma, 22 years without a mirror meant he didn’t recognize the man who finally emerged from the 6 x 9 foot cell.
All three narrate the devastating “Inside, The Valley Sings,” directed by Nathan Fagan with animation by Natasza Cetner. The rotoscoped short film recounts the experiences of the trio, who were collectively isolated in solitary confinement for 36 years. Each shares how they coped with the inhumane conditions that barred any connection with another person. Dissociation and psychological torment reigned, providing relief and torment within such a cruel environment.
Solitary confinement is the practice of detaining a person in a cell for nearly or all of 24 hours. This type of segregation cuts off contact with others and sometimes lasts for days, weeks, or, as we see in the film, decades. The U.S. imprisons more of its population than nearly every other country and is the only Western nation to allow the practice, which the U.N. recognizes as torture and has sought to outlaw. A 2023 report estimated that 122,000 children and adults are held in solitary confinement in U.S. facilities each day.
The traumatic effects of segregation can also last well beyond prison. “Even today, I wake up with cold sweats, having nightmares of screams, howling from the cells next to me. Or hearing a guy that’s mentally ill four cells down from me that’s beating and screaming and hollering for a security officer to come down there and give him some type of medical treatment, only to get beaten,” Calloway says.
What “Inside, The Valley Sings” does particularly well is mimic the conditions of the cell. We witness tightly cropped frames and claustrophobic aerial views. And because each person is presented in grayscale, they become part of the carceral architecture, with only their orange uniforms—signifiers of their inmate status—and fantasies in bright color.
“My hope is that audiences will understand what survivors have been telling us for years: that solitary confinement is a form of torture, pure and simple,” Fagan writes in a statement about the film. “And any justice system that claims to be grounded in the dignity and rights of the individual must recognise this.” It’s worth reading the stories of all three narrators on the film’s website, which also offers more information about the campaign to end solitary confinement.
Do stories and artists like this matter to you? Become a Colossal Member today and support independent arts publishing for as little as $7 per month. The article A Rotoscoped Film Underscores How Fantasy Is the Only Reprieve in Solitary Confinement appeared first on Colossal.