The Guardian

Latest news, sport, business, comment, analysis and reviews from the Guardian, the world's leading liberal voice

Reform and Restore are both hard right and poisonous – but their differences could be their undoing | Andy Beckett

It is not enough to revile them both. Understanding the personal and ideological divergence is essential to taking back the ground they now occupy

For all their claims to be mould-breaking politicians, the feuding Nigel Farage and Rupert Lowe are in many ways predictable and traditional rightwingers. Two wealthy white men in their 60s from southern England, with private educations and previous careers in the City, they were once members of the Conservative party – before, like many in their demographic, they decided it was not anti-EU enough. Out of this mix of dissatisfaction and privilege emerged the nationalistic, socially conservative politics that has dominated much of the past decade, shaping British discourse and influencing Labour and the Tories, despite the ever clearer failure of its flagship policy, Brexit.

Some of the intensity of the civil war on the right, which has erupted since Lowe left Reform UK in disputed circumstances last year and then set up his own populist party, Restore Britain, in February, is down to the smallness of the differences between the two leaders and their parties. Farage and Lowe are both aggressive, digitally enabled communicators who sometimes dress like old-fashioned country squires – signalling that they want to both disrupt and preserve – and draw from the same pool of activists, strategists and policy ideas.

Continue reading...

Panama World Cup 2026 team guide

After impressive showings in recent major tournaments, Thomas Christiansen’s players are aiming to prove a point on the global stage

This article is part of the Guardian’s 2026 World Cup Experts’ Network, a cooperation between some of the best media organisations from the 48 countries who qualified. theguardian.com is running previews from three countries each day in the run-up to the tournament kicking off on 11 June.

Continue reading...

You be the judge: should my girlfriend make better use of our shared calendar?

Jordan wants one catch-all digital resource for him and Charlene, so their social lives don’t clash, but she prefers to communicate in person. You decide whose time is up

• Find out how to get a disagreement settled or become a juror

I’m not trying to control her but having one shared calendar helps us plan our lives together

Continue reading...

The Register

Biting the hand that feeds IT — Enterprise Technology News and Analysis

Every employee’s password was stored in a single Excel file

PWNED Welcome, once again, to PWNED, the weekly screed where we highlight those who did not do the deed of securing their systems. If someone left their passwords or their access exposed, we will be writing about them here. Have a story about someone leaving a gaping hole in their network? Share it with us at pwned@sitpub.com. Anonymity is available upon request. This week’s terrifying tale of poor security hygiene comes courtesy of Luke Irwin, CEO and principal consultant at Aegis Cybersecurity. He’s been in the industry for more than a quarter of a century and he knows where the bits are buried. At one point, Irwin consulted for a company that was a large national facility services organization, a 2,000-employee firm that provided cleaning, security guards, industrial abseiling (cleaning the facade), and other things that other large businesses need to keep their physical plants running smoothly. The CEO had one very peculiar idea about how to keep his own house in order: he wanted to have access to every one of his employees’ login credentials. The chief executive had an Excel spreadsheet sitting right on his desktop with a complete list of all the employee usernames and passwords. Let that sink in for a second. One person had all the keys to the castle in a single, easily accessible file. In any decent security setup, no one in the company has access to anyone else’s password. Even the head of the IT department should not know another employee’s password. I say this as someone who used to work for a company where the IT department would ask you to DM them your password if you had computer problems. But this company’s CEO wanted the usernames and passwords for reasons I’m sure any of his employees would appreciate: so he could go into their email accounts! He had an experience where one colleague had sent secret information to the entire company via email and he had spent the evening logging into every single account and deleting the message before anyone could see it. Just in case other messages were sent in error in the future, the CEO wanted the ability to log into all the relevant accounts and delete them himself. Perhaps for the same reason, he would not allow MFA (multi-factor authentication), because that would have kept him out of people’s inboxes. He was adamant even though the company had been the victim of a ransomware incident previously. “Despite repeated advice, he held that position for around four months, until we were able to demonstrate that the IT team could remove messages centrally using fairly simple administrative commands, without needing everyone’s password,” Irwin said. Even after getting rid of the Excel sheet of shame, the boss still refused to turn on MFA and the company subsequently suffered two data breaches involving sensitive client data. Unfortunately, this company wasn’t the only one that Irwin worked with where the management had something against MFA. Another client, this one in the medical sector, was opposed to multi-factor authentication because it “made things just a little too hard” for the external consultants they were using to access their systems. During the time that Irwin worked with that company, they got lucky and no one breached them. But since then, he’s seen signs that their data was available on the dark web. No word on whether they ever switched MFA on. There’s plenty to learn from Irwin’s two clients, but it’s all pretty obvious. First, don’t let anyone, even administrators or CEOs, have other people’s passwords. If someone has to get into another person’s email account, have IT use administrative access. Second, always enable MFA, preferably MFA with passkeys. ®

Found Slide

Thomas Hawk posted a photo:

Found Slide

New Melody

Thomas Hawk posted a photo:

New Melody

Paradise beach Zamami Island

Mike Lyvers has added a photo to the pool:

Paradise beach Zamami Island

Bridge over azure waters, Zamami

Mike Lyvers has added a photo to the pool:

Bridge over azure waters, Zamami

Ferries at Vivid

Rambo2100 has added a photo to the pool:

Ferries at Vivid

The Queenscliff and Clontarf ferries at berth during Sydney's Vivid.

Wel.nl

Minder lezen, Meer weten.

Canada komt met strengere regels voor sociale media voor kinderen

OTTAWA (ANP/RTR/BLOOMBERG) - Canada verbiedt sociale media voor kinderen onder de 16 jaar als de platforms niet voldoen aan nieuwe veiligheidsstandaarden. Zo moeten onder meer Facebook, Instagram en X meer gaan doen om schadelijke content tegen te gaan en vermelden wanneer beelden kunstmatig gegenereerd zijn.

Canada is het volgende in een reeks landen dat de regels voor sociale media voor kinderen aanscherpt. Eerder kwamen bijvoorbeeld Australië en Griekenland met een algeheel verbod. Canada was dat eerst ook van plan, maar de regering is er toch van overtuigd dat de apps veilig kunnen worden gebruikt als er voldoende regels zijn.

Een nieuwe digitale toezichthouder gaat de veiligheidsstandaarden uitwerken en toezien op de naleving. Pas dan kunnen sociale media een uitzondering krijgen op het verbod voor kinderen. Het kan anderhalf jaar duren voordat de toezichthouder in werking is, waardoor in de tussentijd een algeheel verbod dreigt voor gebruikers onder de 16 jaar.