OPINION Capita's share price tanked 9 percent last week after it told investors it was taking a hit on its contract with the UK government's Civil Service Pension Scheme (CSPS), which has left some of its 1.7 million members unpaid following a disastrous launch. A trading update said operating profit would be down between £25 million and £40 million in 2026 as a result. Sage voices were soon on hand to calm fears, though. "The scale of the reaction sits oddly with the contract's modest financial weight," said Ian Lyall of Proactive Investors. The hit to revenue was "a sliver of Capita's roughly £2 billion turnover." For the first four months of the year, Capita reported £750 million of total contract value won, up 20 percent on a year earlier. "For now, there is no sign that reputational damage is denting that momentum," Lyall added. The assessment that Capita's CSPS troubles may barely dent its long-term prospects will be of little comfort to scheme members left struggling to make ends meet. But they do suggest the wider problem. In the House of Commons last week, Minister for the Cabinet Office Nick Thomas-Symonds said the Capita CSPS contract "could be a prime candidate for insourcing in the future." However, he also admitted that option would have to wait. "If I were to terminate the contract straightaway, that would clearly cause severe disruption to the payroll. I cannot replace a complex pension operation overnight," Thomas-Symonds said. So, for now, the government is stuck with Capita, and its performance will be of concern on other contracts. It has a deal to work on CSPS cases to provide the so-called McCloud remedy removing age discrimination from public service pensions. That work is expected to be completed by March next year, through a separate contract at an additional cost of £45 million. Then there is the promise to take over running finance and HR services for the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), Ministry of Justice (MoJ), Home Office, and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). Its £370 million contract win is being challenged in court by rival bidder Sopra Steria, which alleges the winning bid was "abnormally low" and based on staffing "significantly below the current levels." At the time, Capita told The Register it had taken part in a robust procurement process and stood ready to work with the DWP to ensure value for money. A DWP spokesperson said its priority was continuity of service and value for money for the public. Nonetheless, concerns about staffing levels echo the CSPS contract. In October last year, a report from Parliament's spending watchdog said Capita planned to employ 332 staff on the scheme, 33 less than the previous provider, MyCSP. The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) report said estimated resourcing levels assumed that "more automation and increased functionality of its IT system will require fewer staff." Speaking to the PAC last week, Government Chief Commercial Officer Andrew Forzani said Capita made a series of commitments about its ability to deploy technology and automate the service as part of the selection process. Chris Clements, managing director of Capita Pension Solutions, said that Capita employed additional staff in a "surge" before go-live "because we identified that some of the technology was not going to be there on time." Group CEO Adolfo Hernandez also told the meeting it hired more people because it didn't appreciate the backlog from the previous provider. Whether the DWP's shared service cluster will encounter similar problems is yet unanswered. However, Sopra Steria's case alleges the Capita bid was 40 percent under the DWP's own cost modeling. To understand why the government continues to choose Capita, you have to understand its options. Forzani explained to the PAC last week that "a very lengthy procurement process" for CSPS started with six providers but there were "only two credible final bids, which were Capita and MyCSP." Civil Service Chief Operating Officer and Cabinet Office Permanent Secretary Cat Little also told the PAC the public sector is one of the last parts of the economy to offer defined benefit pension schemes. "We are a very large customer for complex schemes in a market that has a very small number of suppliers," she said, adding that the government's ability to "shape the market" for suppliers was limited by the high risk and complex nature of the scheme. "We are in a very classic make-or-buy decision making process." That kind of decision will come into focus from April next year, when a government policy announced in June kicks in. All contracts over £1 million in value must be assessed for in-house viability before renewal, and central government departments exceeding £100 million in annual spend must develop five-year insourcing strategies. "This framework builds the exact long-term capability that we need, shifting our focus from short-term pricing to service quality and operational resilience," Thomas-Symonds promised the House of Commons last week. While the new policy might seem like a good option given Capita's recent performance on the CSPS, insourcing raises more questions than it answers. Does the government have the management skills to bring contracts in-house, design the services, and build the technology? Can it recruit those skills? Are Civil Service skills, pay, and recruitment systems set up to support such an ambition? The government has promised "a competitive pay framework, high-impact work and clear pathways for new and existing talent" in tech leadership as part of its Roadmap for Modern Digital Government. A report from Parliament's Science, Innovation and Technology committee said earlier this year that the government's aim to ensure that those in leadership roles have the necessary digital expertise "will require reforms to recruitment and retention mechanisms, including pay, as well as a broader process of cultural transformation." Even before its new insourcing rules, the government was struggling to find the technical professionals and leaders it needed. Back in 2023, the PAC reported on barriers to achieving greater efficiency through digital transformation. Dame Meg Hillier MP, chair at the time, said digital ambitions were "hobbled by staff shortages, and a lack of support, accountability and focus from the top." Recruiting the requisite workforce for significant insourcing will take time. The next general election is due by 2029. Until the government builds that capability, inertia may remain stronger than its insourcing ambitions, leaving departments dependent on the same small pool of suppliers. ®

Whitehall has spent time and taxpayer money confirming that teenagers who spend less time on social media tend to be happier, better rested, and more willing to interact with the people sitting in the same house. Ministers say the government-backed trial strengthens the case for their planned ban on social media access for under-16s after providing real-world evidence that cutting back on apps does exactly what parents have been saying for years. The study followed more than 300 families across the UK as they tried one of three restrictions at home: removing social media apps entirely, blocking access between 9 pm. and 7 am, or limiting each app to 15 minutes a day. Across the trial, teenagers reported going to bed earlier, sleeping better, feeling calmer, and concentrating more effectively at school. Parents also described quieter evenings and more time spent talking together instead of staring at separate screens. The strongest effects came when social media apps disappeared altogether. Those families reported the biggest increases in face-to-face time with friends and evenings spent together, alongside less screen time and better focus. Families trying the overnight curfew also saw benefits, particularly around sleep, with some parents saying the 9 pm cutoff became routine within a couple of weeks. The 15-minute limit, by contrast, flopped. Teenagers found it too restrictive to use apps in any meaningful way, leading many to ration their allotted minutes, switch to other devices, or simply migrate to platforms that weren't subject to the same restrictions. Secretary of State Liz Kendall said the findings reflected what many parents already believed: "These findings show what parents have been telling us all along: when children spend less time on social media, the benefits are real.” "It's why we're taking the strongest action in the world to support a generation that is healthier, happier and more connected to the people and experiences that matter most - not just to their screens,” she added. The announcement also attempts to head off one of the biggest criticisms of the government's forthcoming age restrictions: that teenagers will simply install a VPN and carry on regardless. New figures released alongside the study suggest that while roughly a quarter of children aged 11 to 17 have used a VPN, only between 7 percent and 10 percent say they do so specifically to bypass age checks. Instead, the government says the far more common workaround is simply entering a fake date of birth, a trick it argues will become less effective once platforms are required to use stronger age-verification systems. None of this proves the government's under-16 social media ban will be painless to enforce, or universally popular. But if ministers were looking for evidence that fewer hours of doomscrolling might leave teenagers a little better rested and families a little less distracted, they now have a government-funded study telling them exactly that. ®

Original Mastodon Post

Nouky

Thomas Hawk posted a photo:

Thomas Hawk posted a photo:

De eerste vrouwelijke maanreiziger Christina Koch bezocht met haar mede-crewleden het ruimtevaartcentrum Estec in Noordwijk, als dank voor de Europese bijdrage aan de geslaagde Artemis II-missie in april van dit jaar.

De remake van ‘Little House on the Prairie’ probeert de koloniale geur van de oorspronkelijke tv-serie en boekenreeks te verdrijven. De nieuwe serie is bij vlagen spannend, maar ook tenenkrommend.

Ukraine has struck most of Russia’s oil refineries in recent months, leading to acute fuel shortages in some parts of the country.

​Een Amsterdams bedrijf is een intern onderzoek gestart nadat een groep collega's tijdens de lunchwandeling onverwachts in het jaar 1652 bleek te zijn beland. Hoe het precies heeft kunnen gebeuren, is nog onduidelijk. "Ik had eerst niets door", vertelt collega Janneke. "Maar toen we op de Dam aankwamen, zag ik ineens een gebouw dat ik niet herkende en viel het mij opeens op dat niemand merkkleding droeg. Er liep ook een gast voorbij met een zwarte hoed en een pofbroek. Toen viel het kwartje."

Voor collega Boris waren vooral de paard en wagen doorslaggevend. "Een bro op een paard riep naar me dat ik 'aan den kant moescht'. Dat is toch anders dan iemand op een fatbike die je een middelvinger geeft."

Bij ENTR VR museum kijk je niet naar een verhaal, je stapt er samen in. Beleef geschiedenis en cultuur van binnenuit in virtual reality.

&