It's about time: the General Conference on Weights and Measures looks set to end leap seconds in an effort to reach horological harmony. Since 1972, 27 leap seconds have been added to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) to keep it in step with the astronomical time scale UT1, which is based on Earth's fluctuating rotation. The proposal would increase the permitted difference between UTC and UT1 from 0.9 seconds to one hour, avoiding leap-second adjustments for centuries. Earth's rotation has also sped up in recent years, raising the possibility of a negative leap second – removing a second rather than adding one. That has never been done before. Experts have estimated a 30 percent probability that global systems will need a negative leap second by 2035 to keep the two time measures in step. That could pose problems for computer systems designed to handle added seconds but not removed ones. Many national bodies support the proposal, which is expected to pass. If approved, the change would take effect on May 20, 2027. Setnam Shemar, principal scientist at the UK's National Physical Laboratory, said the proposal would avoid the risks associated with leap seconds for centuries. "Leap seconds can be difficult to implement reliably, and if not applied correctly, they can cause differences in time across networks, potentially leading to the failure of systems such as mobile phone networks or electricity grids. These risks could increase if a negative leap second had to be implemented for the first time. "Previously, leap seconds were added to UTC to keep it within 0.9 seconds of UT1. From 20 May 2027, a difference of up to 1 hour will be allowed before intervention is needed, ensuring the continuity of UTC for several centuries or more. "The relationship between UTC and UT1 is important for some applications, such as astronomy and celestial navigation. The decision would not sever that link: UT1 will continue to be monitored, and its difference from UTC will continue to be disseminated through established international services." ®
Silicon Valley’s AI bros have supposedly found a new way to signal to those around them how committed they are to their industry: Take up smoking despite the risk of cancer, because they expect bots to develop a cure … any day now. At least, that’s the claim Palantir CTO Shyam Sankar made in a recent interview on CBS's Face the Nation. In trying to explain what he described as a doomsday cult surrounding effective altruism, whose adherents include some AI researchers who believe the technology could bring about a utopia, Sankar claimed smoking has become a way for researchers to demonstrate their faith in the tech. “So many AI researchers have started smoking as a way of signaling to other researchers how much they believe in AI,” Sankar said to the confusion of host Margaret Brennan. Those researchers “believe so much in AI that it's going to cure cancer, I'm showing you my chips are all in,” Sankar explained. Sankar described the decision to take up smoking as a bet that AI would cure any health ailments that arose from it as “mass psychosis” and “social delusion” that’s getting in the way of actual discussions around the state of AI, and he blamed Silicon Valley’s pet philosophy, effective altruism, for those delusions. “There's an unseen force driving the narrative around AI safety, and it's really this millenarian doomsday cult meets messianic complex called effective altruism,” Sankar said. That philosophy prioritizes making the most effective decisions that benefit the most humans - like utilitarianism on steroids - and it tends to take a long-term approach to things. That’s where AI comes in: Effective altruists are ostensibly focused on ensuring AI systems are built in a way that will best benefit humanity. That focus has been a key reason why so much AI doomerism has come out of Silicon Valley too: If we’re going to build safe AI, says the effective altruist, we have to make sure that we consider all the risks. “There's only really roughly 2,000 AI researchers in America, and the vast majority of them believe in this sort of worldview around effective altruism,” Sankar noted. The Palantir CTO seems to believe, like many effective altruism critics, that all the doomsday scenarios and far-fetched risks being posited by the EA AI crowd are less technical critiques and more like theological ones. “I think there's a profound truth to Pascal's saying that every human has a god-shaped hole in their heart,” Sankar said, “and it's important to understand that many of these folks in Silicon Valley who are building this technology have filled that hole with the machine God of AGI.” Smoking as a bet that the machine god will save them from cancer, therefore, is akin to the ascetic’s endurance of physical pain or trauma in the hopes God will heal them or see them safely through their torment. From a more practical perspective, this isn’t exactly a great idea, as one former cancer researcher who spoke to The Register told us. “Good luck to them with this approach,” the researcher, who declined to be named, opined. “Even more so, good luck to their non-smoking friends and family taking in their passive smoke.” Taking up smoking in the hopes of a cure may not be a wise idea when one considers the timeline needed to develop a cancer drug, much less a cancer cure. "Even with AI, developing and introducing a new cancer drug into any of the world's health systems can take several years,” the researcher explained. “Even then we wouldn't know whether or not resistance to the drug would develop in the tumors.” The ability of AI to discover drugs and medical treatments has been much hyped - Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis even predicted last year that 2025 would be the year humans started popping AI-designed pills. That hasn’t happened yet, and there’s no real indication it will anytime soon. In other words, the likelihood that AI is going to kill us all is ridiculously overblown. The actual casualties, it seems, are more likely to be the AI bros giving themselves cancer as a show of faith in their machine god. ®
De gemeente Amsterdam en een paardenkoetshouder stonden woensdag tegenover elkaar bij de Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State in Den Haag. De paardenkoetshouder hoopt zijn bedrijf voort te kunnen zetten, maar de gemeente wil af van alternatief vervoer voor toeristen in de binnenstad.
Phillips sought to buck up his fellow London bureau colleagues during a contentious staff meeting on Tuesday
The veteran British broadcaster Sir Trevor Phillips had some strong words of advice for his CBS News colleagues when facing off against critics who question the editorial integrity of the network: “Why don’t you just fuck off and let us do our jobs?”
Phillips made his blunt suggestion during a contentious meeting of the network’s London bureau on Tuesday, during which the foreign editor, Shayndi Raice, went on a lengthy tirade criticizing unnamed staffers for suggesting that editorial oversight amounted to “interference” and informing colleagues that disobeying editors would be insubordination and “legal grounds for firing”.
International grouping of China-sceptic legislators warns of risks inherent in misjudging bilateral relationship
The UK’s approach to China is “beset by incoherence” and plagued by a lack of senior expertise, according to a report warning of the risks inherent in misjudging the bilateral relationship.
Wednesday’s audit by the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (Ipac), an international grouping of China-sceptic legislators, says past engagement with Beijing has often exposed the UK to the risks of interference without delivering the opportunities promised.
Let’s briefly deconstruct a viral or soon to be viral story out of Cologne, Germany regarding an incident in which a “remotely controlled robot grabs 16-year-old's buttocks” and “performed thrusting movements against her,” according to police.
I have begun to see this story percolate around the English-speaking internet because it is absurd and not good, and has already been aggregated to hell by social media meme pages with essentially zero information other than this absurd police image:
The Cologne Police did not exactly help matters by issuing a short press release that treats the robot as mysterious, the circumstances as mysterious, and the evidence as “unusual.” The Cologne Police’s Facebook post featuring a photo of the mustachioed robot reads “A red-gold robot triggered a police operation on the Cologne Ring on Sunday night (October 11). The device is said to have touched a 16-year-old girl's buttocks and performed thrusting movements against her […] The police are now investigating how the robot worked at the time of the assault and whether someone was deliberately controlling its movements. Emergency services seized the robot and two mobile phones from the suspect. The police are investigating on suspicion of defamation on a sexual basis.”
Coverage by even well-resourced outlets like CNN, CBC, and the BBC have almost no information beyond the police press release, which is lazy and stupid, because it is possible to figure out everything that happened here with three seconds of clicking around the internet. The Associated Press wrote that the entire phenomenon is "new territory" for the police, which, I'm sorry to say, men using tech to harass women on livestreams in 2026 is not "unusual" or "new territory" and hasn't been for many years.
The English coverage of the incident looks like this:
In fact, with a small amount of Googling and/or clicking around social media, it is easy to find out everything you would ever need to know about the robot and what happened here.
The tl;dr is that a 16-year-old German Twitch IRL livestreamer named Agaamuza has been streaming himself using an off-the-shelf $5,000 robot from a company named Unitree to walk around Cologne and bother people outside of bars in the way that extremely annoying Twitch livestreamers and TikTok stars have been doing for years. In a recent livestream, Agaamuza or one of his friends uses the robot to grab a girl’s ass, the boys laugh about it, and the police get involved. Twitch has temporarily suspended his channel from streaming but because of the social media clipping economy, there are zillions of videos of the streamers and the robot percolating across Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok.
On the actual internet where real people click around and don't regurgitate police statements and pretend they're reporting the news, you can see the entire arc of what happened, which now includes an hour-long "statement" Twitch video in which Agaamuza streams with the robot dressed in striped prison clothes.
The slightly longer version: For at least a few weeks, Agaamuza and his friends put a mustache and giant chain necklace on the robot, call him “Ahmad the Robot,” and film people’s reactions to the robot thrusting, dancing, punching the sky, walking into stores, etc. Most of these videos are annoying but not illegal. They are very much a part of YouTube / Twitch “prank” culture, in which men—almost always men—film themselves hitting on women, interviewing people outside of bars, and doing stupid shit in public. Agaamuza and “Ahmad the Robot” have become minor characters in the German Twitch streaming world over the last few weeks.
The robot in question is the Unitree R1, which costs between $4,900 and $5,900 depending on the specific model. Unitree is a Chinese robot company that makes the R1 and a robot dog that has become vaguely popular among people who are excited about humanoid robots and gadget YouTubers. Unitree is kind of a Boston Dynamics-esque company in that it makes lots of YouTube videos of its robots doing cartwheels and backflips and fighting other robots, and regularly goes viral for it. The capabilities of the R1 robot are not a secret and can be found in any number of YouTube videos or on Unitree’s website (which is to say that the R1 is not a mysterious harassment or spy robot as it has been portrayed in some of the aggregations of this story I’ve seen).
The robot, but not the incident in question
Anyways, over the weekend while live-streaming, Agaamuza or one of his friends has the robot walk into a group of girls standing on the street in Cologne. “Oh my god oh my god Ahmad,” one of the streamers says, as they walk the robot directly into a girl’s ass. One of the girls says “Oh my god stop.” The boys say “Hey, he wants to meet you, do you want to meet him?” The girls say no. The robot begins thrusting its arms in the air (the girls have moved away at this point), and the streamers start screaming “no brother, no bro oh man.” The girls tell the streamers to leave them alone and then walk away.
In his statement video, Agaamuza says that the robot simply ran into the girl and didn't grope her. The robot certainly did run into her, the whole thing was harassing and annoying; in the United States, these sorts of things happen on Twitch constantly, generally with no consequences.
What happened is bad, and is not much different than the types of clips of men harassing women that go viral all the time on social media, many of them filmed or streamed surreptitiously using Meta’s AI glasses. What actually is unusual about this case is that the police appear to actually be taking it seriously.
/s3/static.nrc.nl/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/13155613/141026BIN_2037435971_koets.jpg)
:format(jpeg):fill(f8f8f8,true)/s3/static.nrc.nl/bvhw/wp-content/blogs.dir/114/files/2019/07/roosmalen-marcel-van-online-homepage.png)
