The Guardian

Latest news, sport, business, comment, analysis and reviews from the Guardian, the world's leading liberal voice

Chaotic talks on a US-Iran deal continue on the Trump rollercoaster

Amid rhetoric, market uncertainty and tit-for-tit exchanges, the two sides are still trying to find a way out of the impasse

Great news! Donald Trump has said the US and Iran are on the verge of a peace agreement. Oil prices are down, and the stock market is up. This comes only hours after Trump warned Iran was about to be struck “VERY HARD”, a threat which had sent oil prices up and stocks down.

It has been another ride on the Trump rollercoaster, keeping traders on edge, most of the world poorer, and people of the Middle East constantly whiplashing between fear and hope. But whether the ride veers up or down, the management always makes money.

Continue reading...

‘The absence becomes the point’: the steady march of barely there shoes

Dear Frances offers the latest take on ballet flats, offering ‘a glove-like fit wearability’ – which is fine if you have nice feet

When is a shoe not a shoe? On sale this month is a pair that seems to pose the question – the no shoe-shoe is the work of the cult brand Dear Frances and the latest in a steady march of shoes that are barely there; a take on naked dressing but for the foot.

The Balla shoe, which the brand calls a “sock shoe”, covers almost the entire foot, but also leaves it – encased but on display – in a kind of flimsy foot-cage. According to Jane Frances, the creative director and founder of the brand, it “offers a unique, glove-like fit wearability” and “takes inspiration from the delicate strength of a woman”.

Continue reading...

Trump asking Congress for symbolic expunging of his two impeachments

President is first in US history to be impeached twice, over abuse of power and inciting an insurrection

Donald Trump is pressing Congress to erase one of the darkest chapters of his political career, urging Republicans to pass a resolution that would symbolically nullify the two impeachments he suffered during his first term in office.

The effort, first reported by the Wall Street Journal and confirmed by a White House official, would allow Trump to claim a symbolic victory on a key grievance from his first term. But experts say it would have little legal significance, since the constitution provides no procedure for undoing an impeachment.

Continue reading...

Wel.nl

Minder lezen, Meer weten.

Verstappen rijdt zesde tijd in tweede vrije training Barcelona

BARCELONA (ANP) - Max Verstappen is nog op zoek naar snelheid op het circuit van Barcelona. De viervoudig wereldkampioen noteerde in de tweede vrije training voor de Grote Prijs van Barcelona-Catalonië de zesde tijd in zijn Red Bull. Hij was bijna een seconde langzamer dan regerend wereldkampioen Lando Norris, die in zijn McLaren de snelste ronde reed (1.15,426) op het hete asfalt.

George Russell zette in zijn Mercedes de tweede tijd neer. De Brit, die de snelste was in de eerste vrije training, gaf slechts negen duizendsten toe. Oscar Piastri klokte de derde tijd; de Australiër van McLaren was 57 duizendsten minder snel dan zijn teamgenoot.

WK-leider Kimi Antonelli reed de vijfde tijd in zijn Mercedes. De 19-jarige Italiaan is de man in vorm. Hij won de laatste vijf grands prix en heeft in het kampioenschap 66 punten meer dan zevenvoudig wereldkampioen Lewis Hamilton (Ferrari), die tweede staat in de stand. Verstappen bezet de zevende plaats, met 113 punten minder dan Antonelli.


VK: Voorpagina

Volkskrant.nl biedt het laatste nieuws, opinie en achtergronden

Bemiddelaar Pakistan meldt akkoord over tekst vredesdeal Iran-VS: ‘Vrede is nog nooit zo dichtbij geweest als nu’

Rijnmond - Nieuws

Het laatste nieuws van vandaag over Rotterdam, Feyenoord, het verkeer en het weer in de regio Rijnmond

Volle containers door laaghangende oranje vlaggetjes: 'Leuk versieren is ons niet gegund'

Het WK voetbal is begonnen en dat is ook te merken in Numansdorp. De straten zijn versierd met oranje vlaggetjes. Leuk, maar het levert ook gedoe op. Want het afvalbedrijf zegt dat de vlaggetjes te laag hangen voor de vuilniswagens. Onzin, vinden bewoners. Intussen blijven de volle containers staan.

Oranje vlaggetjes hangen te laag, dus wordt het vuil niet opgehaald: 'Azijnzeikerig is het'

Het WK voetbal is begonnen en dat is ook te merken in Numansdorp. De straten zijn versierd met oranje vlaggetjes. Leuk, maar het levert ook gedoe op. Want het afvalbedrijf zegt dat de vlaggetjes te laag hangen voor de vuilniswagens. Onzin, vinden bewoners. Intussen blijven de volle containers staan.

MetaFilter

The past 24 hours of MetaFilter

:emoji::emoji::emoji: Female Fronted Metal & Rock # 23 :emoji::emoji::emoji:

Evanescence is currently on tour with Spiritbox and Nova Twins, and they collabed on this very cool, live version of Fight Like A Girl. The song originally featured K.Flay.

Spiritbox also collabed recently with SLANDER and Vastive, for this metal/dubstep/something track Under My Skin In other news, I'm officially moving The Warning into the Metal category, at least for The Ritual. Strong metalcore/groove metal vibes, different from their hard-rock roots. Finally, I also enjoyed Stitched Up Heart - MEDUSA (feat. Lyric Noel), soft to hard to screaming, with industrial sounds.

404 Media

404 Media is an independent media company founded by technology journalists Jason Koebler, Emanuel Maiberg, Samantha Cole, and Joseph Cox.

‘You Will Not Speak on Flock Tonight’: County Commissioner Refuses to Let Residents Opposing Flock Speak at Meeting

‘You Will Not Speak on Flock Tonight’: County Commissioner Refuses to Let Residents Opposing Flock Speak at Meeting

A County Commissioner in North Carolina refused to let dozens of residents speak opposing Flock surveillance at a public meeting this week, instead forcing the group to designate one single spokesperson.

“How many people are here for public comment dealing with license plate readers AKA Flock?,” Michael Garrison, the chairman of the Madison County Board of Commissioners began the public meeting by saying. Nearly everyone in the audience’s hand went up. “Probably most everybody. Per our county policy, I’m going to respectfully ask that you guys take a few minutes to converse with each other, designate one person to speak … we’ll move forward with only one person, whoever that happens to be.”

“What? No. We all want to speak on this,” someone in the crowd said; others can be heard trying to object as well.

“You will not speak on Flock tonight,” he responds. “One person designated. You can pick that person … if I gave everyone three minutes to say the same thing, which is opposition to Flock, we’d never get done … I’ve spoken. I’m not debating this. I am taking advantage of our policy as it is written to streamline this process, you can either do it or not.”

“You’re in a room full of people who care!,” a person in the crowd says. 

“We’re not going to engage in this back-and-forth conversation,” he responds. “We’re going to allow one person. Pick a person or not.”

0:00
/1:50

The Madison County Sheriff’s Office has been using Flock’s automated license plate readers, which scan and analyze the time and location of cars as they drive by, since at least March, according to a Facebook post by the Sheriff’s Office. Records compiled by HaveIBeenFlocked.com based on public records requests show that the Sheriff’s Office searches Flock hundreds of times per month. Over the last year, citizen privacy groups have successfully pressured their local governments into ending contracts with Flock. But in some cities and municipalities, residents feel like their concerns have been ignored.

“The Sheriff Office claims they are only using this technology for serious crimes, yet published audit logs tell a different story,” a website called Madison for Privacy says. “Madison County has searched the nationwide database over 1,200 times over just a 60 day period. In a county over only 20,000 residents, its hard to understand what could warrant this many searches.”

Members of the audience and several of the commissioners then argued back and forth. The commissioners said that the citizens constituted a “group” who all had the same position, and therefore could only select one representative to speak for seven minutes, which the board said was longer than the three minutes each person would normally be allowed to speak for. Residents argued that they were not a “group” but were there to give different perspectives on the issue and that they were concerned about the surveillance as specific individuals: “I’m not here as a group, I’m an individual,” one person says.

“I’m not here to argue with you,” a commissioner responds. 

“So you’re going to decide to not listen to your citizens, that’s what you’re saying,” a woman in the crowd says.

“We’re going to follow the policy,” the commissioner responds. 

“Can we request that there be a special meeting,” about Flock, a resident says.

“If you want a special meeting, you go back to the 250 years that the sheriff has been the elected official in the state of North Carolina and you have that meeting with him. This board, we don’t own Flock cameras, I’ve emailed some of you this. We don’t pay for Flock cameras. We don’t operate Flock cameras. We have no interest in Flock camera or Flock camera discussion. That’s your elected sheriff. So if you want to have a meeting with the person that’s involved with that, then you’ll have a meeting with [him], not with us that’s a legislative body. We don’t control the sheriff’s budget. We give him X number of dollars, he does with it what he wishes. I’m not having this discussion. Either you select a person or not.”

One of the residents suggests that the board of commissioners could pass an ordinance about Flock cameras; he is cut off by Garrison, who says again that the residents can pick a person to speak or not. Eventually, the residents do select one representative, who was allowed to speak for seven minutes.

Garrison’s argument is that the Board of Commissioners gives the Sheriff’s Office a budget, and that the Sheriff can spend the money on whatever it wants to. He suggested that the board therefore does not have oversight of what surveillance technology police are buying or what they are using it for. This fact highlights a problem many communities around the country are facing: Cities and counties are sometimes buying Flock surveillance technology without any transparency, with no public process, and with very little oversight. Citizens around the country have also felt like their elected officials are not listening to their concerns about surveillance. 

It is common practice at city council and county council meetings to allow all residents who have shown up to speak provide public comment, which is one of the reasons that these types of meetings are often many hours long. At the Madison County meeting, these residents were not allowed to speak, which is much different than the practices we’ve seen at other, similar meetings. 

Later in the meeting, another resident explains that their public records requests for details about the Sheriff’s Office contracts and use of Flock have not been sufficiently responded to. She was allowed to speak because she was providing comment about her requests for public records, and not Flock specifically. “I’m here to talk about the lack of government transparency and accountability that I’ve seen come up with the Flock issue, starting with tonight. I think that it’s disgraceful the way you are refusing to let citizens speak to their elected officials,” she said. “We’ve repeatedly asked you to hold a public meeting for us to discuss this, so I’m very disappointed to see a lack of transparency.”

The Madison County Board of Commissioners and Madison County Sheriff’s Office did not respond to a request for comment.

 


kottke.org

Jason Kottke's weblog, home of fine hypertext products

US Authorities Investigate Huge Etching of ‘8647’ on...

US Authorities Investigate Huge Etching of ‘8647’ on National Mall Grounds. Bwahaha. Make it a new US National Treasure. An Interior Dept. spokeperson hyperbolically called it a “threat against the president”. 🙄