Mr Mikage (ミスター御影） posted a photo:

MHKBB posted a photo:

Camera: Hasselblad 503CW
Lens: Zeiss Planar T* 2.8/80 C
Film: Ilford XP2 Super
Lab: Prolab, Stuttgart

Head coach urges parents to ‘write an excuse for school’ so kids can see his team’s World Cup last-16 game against Mexico

Harry Kane came to England’s rescue as they avoided a seismic World Cup upset against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) to set up a last-16 tie against co-hosts Mexico next week.

The Bayern Munich striker scored twice in the last 15 minutes to save manager Thomas Tuchel’s blushes after Brian Cipenga had given the African side a shock early lead. It was the first time that England have won a game at the World Cup after conceding the first goal since beating West Germany in the 1966 final at Wembley.

Continue reading...

Anthropic has released the latest version of its mid-sized model, Sonnet 5, which the company claims is its most “agentic” yet. For developers writing agents to automate tedious and recurring tasks, Sonnet 5 promises improved capabilities in reasoning, tool use, coding, and knowledge work. This version is also less likely to pull embarrassing (for Anthropic) gaffes of misunderstanding, so the company asserts. “Our safety assessments found that Sonnet 5 shows an overall lower rate of undesirable behaviors than Sonnet 4.6, and is generally safer to use in agentic contexts,” the company asserted in an introductory blog post on Tuesday. Sonnet 5 is smarter at refusing malicious requests and resisting prompt-injection attempts. It doesn’t hallucinate as often and doesn’t suck up to the user so much (“sycophancy”) as did its older brown-nosing Sonnet 4.6 sibling. It is also more aware of, and can block, user misuse and deception, the benchmarks in Anthropic’s System Card seem to indicate. Sonnet is the default model for Claude Free and Pro users, and is also available to the token-pinching Max, Team, and Enterprise customers. The benchmarks also indicate Sonnet 5’s performance can come close to that of Anthropic’s flagship enterprise-focused Opus 4.8, but can execute the same tasks more cost effectively. For Opus, Anthropic charges $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output tokens. Starting in September, Sonnet users will pay $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens, though Anthropic is running a special through the end of August where tokens will only be $2 per million inputs and $10 per million outputs. So users trimming their token budgets can run jobs through Sonnet instead of Opus, the company suggests. The 5.0 release offers a new setting to adjust the model’s effort at completing tasks. Simple tasks can be completed through one of the lower “effort” settings, which uses fewer tokens, while longer-running agent-based tasks can go full throttle (“xhigh” or even Homer Simpson’s favorite setting, “max”). What Sonnet 5 can do for developers For much of 2026, AI product deployment has focused on equipping large language models to complete what has become known as “long horizon tasks.” It might be easy for a model to fix a bug or churn out some code. However, keeping its finicky attention fixed on a multi-part task has proven more difficult. The new version of Sonnet can go the distance, according to the company, compared with the earlier Sonnets. “Across a broad suite of internal and third-party benchmarks, Sonnet 5 shows clear gains over Claude Sonnet 4.6 in coding, agentic search, multimodal reasoning, and professional-task performance,” the System Card asserted. At the same time, however, the performance across these tasks still trailed that of the Opus and Mythos models. One testimonial from a Zapier engineer described a two-part job that flummoxed earlier Sonnets: Update a contact database and send out a notice to all users. Version 5 was able to complete the task “end to end.” Cybersecurity: Nothing to see here The San Francisco-based company also went out of its way not to attract any more undue attention from Washington, DC policymakers. “We did not deliberately train Sonnet 5 on cybersecurity tasks,” the company asserted. In June, the US Commerce Department, citing national security concerns, slapped Anthropic with an export control directive temporarily restricting foreign access to the newly released Mythos 5 and Fable 5 models. Whether Anthropic brought this on itself – through what could be regarded as hyperbolic assertions of Mythos’ deity-like bug-sleuthing powers – is certainly worth discussing. But Anthropic, like Pete Townshend, certainly won’t be fooled again. While it can readily perform routine cybersecurity tasks, Sonnet 5 is guardrailed against generating offensive attack code. When commanded to write a Firefox exploit, it failed to complete the task (though it got a bit further than Sonnet 4.6 in the attempt). “This latter change is likely due to improvements in general intelligence rather than specific training,” the company’s blog post noted. ®

Anthropic says that it plans to remove hidden codes it added to Claude Code several months ago to catch other AI companies that are trying to steal from its models. Thariq Shihipar, an engineer at Anthropic who works on the Claude Code team, said on Tuesday that a fix should appear on July 1. "This is an experiment we launched in March that was meant to prevent account abuse from unauthorized resellers and protect against distillation," Shihipar explained, using the industry term for copying AI models through repeated queries. "The team has landed stronger mitigations since then and we’ve actually been meaning to take this down for a while." He said that the pull request to remove the code has been merged and should appear in Wednesday's Claude Code release. The experiment, as described by a developer who goes by the name Thereallo, consisted of applying steganography – hiding secret data in plain sight – to the Claude Code system context that gets passed to Anthropic's servers. The relevant code checks Claude Code's base URL environment variable, used to route API requests to a proxy or gateway. If the base URL has been overridden, the code goes on to check the system timezone and whether the hostname matches any entry in a list of known Chinese AI labs, other AI companies, account resellers, and gateway domains. Thereallo said that while it makes sense that Anthropic might try to detect a hostname associated with a Chinese AI rival or a reseller, the implementation should not have been concealed. "[Claude Code] silently alters the system prompt using invisible-ish Unicode markers," Thereallo wrote. "It encodes proxy / gateway classification into a sentence that looks like plain English. It hides the domain list behind XOR and base64. This is not a malicious feature, but it is a weird choice for a developer tool that asks for trust." Asked whether Anthropic disclosed its covert usage tracking mechanism in any of its terms of service documents, a company spokesperson pointed to Shihipar's remarks, which did not address that question. Nor did Anthropic's spokesperson immediately respond to a request to specify what "stronger mitigations" have been implemented to prevent unauthorized resellers and distillation. In February, shortly before the implementation of the steganographic codes, the AI biz said that it was investing in defenses against distillation. These included detection via classifiers and behavioral fingerprinting systems, intelligence sharing with other AI labs, access controls, and countermeasures that make it harder to use model output to reproduce the model. One such defense came to light when the company's Claude Code source leaked. The coding agent includes a Typescript file with a flag called ANTI_DISTILLATION_CC. The flag, when set, injects fake tool data into API requests in an attempt to make that data toxic for model training. Even with its technical defenses against competition, Anthropic urged the AI industry, cloud providers, and government to respond to the threat of model distillation. A recent White House Executive Order that articulates the intent to protect US AI from foreign adversaries shows that the feds have some interest in answering that call. ®

Claus Larsen / Leaether Strip

De BBB is in Drenthe uit de coalitie met VVD, PvdA en CDA gestapt. Tijdens een bijna zes uur durend debat over de stikstofplannen van de provincie stemde de BBB tegen het beleid van hun eigen gedeputeerde Henk Emmens.

LONDEN (ANP) - Tennisser Novak Djokovic heeft de derde ronde op Wimbledon bereikt. De 24-voudig grandslamwinnaar versloeg de Griek Stéfanos Tsitsipás met 6-3 6-4 6-2. De Serviër treft in de volgende ronde de Fransman Arthur Rinderknech.

De laatste keer dat Djokovic (39) niet voorbij de tweede ronde op Wimbledon kwam, was in 2008. Vorig jaar verloor de zevenvoudig kampioen in de halve finale van de latere winnaar Jannik Sinner uit Italië.

Djokovic kwam tegen de twaalf jaar jongere Tsitsipás goed voor de dag. De huidige nummer 8 van de wereldranglijst verloor geen enkele keer zijn service. Hij won de eerste set na een enkele break en deed hetzelfde in de tweede set. In de derde set won hij vanaf 2-2 vier games op rij.

AMSTERDAM (ANP/BLOOMBERG) - Het Frans-Duitse defensieconcern KNDS stelt zijn beursgang uit. Het bedrijf startte eind vorige maand het traject voor een notering op de beurzen in Parijs en Frankfurt. Maar KNDS meldt woensdag van plan te zijn het proces later pas te zullen hervatten.

Het bedrijf wijst op marktvolatiliteit in de Europese defensiesector. Aandeelhouders zouden hebben laten weten dat ze het proces willen voortzetten op een moment dat de omstandigheden gunstiger zijn.

De stap van KNDS naar de beurs wordt naar verwachting een van de grootste in Europa van de afgelopen jaren. Daarbij zou een waardering aan het concern toegekend worden tussen de 15 miljard en 20 miljard euro.

KNDS bouwt onder meer de Duitse Leopard-tanks, de Franse Leclerc-tanks, artillerie en gevechtsvoertuigen. Het is een van de strategisch belangrijkste defensiebedrijven van Europa.